Suppr超能文献

减少锐器伤:一项为期六年的三阶段研究,比较在病房使用小型锐器处理容器与大型特制容器的情况。

Sharps injury reduction: a six-year, three-phase study comparing use of a small patient-room sharps disposal container with a larger engineered container.

作者信息

Grimmond T, Naisoro W

机构信息

Grimmond and Associates Microbiology Consultants, New Zealand.

Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney Australia.

出版信息

J Infect Prev. 2014 Sep;15(5):170-174. doi: 10.1177/1757177414543088.

Abstract

A 350-bed Sydney hospital noted excessive container-associated sharps injuries (CASI) using small sharps containers and compared the effect from 2004 to 2010 of using a larger container engineered to reduce CASI. In Phase 1 (Ph1), disposable 1.4L containers (BD Australia) were carried to/from patients' rooms. In Phase 2 (Ph2), this stopped and a safety-engineered 32L reusable container (the Device; Sharpsmart, SteriHealth) was mounted in medication stations only and sharps were carried to and from patient rooms using kidney dishes. In Phase 3 (Ph3), the Device was wall-mounted in patient rooms. Sharps injuries were categorised as 'during-procedure', 'after-procedure but before disposal', 'CASI', and 'improper disposal SI'. Disposal-related SI comprised CASI plus improper-disposal SI. Injuries per 100 full-time-equivalent staff were analysed using Chi; ≤ 0.05; and relative risk and 95% confidence limits were calculated. In Ph1 (small containers) 19.4% of SI were CASI and transport injuries were zero. In Ph2 (Device in medication station) CASI fell 94.9% ( <0.001); Disposal-related SI fell 71.1% (=0.002) but transport injuries rose significantly. In Ph3 (Device in patient room) zero CASI occurred (<0.001); Disposal-related SI fell 83.1% (=0.001). Recapping SI fell 85.1% (=0.01) with the Device. The Device's volume, large aperture, passive overfill-protection and close-at-hand siting are postulated as SI reduction factors.

摘要

一家拥有350张床位的悉尼医院发现,使用小型锐器容器时与容器相关的锐器伤(CASI)过多,并比较了2004年至2010年使用一种旨在减少CASI的更大容器的效果。在第1阶段(Ph1),将一次性1.4升容器(BD澳大利亚公司)运送到患者房间并从患者房间运出。在第2阶段(Ph2),停止了这种做法,仅在配药站安装了一个经过安全设计的32升可重复使用容器(该装置;Sharpsmart,SteriHealth),并使用肾形盘将锐器运送到患者房间和从患者房间运出。在第3阶段(Ph3),该装置安装在患者房间的墙上。锐器伤被分类为“操作期间”、“操作后但在处置前”、“CASI ”以及 “不当处置锐器伤(SI)”。与处置相关的锐器伤包括CASI加上不当处置锐器伤。使用卡方检验分析每100名全职等效工作人员的受伤情况;P≤0.05;并计算相对风险和95%置信区间。在Ph1(小型容器)中,19.4%的锐器伤是CASI,运输伤为零。在Ph2(装置在配药站)中,CASI下降了94.9%(P<0.001);与处置相关 的锐器伤下降了71.1%(P=0.002),但运输伤显著增加。在Ph3(装置在患者房间)中,未发生CASI(P<0.001);与处置相关的锐器伤下降了83.1%(P=0.001)。使用该装置后,重新盖帽锐器伤下降了85.1%(P=0.01)。该装置的容量、大口径、被动防溢流保护和近在手边的位置被假定为锐器伤减少因素。

相似文献

2
Sharps injury reduction using Sharpsmart--a reusable sharps management system.
J Hosp Infect. 2003 Jul;54(3):232-8. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00141-5.
7
Sharps disposal containers.锐器处理容器。
Health Devices. 2003 Jul;32(7):253-72.

本文引用的文献

3
Needlestick injuries to the feet of Japanese healthcare workers: a culture-specific exposure risk.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;28(2):215-8. doi: 10.1086/510802. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
5
Sharps injury reduction using Sharpsmart--a reusable sharps management system.
J Hosp Infect. 2003 Jul;54(3):232-8. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00141-5.
7
Sharp practice.不正当手段
Nurs Times. 2001;97(2):22-4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验