1 Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
2 Headache Group, UCL Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Cephalalgia. 2018 Feb;38(2):393-398. doi: 10.1177/0333102417735847. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
Objectives To assess the effectiveness of neuromodulation and trigeminal microvascular decompression (MVD) in patients with medically-intractable short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT). Methods Two patients with medically refractory SUNCT underwent MVD following beneficial but incomplete response to neuromodulation (occipital nerve stimulation and deep brain stimulation). MRI confirmed neurovascular conflict with the ipsilateral trigeminal nerve in both patients. Results Although neuromodulation provided significant benefit, it did not deliver complete relief from pain and management required numerous postoperative visits with adjustment of medication and stimulation parameters. Conversely, MVD was successful in eliminating symptoms of SUNCT in both patients with no need for further medical treatment or neuromodulation. Conclusion Neuromodulation requires expensive hardware and lifelong follow-up and maintenance. These case reports highlight that microvascular decompression may be preferable to neuromodulation in the subset of SUNCT patients with ipsilateral neurovascular conflict.
评估神经调节和三叉神经根微血管减压术(MVD)对药物难治性短暂单侧神经痛样头痛伴结膜充血和流泪(SUNCT)患者的疗效。
2 例药物难治性 SUNCT 患者在神经调节(枕神经刺激和深部脑刺激)治疗有效但不完全缓解后接受了 MVD。MRI 证实 2 例患者均存在同侧三叉神经与血管的神经血管冲突。
尽管神经调节有显著疗效,但并不能完全缓解疼痛,需要多次术后就诊,调整药物和刺激参数。相比之下,MVD 成功消除了 2 例 SUNCT 患者的症状,无需进一步药物治疗或神经调节。
神经调节需要昂贵的硬件和终身随访和维护。这些病例报告强调,对于存在同侧神经血管冲突的 SUNCT 患者亚组,微血管减压可能优于神经调节。