Suppr超能文献

认知和行动能力限制对老年人死亡率的单独和联合影响。

Individual and Combined Associations of Cognitive and Mobility Limitations on Mortality Risk in Older Adults.

机构信息

Physical Activity Epidemiology Laboratory, Exercise Psychology Laboratory, Department of Health, Exercise Science and Recreation Management, The University of Mississippi, University, Jackson.

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Oct;92(10):1494-1501. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.06.019.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential independent and combined associations of cognitive and mobility limitations on risk of all-cause mortality in a representative sample of the US older adult population who, at baseline, were free of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from the 1999 to 2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used to identify 1852 adults (age, 60-85 years) with and without mobility and/or cognitive limitations. Hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality risk were calculated for 4 mutually exclusive groups: no limitation (group 1 as reference), mobility limitation only (group 2), cognitive limitation only (group 3), both cognitive and mobility limitations (group 4).

RESULTS

Compared with group 1, the adjusted HRs (95% CI) for groups 2, 3, and 4 were 1.72 (1.24-2.38), 2.00 (1.37-2.91), and 2.18 (1.57-3.02), respectively. The mortality risk when comparing group 4 (HR, 2.18) with group 3 (HR, 2.00), however, was not statistically significant (P=.65). Similarly, the mortality risk when comparing group 4 (HR, 2.18) with group 2 (HR, 1.72) was not statistically significant (P=.16).

CONCLUSION

Although the highest mortality risk occurred in those with both limitations (group 4), this point estimate was not statistically significantly different when compared with those with cognitive or mobility limitations alone.

摘要

目的

评估认知和行动能力受限对无心血管和脑血管疾病的美国老年人群体全因死亡率的潜在独立和综合影响。

方法

使用 1999 年至 2002 年国家健康和营养调查的数据,确定了 1852 名有或没有行动和/或认知受限的成年人(年龄 60-85 岁)。对于 4 个相互排斥的组别,计算了死亡率风险的危险比(HR):无限制(第 1 组作为参考)、仅有行动限制(第 2 组)、仅有认知限制(第 3 组)、认知和行动限制均有(第 4 组)。

结果

与第 1 组相比,第 2、3 和 4 组调整后的 HR(95%CI)分别为 1.72(1.24-2.38)、2.00(1.37-2.91)和 2.18(1.57-3.02)。然而,第 4 组(HR,2.18)与第 3 组(HR,2.00)相比,死亡率风险差异无统计学意义(P=.65)。同样,第 4 组(HR,2.18)与第 2 组(HR,1.72)相比,死亡率风险差异也无统计学意义(P=.16)。

结论

尽管同时存在两种限制(第 4 组)的人群死亡率风险最高,但与仅有认知或行动限制的人群相比,这一估计值差异无统计学意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验