• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一般和日常控制信念在成年期和老年期对情感应激反应的作用。

The Role of General and Daily Control Beliefs for Affective Stressor-Reactivity Across Adulthood and Old Age.

机构信息

Department of Human Development & Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.

Department of Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Jan 10;74(2):242-253. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx055.

DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbx055
PMID:28977477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6327657/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

General and situational control beliefs have been examined separately as buffers of the effects of daily stressors on affective well-being. However, general (trait) control beliefs reflect perceived ability to adapt, change, and influence overall life circumstances, whereas situational (daily) control beliefs reflect perceived ability to manage current circumstances and achieve desired outcomes.

METHOD

Using 9 weeks of daily reports from 150 adults aged 18-89 years, we examined the extent that general and daily control beliefs buffer the between- and within-person associations involving stressors and negative and positive affect (i.e., daily stress processes) and whether/how the extent of buffering differs with age.

RESULTS

Aligning with prior findings, both greater average stressor exposure and experiencing a daily stressor compromised daily affective well-being and both higher general and daily control beliefs facilitated daily affective well-being. Specific to the motivating hypotheses, both general and daily control beliefs buffered daily stressor-reactivity. Age was associated with individuals' daily stressor-buffering, such that stressor-reactivity was more effectively damped at older ages. Associations between general control beliefs and daily stress processes were age invariant.

DISCUSSION

Mixed evidence of age differences across general and daily control beliefs highlights how within-person processes may differentially contribute to well-being as individuals accommodate age-related strengths and vulnerabilities.

摘要

背景

一般和情境控制信念已被分别研究为缓冲日常压力源对情感幸福感的影响。然而,一般(特质)控制信念反映了对适应、改变和影响整体生活环境的感知能力,而情境(日常)控制信念反映了对管理当前环境和实现期望结果的感知能力。

方法

我们使用 150 名 18-89 岁成年人的 9 周日常报告,检验了一般和日常控制信念在涉及压力源和消极及积极情绪的个体间和个体内关联(即日常压力过程)中的缓冲程度,以及缓冲程度是否以及如何随年龄而变化。

结果

与先前的发现一致,较高的平均压力源暴露和经历日常压力源都损害了日常情感幸福感,而较高的一般和日常控制信念都促进了日常情感幸福感。具体到激发假设,一般和日常控制信念都缓冲了日常压力源反应。年龄与个体的日常压力源缓冲有关,即压力源反应在较年长时被更有效地抑制。一般控制信念与日常压力过程之间的关联与年龄无关。

讨论

一般和日常控制信念在年龄上的混合证据突显了个体如何适应与年龄相关的优势和脆弱性,从而使个体的内在过程可能对幸福感产生不同的影响。

相似文献

1
The Role of General and Daily Control Beliefs for Affective Stressor-Reactivity Across Adulthood and Old Age.一般和日常控制信念在成年期和老年期对情感应激反应的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Jan 10;74(2):242-253. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx055.
2
Control diversity: How across-domain control beliefs are associated with daily negative affect and differ with age.控制多样性:跨领域的控制信念如何与日常负面情绪相关联,并因年龄而异。
Psychol Aging. 2019 Aug;34(5):625-639. doi: 10.1037/pag0000366. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
3
The Ups and Downs of Daily Life During COVID-19: Age Differences in Affect, Stress, and Positive Events.新冠疫情期间日常生活的起起落落:情绪、压力和积极事件的年龄差异。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):e30-e37. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa096.
4
Stressor diversity: Introduction and empirical integration into the daily stress model.应激源多样性:引入及纳入日常应激模型的实证研究
Psychol Aging. 2016 Jun;31(4):301-20. doi: 10.1037/pag0000095.
5
Reactivity to daily stressors in adulthood: the importance of stressor type in characterizing risk factors.成年人对日常压力源的反应:压力源类型在刻画风险因素方面的重要性。
Psychol Aging. 2010 Mar;25(1):118-31. doi: 10.1037/a0018747.
6
Age and Sex Differences in the Associations Among Socioeconomic Status, Affective Reactivity to Daily Stressors, and Physical Health in the MIDUS Study.《中老龄全国健康与退休纵向研究》中社会经济地位、日常压力源情绪反应与身体健康的关联在年龄和性别上的差异。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Oct 16;57(11):942-950. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaad034.
7
Reactivity to stressor pile-up in adulthood: effects on daily negative and positive affect.成年后面临压力源堆积的反应:对日常消极和积极情绪的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2014 Mar;29(1):72-83. doi: 10.1037/a0035500.
8
Age differences in reactivity to daily stressors: the role of personal control.应对日常压力源的反应中的年龄差异:个人控制的作用。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jul;62(4):P216-25. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.4.p216.
9
Psychological vulnerability to daily stressors in old age: Results of short-term longitudinal studies.老年人日常压力源的心理易感性:短期纵向研究结果
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Aug;48(6):517-23. doi: 10.1007/s00391-015-0935-7. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
10
Negative Aging Attitudes Predict Greater Reactivity to Daily Stressors in Older Adults.负面的衰老态度预测老年人对日常压力源的反应更大。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Sep 20;73(7):1155-1159. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw086.

引用本文的文献

1
Daily association between perceived control and resolution of daily stressors strengthens across a decade of adulthood.在成年后的十年间,感知到的控制感与日常压力源的解决之间的日常关联日益增强。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Aug 27;3(1):130. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00313-7.
2
Daily Stressor-Related Negative Mood and its Associations with Flourishing and Daily Curiosity.与日常应激源相关的负面情绪及其与蓬勃发展和日常好奇心的关联。
J Happiness Stud. 2022 Feb;23(2):423-438. doi: 10.1007/s10902-021-00404-2. Epub 2021 May 8.
3
Effects of gender, education, contact with older adults and health-related jobs on memory control beliefs across the lifespan.性别、教育程度、与老年人的接触以及与健康相关的工作对一生中记忆控制信念的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 6;15(1):7908. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92603-7.
4
Changes in daily stress reactivity and changes in physical health across 18 years of adulthood.成年期18年间日常应激反应性的变化及身体健康的变化。
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae086.
5
Mattering and Self-Esteem as Bulwarks Against the Consequences of Financial Strain for Loneliness in Later Life: Differentiating Between- and Within-Person Processes.有意义感和自尊是抵御晚年经济压力导致孤独感后果的堡垒:区分个体间和个体内的过程。
Res Aging. 2024 Mar-Apr;46(3-4):241-257. doi: 10.1177/01640275231221326. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
6
Perceived control across the adult lifespan: Longitudinal changes in global control and daily stressor control.成人期全生命周期的感知控制:总体控制和日常压力源控制的纵向变化。
Dev Psychol. 2024 Jan;60(1):45-58. doi: 10.1037/dev0001618. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
7
Gloomy and out of control? Consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on momentary optimism in daily live of adolescents.情绪低落且失去控制?新冠疫情对青少年日常生活中即时乐观情绪的影响。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jun 25:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03313-6.
8
Distinct Psychological Characteristics Predict Resilience and Recovery Throughout Widowhood.不同的心理特征可预测鳏寡后的适应力和恢复力。
Behav Ther. 2022 May;53(3):428-439. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
9
The Interplay Between Affective Processing and Sense of Agency During Action Regulation: A Review.行动调节过程中情感加工与能动感之间的相互作用:一项综述
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 16;12:716220. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716220. eCollection 2021.
10
Adverse childhood experiences amplify the longitudinal associations of adult daily stress and health.不良的童年经历会放大成人日常压力与健康之间的纵向关联。
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Dec;122:105337. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105337. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining the Interplay of Processes Across Multiple Time-Scales: Illustration With the Intraindividual Study of Affect, Health, and Interpersonal Behavior (iSAHIB).审视多时间尺度上各过程的相互作用:以情感、健康和人际行为的个体内研究(iSAHIB)为例
Res Hum Dev. 2014;11(2):142-160. doi: 10.1080/15427609.2014.906739. Epub 2014 May 14.
2
Reactivity to stressor pile-up in adulthood: effects on daily negative and positive affect.成年后面临压力源堆积的反应:对日常消极和积极情绪的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2014 Mar;29(1):72-83. doi: 10.1037/a0035500.
3
Emotional Reactivity and Mortality: Longitudinal Findings From the VA Normative Aging Study.情绪反应性与死亡率:退伍军人事务部规范老化研究的纵向研究结果
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 May;70(3):398-406. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt107. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
4
Age differences in Exposure and Reactivity to Interpersonal Tensions among Black and White Individuals across Adulthood.成年期黑人和白人在人际紧张暴露及反应方面的年龄差异。
Race Soc Probl. 2011 Oct 1;3(3):225-239. doi: 10.1007/s12552-011-9058-y.
5
The wear and tear of daily stressors on mental health.日常压力源对心理健康的磨损。
Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):733-41. doi: 10.1177/0956797612462222. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
6
Age and time-to-death trajectories of change in indicators of cognitive, sensory, physical, health, social, and self-related functions.认知、感官、身体、健康、社会和自我相关功能指标的随年龄和死亡时间变化的轨迹。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Oct;49(10):1805-21. doi: 10.1037/a0031340. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
7
Life contexts make a difference: emotional stability in younger and older adults.生活背景造成差异:年轻人和老年人的情绪稳定性。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Mar;28(1):148-59. doi: 10.1037/a0030047. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
8
Personal Risk and Resilience Factors in the Context of Daily Stress.日常压力情境下的个人风险与复原力因素
Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Jan 1;32(1):251-274. doi: 10.1891/0198-8794.32.251. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
9
Strength and vulnerability integration: a model of emotional well-being across adulthood.力量与脆弱性整合:成年期情感幸福感模型。
Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;136(6):1068-91. doi: 10.1037/a0021232.
10
Where people live and die makes a difference: Individual and geographic disparities in well-being progression at the end of life.人们生活和死亡的地方会产生影响:生命末期幸福感发展的个体和地理差异。
Psychol Aging. 2010 Sep;25(3):661-76. doi: 10.1037/a0019574.