• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Factors Influencing Nonadherence to Recommended Postdischarge Follow-Up After Trauma.影响创伤后遵医嘱进行出院后随访的因素。
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
2
Follow-Up Care Adherence After Hospital Discharge in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤患儿出院后的随访护理依从性
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 May/Jun;33(3):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000314.
3
The Center for Trauma Survivorship: Addressing the great unmet need for posttrauma center care.创伤后幸存者中心:满足创伤后中心护理的巨大未满足需求。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Nov;89(5):940-946. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002775.
4
Downstream hospital system effects of a comprehensive trauma recovery services program.一项综合创伤康复服务项目对下游医院系统的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Dec;89(6):1177-1182. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002872.
5
Center for Trauma Survivorship improves postdischarge follow-up and retention.创伤后生存中心改善了出院后的随访和保留率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Jul 1;93(1):118-123. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003634. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
6
Factors associated with trauma clinic follow-up compliance after discharge: experience at an urban Level I trauma center.与创伤门诊随访依从性相关的因素:城市一级创伤中心的经验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):185-90. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aafcd5.
7
Chronic consequences of acute injuries: worse survival after discharge.急性损伤的慢性后果:出院后生存率下降。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Sep;73(3):699-703. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318253b5db.
8
Trauma patient readmissions: Why do they come back for more?创伤患者再入院:他们为何再次入院?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Nov;79(5):717-24; discussion 724-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000844.
9
Gender differences in discharge destination among older adults following traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后老年人出院目的地的性别差异
Health Care Women Int. 2012;33(10):896-904. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2012.673654.
10
Outpatient follow-up does not prevent emergency department utilization by trauma patients.门诊随访并不能防止创伤患者使用急诊科。
J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.076. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Outpatient Follow-up After Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury at an Urban Safety Net Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.城市安全网医院儿科创伤性脑损伤后的门诊随访:一项回顾性队列研究
Childs Nerv Syst. 2025 Jul 10;41(1):228. doi: 10.1007/s00381-025-06893-3.
2
Risk factors and economic impact of long-term nursing care after major trauma.重大创伤后长期护理的风险因素及经济影响。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 18;13:1535784. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1535784. eCollection 2025.
3
Leveraging machine learning to enhance appointment adherence at a novel post-discharge care transition clinic.利用机器学习提高一家新型出院后护理过渡诊所的预约依从性。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Nov 9;7(4):ooae086. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae086. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Risk factors for loss to follow-up after traumatic injury: An updated view of a chronic problem.创伤后随访丢失的风险因素:慢性问题的最新观点。
Surgery. 2024 May;175(5):1445-1453. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.01.034. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
5
Transitional care programs for trauma patients: A scoping review.创伤患者过渡期护理方案:范围综述。
Surgery. 2023 Oct;174(4):1001-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.06.038. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
6
Health disparities in orthopedic trauma: a qualitative study examining providers' perspectives on barriers to care and recovery outcomes.骨科创伤中的健康差异:一项定性研究,探讨了提供者对护理障碍和康复结果的看法。
Soc Work Health Care. 2023 Jul-Dec;62(6-7):207-227. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2023.2205909. Epub 2023 May 4.
7
Barriers to accessing follow up care in post-hospitalized trauma patients in Moshi, Tanzania: A mixed methods study.坦桑尼亚莫希地区创伤后住院患者获得后续护理的障碍:一项混合方法研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun 13;2(6):e0000277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000277. eCollection 2022.
8
Post-Trauma Discharge Instructions: Are We Dropping the Ball?创伤后出院指导:我们是否忽视了这个问题?
Am Surg. 2023 Nov;89(11):4625-4631. doi: 10.1177/00031348221111515. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
9
"What Are My Injuries?" Health Literacy and Patient Comprehension of Trauma Care and Injuries.“我受了什么伤?”健康素养与患者对创伤护理和损伤的理解
J Surg Res. 2021 Dec;268:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.030. Epub 2021 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Satisfaction Is Improved With Exposure to Trauma Recovery Services.患者对创伤康复服务的满意度提高了。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Jul 15;28(14):597-605. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00266.
2
Improvement in Outpatient Follow-up With a Postdischarge Phone Call Intervention.带出院后电话干预的门诊随访改进。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Sep 15;28(18):e815-e822. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00132.
3
Implementing psychosocial programming at a level 1 trauma center: results from a 5-year period.在一级创伤中心实施社会心理规划:五年期结果
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020 Jan 21;5(1):e000363. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2019-000363. eCollection 2020.
4
Indianapolis Provider's Use Of Wraparound Services Associated With Reduced Hospitalizations And Emergency Department Visits.印第安纳波利斯提供者使用全面服务与减少住院和急诊就诊相关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Oct;37(10):1555-1561. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0075.
5
Trauma Transitional Care Coordination: protecting the most vulnerable trauma patients from hospital readmission.创伤过渡护理协调:保护最脆弱的创伤患者避免再次入院。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018 Feb 8;3(1):e000149. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000149. eCollection 2018.
6
Risk factors for 90-day readmission in veterans with inflammatory bowel disease-Does post-discharge follow-up matter?炎症性肠病退伍军人 90 天再入院的风险因素-出院后随访是否重要?
Mil Med Res. 2018 Feb 8;5(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40779-018-0153-x.
7
Hospital discharge documentation of a designated clinician for follow-up care and 30-day outcomes in hip fracture and stroke patients discharged to sub-acute care.指定临床医生的医院出院文件,用于对出院至亚急性护理机构的髋部骨折和中风患者进行后续护理及30天预后评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 9;18(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2907-2.
8
Outpatient follow-up does not prevent emergency department utilization by trauma patients.门诊随访并不能防止创伤患者使用急诊科。
J Surg Res. 2017 Oct;218:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.076. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
9
Incidental findings in blunt trauma patients: prevalence, follow-up documentation, and risk factors.钝性创伤患者的偶然发现:患病率、随访记录及危险因素。
Emerg Radiol. 2017 Aug;24(4):347-353. doi: 10.1007/s10140-017-1479-5. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
10
Relationship between Early Physician Follow-Up and 30-Day Readmission after Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure.急性心肌梗死和心力衰竭后早期医生随访与30天再入院之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170061. eCollection 2017.

影响创伤后遵医嘱进行出院后随访的因素。

Factors Influencing Nonadherence to Recommended Postdischarge Follow-Up After Trauma.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

MetroHealth Medical Center, Community Trauma Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.009
PMID:32707396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7854871/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Historically, trauma patients have low adherence to recommended outpatient follow-up plans, which is crucial for improved long-term clinical outcomes. We sought to identify characteristics associated with nonadherence to recommended outpatient follow-up visits.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective examination of inpatient trauma survivors admitted to a level 1 trauma center (March 2017-March 2018). Patients with known alternative follow-up were excluded. All outpatient visits within 1 y from the index admission were identified. The primary outcome was nonadherence, which was noted if a patient failed to follow-up for any specialty recommended in the discharge instructions. Factors for nonadherence studied included age, injury severity score, mechanism, length of stay, number of referrals made, and involvement with a Trauma Recovery Services program. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of498 patients were identified (69% men, median age 43 y [range, 26-58 y], median injury severity score 14 [range, 9-19]). Among them, 240 (47%) were nonadherent. The most common specialties recommended were orthopedic surgery (56% referred, 19% nonadherent), trauma (54% referred, 35% nonadherent), and neurosurgery (127 referred, 35% nonadherent). Lowest levels of follow-up were seen for nonsurgical referrals. In adjusted analysis, a higher number of referrals made (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95-3.05) and older age (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02) were associated with nonadherence. Trauma Recovery Service participants and penetrating trauma patients were more likely to be adherent (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

The largest contributor to nonadherence was the number of referrals made; patients who were referred to multiple specialists were more likely to be nonadherent. Peer support services may lower barriers to follow-up.

摘要

简介

历史上,创伤患者对推荐的门诊随访计划的依从性较低,而这对改善长期临床结局至关重要。我们试图确定与不遵守推荐的门诊随访就诊相关的特征。

方法

这是对 2017 年 3 月至 2018 年 3 月期间入住一级创伤中心的住院创伤幸存者进行的单中心回顾性检查。排除已知有其他替代随访的患者。确定了从入院索引开始的 1 年内所有的门诊就诊情况。主要结局为不依从,即如果患者未能按照出院医嘱中推荐的任何专科进行随访。研究的不依从因素包括年龄、损伤严重程度评分、机制、住院时间、转科次数以及是否参与创伤康复服务项目。进行了单变量和逻辑回归分析。

结果

共确定了 498 例患者(69%为男性,中位年龄 43 岁[范围:26-58 岁],中位损伤严重程度评分 14 分[范围:9-19 分])。其中,240 例(47%)不依从。推荐的最常见专科包括骨科(56%转诊,19%不依从)、创伤科(54%转诊,35%不依从)和神经外科(127 例转诊,35%不依从)。非手术转诊的随访率最低。在调整分析中,转科次数较多(比值比[OR],2.45;95%置信区间[CI],1.95-3.05)和年龄较大(OR,1.01;95%CI,1.00-1.02)与不依从相关。参与创伤康复服务项目和穿透性创伤的患者更可能依从(OR,0.60;95%CI,0.37-0.97)。

结论

不依从的最大原因是转科次数较多;被转诊到多个专科的患者更有可能不依从。同伴支持服务可能会降低随访障碍。