Dalton Michael K, Fox Nicole M, Porter John M, Hazelton Joshua P
Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey.
Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey.
J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.076. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
Although most trauma centers have a regularly scheduled trauma clinic, research demonstrates that trauma patients do not consistently attend follow-up appointments and often use the emergency department (ED) for outpatient care.
A retrospective review of outpatient follow-up of adult patients admitted to the trauma service (January 2014-December 2014) at an urban level I trauma center was conducted (n = 2134).
A total of 219 patients (10%) were evaluated in trauma clinic after discharge from the hospital. Twenty-one percent of patients seen in trauma clinic visited the ED within 30 d compared with 12% of those not seen in clinic (P < 0.001). A total of 104 patients were readmitted within 30 d of discharge; no difference existed in the rate of hospital readmission between patients seen in clinic and those not seen in clinic (P = 0.25). Stepwise logistic regression showed that clinic follow-up was not a significant predictor of decreased ED utilization (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.16 [95% confidence interval 0.78-1.72], P = 0.461) and also showed that while ED use was a significant predictor of readmission (adjusted OR 216 [93-500], P < 0.001), clinic visits were not (adjusted OR 0.74 [0.33-1.69], P = 0.48).
Outpatient follow-up in the trauma clinic does not decrease ED utilization or hospital readmissions indicating that interventions aimed at improving access to a conventional outpatient clinic will not impact ED utilization rates. Further study is necessary to determine the best system for providing clinically appropriate and cost-effective outpatient follow-up for trauma patients.
尽管大多数创伤中心都设有定期的创伤门诊,但研究表明,创伤患者并非始终按时就诊,且常因门诊护理而前往急诊科(ED)。
对一家城市一级创伤中心创伤科收治的成年患者(2014年1月至2014年12月)的门诊随访情况进行回顾性分析(n = 2134)。
共有219名患者(10%)在出院后在创伤门诊接受了评估。在创伤门诊就诊的患者中有21%在30天内前往了急诊科,而未在门诊就诊的患者中这一比例为12%(P < 0.001)。共有104名患者在出院后30天内再次入院;在门诊就诊的患者和未在门诊就诊的患者之间,再次入院率没有差异(P = 0.25)。逐步逻辑回归显示,门诊随访并非减少急诊科就诊率的显著预测因素(调整后的优势比[OR]为1.16[95%置信区间0.78 - 1.72],P = 0.461),同时还显示,虽然急诊科就诊是再次入院的显著预测因素(调整后的OR为216[93 - 500],P < 0.001),但门诊就诊并非如此(调整后的OR为0.74[0.33 - 1.69],P = 0.48)。
创伤门诊的门诊随访并不能降低急诊科就诊率或再次入院率,这表明旨在改善传统门诊就诊机会的干预措施不会影响急诊科就诊率。有必要进行进一步研究,以确定为创伤患者提供临床适宜且具有成本效益的门诊随访的最佳系统。