Suppr超能文献

社论:名称游戏:通过将不完全结肠镜检查归类为乙状结肠镜检查来规避质量指标。

Editorial: The Name Game: Circumventing Quality Metrics by Categorizing Incomplete Colonoscopy as Sigmoidoscopy.

作者信息

Kaz Andrew M, Dominitz Jason A

机构信息

Gastroenterology Section, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.

Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;112(10):1553-1555. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.258.

Abstract

Cecal intubation rate (CIR) is an important metric for colonoscopy quality. Guidelines propose a minimum CIR of 90% for all indications, and 95% in screening procedures. In this issue, a study of three UK teaching hospitals demonstrated one-third of endoscopists inappropriately converted colonoscopies to flexible sigmoidoscopies, and several endoscopists only reached the 90% CIR benchmark because of these inappropriate conversions. Our professional societies and healthcare organizations must continue to work to improve the accurate assessment of colonoscopy quality in order to identify underperforming clinicians who should be provided with additional training for the benefit of their patients.

摘要

盲肠插管率(CIR)是衡量结肠镜检查质量的一项重要指标。指南建议,所有适应证的最低CIR为90%,筛查程序中的最低CIR为95%。在本期杂志中,一项针对英国三家教学医院的研究表明,三分之一的内镜医师将结肠镜检查不恰当地转换为乙状结肠镜检查,还有几位内镜医师仅因这些不恰当的转换才达到90%的CIR基准。我们的专业协会和医疗保健组织必须继续努力,以改进对结肠镜检查质量的准确评估,从而识别出表现不佳的临床医生,应为他们提供额外培训,以造福患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验