Silachev D N, Usatikova E A, Pevzner I B, Zorova L D, Babenko V A, Gulyaev M V, Pirogov Yu A, Plotnikov E Yu, Zorov D B
Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia.
Biochemistry (Mosc). 2017 Sep;82(9):1006-1016. doi: 10.1134/S0006297917090036.
Remote ischemic preconditioning of hind limbs (RIPC) is an effective method for preventing brain injury resulting from ischemia. However, in numerous studies RIPC has been used on the background of administered anesthetics, which also could exhibit neuroprotective properties. Therefore, investigation of the signaling pathways triggered by RIPC and the effect of anesthetics is important. In this study, we explored the effect of anesthetics (chloral hydrate and Zoletil) on the ability of RIPC to protect the brain from injury caused by ischemia and reperfusion. We found that RIPC without anesthesia resulted in statistically significant decrease in neurological deficit 24 h after ischemia, but did not affect the volume of brain injury. Administration of chloral hydrate or Zoletil one day prior to brain ischemia produced a preconditioning effect by their own, decreasing the degree of neurological deficit and lowering the volume of infarct with the use of Zoletil. The protective effects observed after RIPC with chloral hydrate or Zoletil were similar to those observed when only the respective anesthetic was used. RIPC was accompanied by significant increase in the level of brain proteins associated with the induction of ischemic tolerance such as pGSK-3β, BDNF, and HSP70. However, Zoletil did not affect the level of these proteins 24 h after injection, and chloral hydrate caused increase of only pGSK-3β. We conclude that RIPC, chloral hydrate, and Zoletil produce a significant neuroprotective effect, but the simultaneous use of anesthetics with RIPC does not enhance the degree of neuroprotection.
后肢远程缺血预处理(RIPC)是预防缺血性脑损伤的有效方法。然而,在众多研究中,RIPC是在使用麻醉剂的背景下进行的,而麻醉剂本身也可能具有神经保护特性。因此,研究RIPC触发的信号通路以及麻醉剂的作用具有重要意义。在本研究中,我们探讨了麻醉剂(水合氯醛和佐乐定)对RIPC保护大脑免受缺血再灌注损伤能力的影响。我们发现,无麻醉的RIPC导致缺血24小时后神经功能缺损在统计学上显著降低,但不影响脑损伤体积。在脑缺血前一天给予水合氯醛或佐乐定本身会产生预处理作用,使用佐乐定时可降低神经功能缺损程度并减小梗死体积。使用水合氯醛或佐乐定进行RIPC后观察到的保护作用与仅使用相应麻醉剂时观察到的作用相似。RIPC伴随着与诱导缺血耐受相关的脑蛋白水平显著升高,如pGSK-3β、BDNF和HSP70。然而,注射后24小时佐乐定不影响这些蛋白的水平,水合氯醛仅导致pGSK-3β升高。我们得出结论,RIPC、水合氯醛和佐乐定都具有显著的神经保护作用,但麻醉剂与RIPC同时使用并不会增强神经保护程度。