• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators.结肠镜检查关键性能指标的专家意见和科学证据。
Gut. 2016 Dec;65(12):2045-2060. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312043. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
2
UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy.英国结肠镜检查的关键绩效指标和质量保证标准。
Gut. 2016 Dec;65(12):1923-1929. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312044. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
3
Quality measures improving endoscopic screening of colorectal cancer: a review of the literature.质量措施改善结直肠癌内镜筛查:文献综述。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2019 Mar;19(3):223-235. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1565999. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
4
Clinical practice guidelines: quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.临床实践指南:结直肠癌筛查中结肠镜检查的质量
Endoscopy. 2012 Apr;44(4):444-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1306690. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
5
Differences in screening vs non-screening colonoscopy: scope for improvement?筛查与非筛查结肠镜检查的差异:有改进的空间吗?
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Sep;18(9):903-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.13291.
6
Colonoscopy quality assessment.结肠镜检查质量评估。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015 Apr;25(2):373-86. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.11.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
7
Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.结肠镜检查的质量指标与间隔期癌症风险
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 30;363(14):1372-3; author reply 1373. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1006842.
8
Quality assurance for screening colonoscopies.结肠镜筛查的质量保证
Z Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr;46 Suppl 1:S43-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963484.
9
[Colonoscopy in the screening, follow-up and treatment of colorectal cancer and precursor lesions].[结肠镜检查在结直肠癌及癌前病变的筛查、随访及治疗中的应用]
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Sep;38 Suppl 1:71-7. doi: 10.1016/S0210-5705(15)30022-4.
10
Risk Factors of Missed Adenoma Detected by Colonoscopic Polypectomy and Its Impact of the Endoscopic System.结肠镜息肉切除术漏诊腺瘤的危险因素及其对内镜系统的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Apr;70(4):1503-1510. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-08937-9. Epub 2025 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Updates in the endoscopic management of colorectal polyps.结直肠息肉内镜治疗的进展
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s12664-025-01838-9.
2
Psychometric Evaluation of the Patient Experience Colonoscopy Scale.患者体验结肠镜检查量表的心理测量学评估
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70220. doi: 10.1111/jep.70220.
3
The impact of artificial intelligence on the adenoma detection rate : Comparison between experienced, intermediate and trainee endoscopists' adenoma detection rate.人工智能对腺瘤检出率的影响:经验丰富、中等水平和实习内镜医师腺瘤检出率的比较。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s00508-025-02561-3.
4
Patient- and endoscopist-related risk factors and etiological categorization of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer.结肠镜检查后结直肠癌的患者及内镜医师相关危险因素和病因分类
Endosc Int Open. 2025 May 16;13:a25663380. doi: 10.1055/a-2566-3380. eCollection 2025.
5
Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation.结肠镜检查正式质量框架的成本与效益:经济评估
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Nov 18;12(11):E1334-E1341. doi: 10.1055/a-2444-6292. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
Choosing Your Endoscopist: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study.选择你的内镜医师:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 21;16(8):e67403. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67403. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Colorectal cancer screening: Modalities and adherence.结直肠癌筛查:方法和依从性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun 28;30(24):3048-3051. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i24.3048.
8
Exhaled volatile organic compounds in the detection of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.呼出挥发性有机化合物在结直肠癌检测中的应用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
EXCLI J. 2024 May 17;23:795-810. doi: 10.17179/excli2024-7042. eCollection 2024.
9
Clinical Course and Prognosis of Isolated Terminal Ileal Ulcers.孤立性末端回肠溃疡的临床病程和预后。
Arch Iran Med. 2023 Aug 1;26(8):434-438. doi: 10.34172/aim.2023.66.
10
The Detection of Colorectal Cancer through Machine Learning-Based Breath Sensor Analysis.通过基于机器学习的呼吸传感器分析检测结直肠癌。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 31;13(21):3355. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13213355.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment and management of the malignant colorectal polyp.恶性大肠息肉的评估与管理
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;6(2):117-126. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2015-100565. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
2
Bowel cancer screening is safe, detects earlier stage cancer and adenomas in 50% of cases: experience of the prevalent round of screening from two first wave centres in the North East of England.肠癌筛查是安全的,在50%的病例中可检测出早期癌症和腺瘤:来自英格兰东北部两个首批筛查中心的首轮筛查经验。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan;3(1):10-15. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2011-100004. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
3
UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy.英国结肠镜检查的关键绩效指标和质量保证标准。
Gut. 2016 Dec;65(12):1923-1929. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312044. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
4
Narrow band imaging optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice: the Detect Inspect Characterise Resect and Discard 2 (DISCARD 2) study.常规临床实践中小肠结肠息肉的窄带成像光学诊断:检测、检查、表征、切除与丢弃2(DISCARD 2)研究
Gut. 2017 May;66(5):887-895. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310584. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
5
Detection rate of serrated polyps and serrated polyposis syndrome in colorectal cancer screening cohorts: a European overview.结直肠筛查队列中锯齿状息肉和锯齿状息肉病综合征的检出率:欧洲概述。
Gut. 2017 Jul;66(7):1225-1232. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310784. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
6
Risks Associated With Anesthesia Services During Colonoscopy.结肠镜检查期间麻醉服务相关风险。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Apr;150(4):888-94; quiz e18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.12.018. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
7
Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Endocuff 结肠镜与常规结肠镜检查对腺瘤的检出率:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):438-445. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310097. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
8
[S2k guideline: quality requirements for gastrointestinal endoscopy, AWMF registry no. 021-022].[S2k指南:胃肠内镜检查的质量要求,德国医学专业协会注册编号021 - 022]
Z Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec;53(12):1496-530. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-109520. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures.欧洲胃肠内镜学会质量改进倡议:制定绩效指标
Endoscopy. 2016 Jan;48(1):81-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1569580. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
10
Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates Guideline--Updated June 2015.非麻醉医生使用丙泊酚进行胃肠内镜检查:欧洲胃肠内镜学会、欧洲胃肠病学与内镜护理及相关人员学会指南——2015年6月更新
Endoscopy. 2015 Dec;47(12):1175-89. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393414. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

结肠镜检查关键性能指标的专家意见和科学证据。

Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators.

作者信息

Rees Colin J, Bevan Roisin, Zimmermann-Fraedrich Katharina, Rutter Matthew D, Rex Douglas, Dekker Evelien, Ponchon Thierry, Bretthauer Michael, Regula Jaroslaw, Saunders Brian, Hassan Cesare, Bourke Michael J, Rösch Thomas

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside District Hospital, South Shields, UK.

Department of Gastroenterology, North Tees University Hospital, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.

出版信息

Gut. 2016 Dec;65(12):2045-2060. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312043. Epub 2016 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312043
PMID:27802153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5136701/
Abstract

Colonoscopy is a widely performed procedure with procedural volumes increasing annually throughout the world. Many procedures are now performed as part of colorectal cancer screening programmes. Colonoscopy should be of high quality and measures of this quality should be evidence based. New UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards have been developed by a working group with consensus agreement on each standard reached. This paper reviews the scientific basis for each of the quality measures published in the UK standards.

摘要

结肠镜检查是一种广泛开展的诊疗操作,全球范围内其操作量逐年增加。现在,许多结肠镜检查作为结直肠癌筛查项目的一部分进行。结肠镜检查应具备高质量,且这种质量的衡量标准应以证据为基础。一个工作组制定了新的英国关键绩效指标和质量保证标准,并且就每项标准达成了共识。本文回顾了英国标准中公布的各项质量衡量指标的科学依据。