• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于在米尔格拉姆范式内进行的研究中服从水平的信念:优于平均效应以及不同国家居民典型行为的比较

Beliefs about Obedience Levels in Studies Conducted within the Milgram Paradigm: Better than Average Effect and Comparisons of Typical Behaviors by Residents of Various Nations.

作者信息

Grzyb Tomasz, Dolinski Dariusz

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology in Wroclaw, SWPS University of Social Sciences and HumanitiesWarsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 20;8:1632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01632. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01632
PMID:28979232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5611685/
Abstract

The article presents studies examining whether the better than average (BTA) effect appears in opinions regarding obedience of individuals participating in an experiment conducted in the Milgram paradigm. Participants are presented with a detailed description of the experiment, asked to declare at what moment an average participant would cease their participation in the study, and then asked to declare at what moment they themselves would quit the experiment. It turned out that the participants demonstrated a strong BTA effect. This effect also concerned those who had known the results of the Milgram experiment prior to the study. Interestingly, those individuals-in contrast to naive participants-judged that the average person would remain obedient for longer, but at the same time prior familiarity with the Milgram experiment did not impact convictions as to own obedience. By the same token, the BTA effect size was larger among those who had previously heard of the Milgram experiment than those who had not. Additionally, study participants were asked to estimate the behavior of the average resident of their country (Poland), as well as of average residents of several other European countries. It turned out that in participants' judgment the average Pole would withdraw from the experiment quicker than the average Russian and average German, but later than average residents of France and England.

摘要

本文介绍了一些研究,这些研究考察了在对参与米尔格拉姆范式实验的个体的服从性看法中,是否会出现高于平均水平(BTA)效应。向参与者详细描述了该实验,要求他们表明普通参与者会在何时停止参与研究,然后要求他们表明自己会在何时退出实验。结果发现,参与者表现出强烈的BTA效应。这种效应也涉及那些在研究之前就知道米尔格拉姆实验结果的人。有趣的是,与天真的参与者相比,这些人认为普通人会保持服从的时间更长,但同时,之前对米尔格拉姆实验的了解并没有影响他们对自己服从性的信念。同样,之前听说过米尔格拉姆实验的人比没听说过的人BTA效应大小更大。此外,研究参与者被要求估计他们国家(波兰)普通居民的行为,以及其他几个欧洲国家普通居民的行为。结果发现,在参与者的判断中,波兰普通居民会比俄罗斯普通居民和德国普通居民更快退出实验,但比法国和英国普通居民退出得晚。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ee7/5611685/82bcfd33140b/fpsyg-08-01632-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ee7/5611685/a2b4524087b8/fpsyg-08-01632-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ee7/5611685/82bcfd33140b/fpsyg-08-01632-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ee7/5611685/a2b4524087b8/fpsyg-08-01632-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ee7/5611685/82bcfd33140b/fpsyg-08-01632-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Beliefs about Obedience Levels in Studies Conducted within the Milgram Paradigm: Better than Average Effect and Comparisons of Typical Behaviors by Residents of Various Nations.关于在米尔格拉姆范式内进行的研究中服从水平的信念:优于平均效应以及不同国家居民典型行为的比较
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 20;8:1632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01632. eCollection 2017.
2
You and I are alike, so I will hold back - The effect of directed empathy on the behavior of participants of Stanley Milgram's obedience paradigm.你我相似,所以我会有所保留——定向同理心对斯坦利·米尔格拉姆服从范式参与者行为的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Apr;234:103859. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103859. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
3
Perpetrator as a Potential Victim. Does Threatened Retaliation from the Victim Reduce Obedience towards Authority?作恶者作为潜在受害者。受害者的报复威胁会降低对权威的服从吗?
Psychol Belg. 2017 Jul 3;57(2):123-132. doi: 10.5334/pb.397.
4
Obedience without orders: Expanding social psychology's conception of 'obedience'.无需命令的服从:拓展社会心理学对“服从”的概念理解。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jan;58(1):241-259. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12272. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
5
The (doubtful) role of financial reward in obedience to authority.权威服从中经济报酬的(可疑)作用。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(4):490-496. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1505708. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
6
Personality predicts obedience in a Milgram paradigm.人格预测米尔格拉姆范式中的服从行为。
J Pers. 2015 Jun;83(3):299-306. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12104. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
7
Working Toward the Experimenter: Reconceptualizing Obedience Within the Milgram Paradigm as Identification-Based Followership.向实验者靠拢:在米尔格拉姆范式中重新概念化服从为基于认同的追随。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul;7(4):315-24. doi: 10.1177/1745691612448482.
8
Obedience to authority as a function of the physical proximity of the student, teacher, and experimenter.学生、教师和实验者的身体距离对服从权威的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2024 May 2:1-13. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2024.2348479.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments.一项虚拟重现的斯坦利·米尔格拉姆服从实验。
PLoS One. 2006 Dec 20;1(1):e39. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000039.

引用本文的文献

1
A multi-institution longitudinal randomised control trial of speaking up: Implications for theory and practice.一项关于直言不讳的多机构纵向随机对照试验:对理论与实践的启示
Can J Respir Ther. 2024 Oct 23;60:152-163. doi: 10.29390/001c.124914. eCollection 2024.
2
The chameleon effect in customer relationship management: Experiments on the spillover effects of mimicry in natural settings of a chain hotel and a chain grocery shop.客户关系管理中的变色龙效应:连锁酒店和连锁杂货店自然场景下模仿溢出效应的实验
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 14;14:1016125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1016125. eCollection 2023.
3
Conformity, obedience, and the Better than Average Effect in health professional students.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Self-Esteem a Central Ingredient of the Self-Concept?自尊是自我概念的核心要素吗?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1988 Mar;14(1):34-45. doi: 10.1177/0146167288141004.
2
Self-Enhancement: Food for Thought.自我提升:值得深思的食物。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Mar;3(2):102-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00068.x.
3
Error and bias in comparative judgment: on being both better and worse than we think we are.比较判断中的误差与偏差:我们比自己认为的更好或更差。
健康专业学生中的从众、服从及优于常人效应。
Can Med Educ J. 2022 Mar 2;13(1):55-64. doi: 10.36834/cmej.71970. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
A multi-method exploratory study of health professional students' experiences with compliance behaviours.一项关于健康专业学生遵守行为体验的多方法探索性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 12;20(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02265-4.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;92(6):972-89. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.972.
4
Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review.为什么人们需要自尊?一项理论与实证综述。
Psychol Bull. 2004 May;130(3):435-68. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435.
5
BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE.服从行为研究
J Abnorm Psychol. 1963 Oct;67:371-8. doi: 10.1037/h0040525.
6
Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority.一些服从和违抗权威的情形。
Int J Psychiatry. 1968 Oct;6(4):259-76.