• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Outbreak Column 16: Cognitive errors in outbreak decision making.突发情况专栏16:突发情况决策中的认知错误。
J Infect Prev. 2015 Jan;16(1):32-38. doi: 10.1177/1757177414562057. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
2
Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy.医学决策中的认知偏差与启发式方法:运用系统检索策略的批判性综述
Med Decis Making. 2015 May;35(4):539-57. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14547740. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
3
Heuristic reasoning and cognitive biases: Are they hindrances to judgments and decision making in orthodontics?启发式推理和认知偏差:它们是否会阻碍正畸学中的判断和决策?
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Mar;139(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.018.
4
The Impact of Cognitive and Implicit Bias on Patient Safety and Quality.认知和隐性偏见对患者安全与质量的影响。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019 Feb;52(1):35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
5
Clinical decision making in physical therapy - Exploring the 'heuristic' in clinical practice.物理治疗中的临床决策——探索临床实践中的“启发法”
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022 Dec;62:102674. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102674. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
6
The Influence of Cognitive Heuristics and Biases on Palliative Social Workers' Support of Patient and Caregiver Decision Making: The Pulse Oximeter Buying Trend during the COVID-19 Pandemic.认知启发式和偏差对缓和医疗社会工作者支持患者和照护者决策的影响:COVID-19 大流行期间脉搏血氧仪购买趋势。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2021 Apr-Sep;17(2-3):186-197. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2021.1910108. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
7
Heuristics and Cognitive Error in Medical Imaging.医学影像学中的启发式和认知错误。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 May;210(5):1097-1105. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18907. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
8
Biases and Heuristics in Decision Making and Their Impact on Autonomy.决策中的偏见和启发式及其对自主性的影响。
Am J Bioeth. 2016 May;16(5):5-15. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1159750.
9
Decision Making: Healthy Heuristics and Betraying Biases.决策制定:健康启发式与偏见背叛
Crit Care Clin. 2022 Jan;38(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2021.07.002.
10
Can We Do Better Next Time? Italians' Response to the COVID-19 Emergency through a Heuristics and Biases Lens.下次我们能做得更好吗?意大利人通过启发式与偏差视角对新冠疫情紧急情况的应对。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Feb 7;12(2):39. doi: 10.3390/bs12020039.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between universal gloving and healthcare-associated infections: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.普遍戴手套与医源性感染的关联:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;40(7):755-760. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.123. Epub 2019 May 17.
2
Outbreak column 17: Situational Awareness for healthcare outbreaks.疫情专栏17:医疗机构疫情的态势感知
J Infect Prev. 2015 Sep;16(5):222-229. doi: 10.1177/1757177415588379. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study.麻醉学中的认知错误:文献回顾与初步研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Feb;108(2):229-35. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer387. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
2
Diffusing aviation innovations in a hospital in The Netherlands.在荷兰一家医院推广航空创新成果。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 Aug;36(8):339-47. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36051-x.
3
Identifying and avoiding bias in research.识别和避免研究中的偏见。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug;126(2):619-625. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc.
4
Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of statistical process control charts and structured diagnostic tools to reduce ward-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the CHART Project.统计过程控制图和结构化诊断工具用于减少病房获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的多中心随机对照试验结果:CHART项目
J Hosp Infect. 2008 Oct;70(2):127-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.06.013. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
5
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
6
Crew resource management and team training.机组资源管理与团队培训。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2007 Jun;25(2):283-300. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2007.03.011.
7
Introducing the ORION Statement, a CONSORT equivalent for infection control studies.介绍ORION声明,这是一份与CONSORT等效的感染控制研究声明。
J Hosp Infect. 2007 Jun;65 Suppl 2:85-7. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(07)60021-8.
8
The checklist--a tool for error management and performance improvement.检查表——一种用于错误管理和绩效改进的工具。
J Crit Care. 2006 Sep;21(3):231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.06.002.
9
Objective measures of situation awareness in a simulated medical environment.模拟医疗环境中态势感知的客观测量。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i65-71. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i65.
10
How to spot bias and other potential problems in randomised controlled trials.如何在随机对照试验中发现偏倚及其他潜在问题。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;75(2):181-7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.025833.

突发情况专栏16:突发情况决策中的认知错误。

Outbreak Column 16: Cognitive errors in outbreak decision making.

作者信息

Curran Evonne T

机构信息

NHS National Services Scotland, Health Protection Scotland, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

J Infect Prev. 2015 Jan;16(1):32-38. doi: 10.1177/1757177414562057. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1177/1757177414562057
PMID:28989396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5074132/
Abstract

During outbreaks, decisions must be made without all the required information. People, including infection prevention and control teams (IPCTs), who have to make decisions during uncertainty use heuristics to fill the missing data gaps. Heuristics are mental model short cuts that by-and-large enable us to make good decisions quickly. However, these heuristics contain biases and effects that at times lead to cognitive (thinking) errors. These cognitive errors are not made to deliberately misrepresent any given situation; we are subject to heuristic biases when we are trying to perform optimally. The science of decision making is large; there are over 100 different biases recognised and described. Outbreak Column 16 discusses and relates these heuristics and biases to decision making during outbreak prevention, preparedness and management. Insights as to how we might recognise and avoid them are offered.

摘要

在疫情爆发期间,必须在没有所有所需信息的情况下做出决策。包括感染预防与控制团队(IPCTs)在内的人员,在不确定性情况下不得不做出决策时,会使用启发法来填补缺失的数据空白。启发法是一种心理模型捷径,大体上能使我们迅速做出正确决策。然而,这些启发法存在偏差和效应,有时会导致认知(思维)错误。这些认知错误并非故意歪曲任何特定情况;当我们试图实现最佳表现时,就会受到启发式偏差的影响。决策科学的范畴很大;已识别和描述的不同偏差超过100种。《疫情专栏16》讨论了这些启发法和偏差,并将其与疫情预防、准备和管理过程中的决策联系起来。还提供了关于我们如何识别和避免这些偏差的见解。