Suppr超能文献

采用划消任务评估半侧忽略综合征:钟型测验与苹果测验的比较。

The assessment of hemineglect syndrome with cancellation tasks: a comparison between the Bells test and the Apples test.

机构信息

Cardinal Ferrari Rehabilitation Centre, S. Stefano Institute, via IV Novembre, 21, 43012, Fontanellato, Parma, Italy.

Tuscany Rehabilitation Clinic, Terranuova Bracciolini, Piazza del Volontariato, 2, 52025, Montevarchi, Arezzo, Italy.

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2017 Dec;38(12):2171-2176. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-3139-7. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

Abstract

Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is a frequent consequence of acquired brain injury, especially following right hemisphere damage. Traditionally, unilateral spatial neglect is assessed with cancellation tests such as the Bells test. Recently, a new cancellation test, the Apples test, has been proposed. The present study aims at comparing the accuracy of these two tests in detecting hemispatial neglect, on a sample of 56 right hemisphere stroke patients with a diagnosis of USN. In order to evaluate the agreement between the Apples and Bells tests, Cohen's kappa and McNemar's test were used to assess differences between the two methods of evaluation. Poor agreement and statistically significant differences emerged between the Apples and Bells tests. Overall, the Apples test was significantly more sensitive than the Bells test in detecting USN. Based on these results, the use of the Apples test for peripersonal neglect assessment is therefore highly recommended.

摘要

单侧空间忽略(USN)是获得性脑损伤的常见后果,尤其是在右半球损伤后。传统上,单侧空间忽略通过 Bell 测试等取消测试进行评估。最近,提出了一种新的取消测试,即 Apples 测试。本研究旨在比较这两种测试在检测半空间忽略方面的准确性,使用的样本是 56 名被诊断为单侧空间忽略的右半球中风患者。为了评估 Apples 测试和 Bell 测试之间的一致性,使用 Cohen 的 kappa 和 McNemar 的检验来评估两种评估方法之间的差异。Apples 测试和 Bell 测试之间的一致性较差,且差异具有统计学意义。总体而言,Apples 测试在检测 USN 方面比 Bell 测试更敏感。基于这些结果,强烈建议使用 Apples 测试进行近旁忽略评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验