Suppr超能文献

疫苗犹豫沟通:什么才是证据。

Vaccine hesitancy communication: What counts as evidence.

机构信息

Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Global Health Communication Center, Cavanaugh Hall 309, 425 University Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2018 Oct 22;36(44):6529-6530. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.064. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

Abstract

The evidence base for vaccine hesitancy communication is generally confined to research focused on the content of the message rather than the process of communication. This has important consequences, because shifting focus to encompass the process of communicating, and not just on the content of content message being conveyed; opens the possibility of greater insight and understanding regarding the conversation health care workers have with those who are vaccine hesitant, creating increased chances of acceptance.

摘要

疫苗犹豫沟通的证据基础通常仅限于专注于信息内容而不是沟通过程的研究。这具有重要的意义,因为将重点转移到沟通过程上,而不仅仅是正在传达的信息内容上,为更深入地了解和理解医疗保健工作者与那些对疫苗犹豫不决的人之间的对话创造了可能性,从而增加了被接受的机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验