• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新加坡两剂人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of two-dose human papillomavirus vaccination in Singapore.

作者信息

Tay Sun Kuie, Lee Bee-Wah, Sohn Woo Yun, Lee I-Heng, Mathur Gaurav, Sanicas Melvin, Van Kriekinge Georges

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 2018 Jul;59(7):370-382. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017085. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

DOI:10.11622/smedj.2017085
PMID:28983579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6056373/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer is the tenth most common cancer and the eighth most frequent cause of death among women in Singapore. As human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the necessary cause of cervical cancer, the risk of cervical cancer can be substantially reduced through vaccination. This study was conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two-dose HPV vaccination as part of a national vaccination programme for 12-year-old girls in Singapore, from the perspective of the healthcare payer.

METHODS

A lifetime Markov cohort model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing the AS04-adjuvanted HPV-16/18 vaccine (AS04-HPV-16/18v) to the current cervical screening programme in Singapore. Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness of the AS04-HPV-16/18v was compared with the HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine (4vHPV). Model inputs were derived from local data, where possible, and validated by clinical experts in Singapore.

RESULTS

Introduction of the AS04-HPV-16/18v in Singapore was shown to prevent 137 cervical cancer cases and 48 cervical cancer deaths when compared with screening alone. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of SGD 12,645 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, which is cost-effective according to the World Health Organization threshold for Singapore. When discounted at 3%, AS04-HPV-16/18v was dominant over 4vHPV, with cost savings of SGD 80,559 and 28 additional QALYs gained. In the one-way sensitivity analysis, AS04-HPV-16/18v remained cost-effective compared with screening alone and dominant compared with 4vHPV.

CONCLUSION

AS04-HPV-16/18v is the most cost-effective choice for reducing the burden of cervical cancer through universal mass vaccination for 12-year-old girls in Singapore.

摘要

引言

宫颈癌是新加坡女性中第十大常见癌症,也是第八大常见死因。由于人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染是宫颈癌的必要病因,通过接种疫苗可大幅降低宫颈癌风险。本研究从医疗保健支付方的角度,评估两剂HPV疫苗接种作为新加坡针对12岁女孩的国家疫苗接种计划一部分的成本效益。

方法

采用终身马尔可夫队列模型,评估将含AS04佐剂的HPV-16/18疫苗(AS04-HPV-16/18v)引入新加坡当前宫颈癌筛查计划的成本效益。此外,将AS04-HPV-16/18v的成本效益与HPV-6/11/16/18疫苗(4vHPV)进行比较。模型输入尽可能源自本地数据,并经新加坡临床专家验证。

结果

与仅进行筛查相比,在新加坡引入AS04-HPV-16/18v可预防137例宫颈癌病例和48例宫颈癌死亡。这导致每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比为12,645新元,根据世界卫生组织对新加坡设定的阈值,这具有成本效益。按3%贴现时,AS04-HPV-16/18v相对于4vHPV具有优势,节省成本80,559新元,并多获得28个QALY。在单向敏感性分析中,与仅进行筛查相比,AS04-HPV-16/18v仍具有成本效益,与4vHPV相比具有优势。

结论

对于新加坡12岁女孩通过普遍大规模接种疫苗减轻宫颈癌负担而言,AS04-HPV-16/18v是最具成本效益的选择。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of two-dose human papillomavirus vaccination in Singapore.新加坡两剂人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的成本效益
Singapore Med J. 2018 Jul;59(7):370-382. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017085. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Adolescent Girls in Taiwan.台湾地区青春期女孩人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的成本效益分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 May 25;20(5):1377-1387. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.5.1377.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of AS04-adjuvanted human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine compared with human papillomavirus 6/11/16/18 vaccine in the Philippines, with the new 2-dose schedule.在菲律宾采用新的两剂次接种程序时,AS04佐剂人乳头瘤病毒16/18型疫苗与人乳头瘤病毒6/11/16/18型疫苗的成本效益分析
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 May 4;13(5):1158-1166. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1269991. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
4
Health economic analysis of human papillomavirus vaccines in women of Chile: perspective of the health care payer using a Markov model.智利女性人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的健康经济分析:基于马尔可夫模型的医疗保健支付方视角
BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 26;14:1222. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1222.
5
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Two Different Two-Dose Human Papillomavirus Vaccines in Malaysia.马来西亚两种不同两剂次人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的成本效益比较分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Apr 25;19(4):933-940. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.4.933.
6
Cost-Utility of a Two-Dose Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Programme Added to Cervical Cancer Screening Compared with Cervical Cancer Screening Alone in Korea.与韩国单纯宫颈癌筛查相比,在宫颈癌筛查中增加两剂人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种计划的成本效益分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Feb 26;20(2):425-435. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.425.
7
Incremental cost-effectiveness evaluation of vaccinating girls against cervical cancer pre- and post-sexual debut in Belgium.比利时对女孩进行宫颈癌疫苗接种的成本效益评价:性活跃前和性活跃后的影响
Vaccine. 2013 Aug 20;31(37):3962-71. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus vaccination in South Africa accounting for human immunodeficiency virus prevalence.在考虑人类免疫缺陷病毒流行率的情况下,对南非人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种进行成本效益分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Dec 11;15:566. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1295-z.
9
Modeling the impact of the difference in cross-protection data between a human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine and a human papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 vaccine in Canada.建模加拿大人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)-16/18 AS04 佐剂疫苗和人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)-6/11/16/18 疫苗之间交叉保护数据差异的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 13;12:872. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-872.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the introduction of the human papillomavirus vaccine in Honduras.在洪都拉斯引入人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的成本效益分析。
Vaccine. 2015 May 7;33 Suppl 1:A167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.067.

引用本文的文献

1
The Cost-Effectiveness of the Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination in Asia Pacific Countries: What Lessons Can Indonesia Learn?-A Systematic Review.亚太国家人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的成本效益:印度尼西亚能吸取哪些教训?-一项系统综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 May 30;13(6):593. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13060593.
2
Modelling epidemiological and economics processes - the case of cervical cancer.模拟流行病学和经济过程——以宫颈癌为例。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Feb 22;15(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00589-1.
3
Improved population coverage of the human papillomavirus vaccine after implementation of a school-based vaccination programme: the Singapore experience.实施基于学校的疫苗接种计划后,人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的人群覆盖率提高:新加坡的经验。
Singapore Med J. 2023 May;64(5):294-301. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2022053.
4
The cost-effectiveness of bivalent, quadrivalent, and nine-valent HPV vaccination in Asia: a systematic review.二价、四价和九价 HPV 疫苗接种在亚洲的成本效益:系统评价。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Jul;306(1):173-187. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06309-y. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
5
Landscape of vaccine access and health technology assessment role in decision-making process in ASEAN countries.东盟国家疫苗可及性概况及卫生技术评估在决策过程中的作用。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Jul 2;16(7):1728-1737. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1769388. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidance Document: Global Pharmacoeconomic Model Adaption Strategies.指导文件:全球药物经济学模型适应策略
Value Health Reg Issues. 2014 Dec;5:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 May 16.
2
Highest Vaccine Uptake after School-Based Delivery - A County-Level Evaluation of the Implementation Strategies for HPV Catch-Up Vaccination in Sweden.校内接种后疫苗接种率最高——瑞典县级人乳头瘤病毒补种疫苗实施策略评估
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0149857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149857. eCollection 2016.
3
Are the Two Human Papillomavirus Vaccines Really Similar? A Systematic Review of Available Evidence: Efficacy of the Two Vaccines against HPV.两种人乳头瘤病毒疫苗真的相似吗?现有证据的系统评价:两种疫苗对 HPV 的功效。
J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:435141. doi: 10.1155/2015/435141. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
4
Vaccine Misconceptions and Low HPV Vaccination Take-up Rates in Singapore.新加坡的疫苗误解与低人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种率
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(12):5119-24. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.12.5119.
5
Discounting in the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of a vaccination programme: A critical review.疫苗接种计划成本效益评估中的贴现:批判性综述。
Vaccine. 2015 Jul 31;33(32):3788-94. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.084. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
Factors affecting the uptake of cervical cancer screening among nurses in Singapore.影响新加坡护士宫颈癌筛查接受率的因素。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Sep;130(3):230-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.037. Epub 2015 May 23.
7
Long-term Cost-effectiveness of Statin Treatment for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Elderly.他汀类药物治疗对老年人心血管疾病一级预防的长期成本效益
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2015 Apr;29(2):187-97. doi: 10.1007/s10557-015-6584-7.
8
Does it matter? Discounting and its role in the cost-effectiveness of preventative interventions. The case of HPV vaccination.这重要吗?贴现及其在预防性干预措施成本效益中的作用。以人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种为例。
Public Health. 2015 Jul;129(7):989-92. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.02.028. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
9
An extended cost-effectiveness analysis of publicly financed HPV vaccination to prevent cervical cancer in China.中国公共财政资助的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗预防宫颈癌的扩展成本效益分析
Vaccine. 2015 Jun 4;33(24):2830-41. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.02.052. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
10
HPV vaccines to prevent cervical cancer and genital warts: an update.HPV 疫苗预防宫颈癌和生殖器疣:更新。
Vaccine. 2014 Mar 20;32(14):1595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.081.