Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
MetroHealth Medical Center, Community Trauma Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:143-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
Historically, trauma patients have low adherence to recommended outpatient follow-up plans, which is crucial for improved long-term clinical outcomes. We sought to identify characteristics associated with nonadherence to recommended outpatient follow-up visits.
This is a single-center retrospective examination of inpatient trauma survivors admitted to a level 1 trauma center (March 2017-March 2018). Patients with known alternative follow-up were excluded. All outpatient visits within 1 y from the index admission were identified. The primary outcome was nonadherence, which was noted if a patient failed to follow-up for any specialty recommended in the discharge instructions. Factors for nonadherence studied included age, injury severity score, mechanism, length of stay, number of referrals made, and involvement with a Trauma Recovery Services program. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were performed.
A total of498 patients were identified (69% men, median age 43 y [range, 26-58 y], median injury severity score 14 [range, 9-19]). Among them, 240 (47%) were nonadherent. The most common specialties recommended were orthopedic surgery (56% referred, 19% nonadherent), trauma (54% referred, 35% nonadherent), and neurosurgery (127 referred, 35% nonadherent). Lowest levels of follow-up were seen for nonsurgical referrals. In adjusted analysis, a higher number of referrals made (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95-3.05) and older age (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02) were associated with nonadherence. Trauma Recovery Service participants and penetrating trauma patients were more likely to be adherent (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97).
The largest contributor to nonadherence was the number of referrals made; patients who were referred to multiple specialists were more likely to be nonadherent. Peer support services may lower barriers to follow-up.
历史上,创伤患者对推荐的门诊随访计划的依从性较低,而这对改善长期临床结局至关重要。我们试图确定与不遵守推荐的门诊随访就诊相关的特征。
这是对 2017 年 3 月至 2018 年 3 月期间入住一级创伤中心的住院创伤幸存者进行的单中心回顾性检查。排除已知有其他替代随访的患者。确定了从入院索引开始的 1 年内所有的门诊就诊情况。主要结局为不依从,即如果患者未能按照出院医嘱中推荐的任何专科进行随访。研究的不依从因素包括年龄、损伤严重程度评分、机制、住院时间、转科次数以及是否参与创伤康复服务项目。进行了单变量和逻辑回归分析。
共确定了 498 例患者(69%为男性,中位年龄 43 岁[范围:26-58 岁],中位损伤严重程度评分 14 分[范围:9-19 分])。其中,240 例(47%)不依从。推荐的最常见专科包括骨科(56%转诊,19%不依从)、创伤科(54%转诊,35%不依从)和神经外科(127 例转诊,35%不依从)。非手术转诊的随访率最低。在调整分析中,转科次数较多(比值比[OR],2.45;95%置信区间[CI],1.95-3.05)和年龄较大(OR,1.01;95%CI,1.00-1.02)与不依从相关。参与创伤康复服务项目和穿透性创伤的患者更可能依从(OR,0.60;95%CI,0.37-0.97)。
不依从的最大原因是转科次数较多;被转诊到多个专科的患者更有可能不依从。同伴支持服务可能会降低随访障碍。