Koetsawang S, Srisupandit S, Cole L P
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1978;15(5):455-8. doi: 10.1002/j.1879-3479.1977.tb00730.x.
From August 1975 through May 1976, a comparative study was made of the effects of sterilization by standard electrocoagulation and tubal ring application techniques. The two techniques were randomly assigned to 300 patients. Results show that standard electrocoagulation and tubal ring procedures can easily and safely be performed on an outpatient basis, using local anesthetics and analgesics. Rates of surgical complications for both techniques were clinically acceptable, although tubal risk patients had a higher rate. Pain during the procedure and during the immediate recovery period was more severe for tubal ring patients. Despite the higher incidence of surgical complications and pain associated with the ring, many physicians prefer this method of sterilization because it eliminates the possibility, inherent in electrocoagulation, of inadvertent serious electrical burns.
1975年8月至1976年5月,对标准电凝绝育术和输卵管环套术的效果进行了一项对比研究。这两种技术被随机分配给300名患者。结果表明,使用局部麻醉剂和镇痛药,标准电凝绝育术和输卵管环套术都可以在门诊轻松、安全地进行。两种技术的手术并发症发生率在临床上都是可以接受的,尽管输卵管高危患者的发生率更高。输卵管环套术患者在手术过程中和术后即刻恢复期的疼痛更为严重。尽管与输卵管环套术相关的手术并发症和疼痛发生率较高,但许多医生更喜欢这种绝育方法,因为它消除了电凝绝育术固有的意外严重电灼伤的可能性。