Bagga Deepak, Prasad Ashish, Grover Shabnam Bhandari, Sugandhi Nidhi, Tekchandani Narender, Acharya Samir Kant, Samie Amat
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Department of Radiology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2018 Jan;34(1):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s00383-017-4170-8. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
The best operative intervention for intrabdominal testis (IAT) has not been standardized as yet. The question of whether to bring down an IAT with a single-staged vessel-intact laparoscopic orchidopexy (VILO) or a two-staged laparoscopic Fowler-Stephens orchidopexy (FSLO) is still undergoing debate, with both the procedures being popular. The present study has been designed to evaluate the factors predicting the success or failure of two-staged FSLO for (IAT).
43 boys with 49 non-palpable testes underwent diagnostic laparoscopy out of which 35 underwent two-staged FSLO. Size of the testis was measured with a graduated probe in both stages. Independent variables such as age, height, testis-to-internal ring distance (T-IR), neo internal ring-to-midscrotal distance (NIR-MS), and mobility-to-contralateral ring (MCIR) were analysed. Postoperatively 34 IATs were followed up clinically as well as ultrasonologically after 6 months, to see for the size, position, and vascularity. Based on this, the patients were divided into two groups, Group A (successful) and Group B (Failed).
24 IATs had a successful outcome (Group A) and 11 were failure (Group B). The overall success rate of the study was 68.6%. The difference in mean age of patients in both groups was insignificant (p = 0.89) (Fig. 1), and similarly, the difference in mean height was insignificant (p = 0.61). The difference in mean T-IR in both the groups was insignificant (1.85 versus 2.77 cm; p = 0.09) and mean NIR-MS was 5.41 cm in Group A and 5.10 cm in Group B, and the difference again was insignificant (p = 0.23).
The success rate of FSLO was 68.6%. None of the above-described independent variables have any effect on the outcome of two-staged FSLO. While VILO remains the treatment of choice for IAT located at or near the ring, but IAT higher than this, two-staged FSLO gives a better chance for achieving intra-scrotal orchidopexy.
腹腔内睾丸(IAT)的最佳手术干预方法尚未标准化。对于采用单阶段血管完整腹腔镜睾丸下降固定术(VILO)还是两阶段腹腔镜Fowler-Stephens睾丸下降固定术(FSLO)来下降IAT这一问题仍存在争议,这两种手术都很常用。本研究旨在评估预测两阶段FSLO治疗IAT成败的因素。
43例患有49个不可触及睾丸的男孩接受了诊断性腹腔镜检查,其中35例接受了两阶段FSLO。在两个阶段均用刻度探针测量睾丸大小。分析年龄、身高、睾丸至内环距离(T-IR)、新内环至阴囊中部距离(NIR-MS)和向对侧内环的活动度(MCIR)等独立变量。术后对34例IAT进行了6个月的临床及超声随访,观察其大小、位置和血管情况。据此,将患者分为两组,A组(成功)和B组(失败)。
24例IAT手术成功(A组),11例失败(B组)。本研究的总体成功率为68.6%。两组患者的平均年龄差异无统计学意义(p = 0.89)(图1),同样,平均身高差异也无统计学意义(p = 0.61)。两组的平均T-IR差异无统计学意义(1.85对2.77 cm;p = 0.09),A组的平均NIR-MS为5.41 cm,B组为5.10 cm,差异同样无统计学意义(p = 0.23)。
FSLO的成功率为68.6%。上述独立变量均对两阶段FSLO的结果无任何影响。虽然VILO仍然是位于或靠近内环的IAT的首选治疗方法,但对于高于此位置的IAT,两阶段FSLO实现阴囊内睾丸下降固定术的机会更大。