Gordon Anne, Davis Penelope J, Patterson Susan, Pepping Christopher A, Scott James G, Salter Kerri, Connell Melissa
Metro North Mental Health, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Herston, Queensland, Australia.
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, Queensland, Australia.
Br J Clin Psychol. 2018 Mar;57(1):116-130. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12161. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
Social Cognition and Interaction Training (SCIT) has demonstrated effectiveness in improving social cognition and functioning of people with schizophrenia. This pilot study examines the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of SCIT with individuals who have schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and are receiving care through a public mental health service.
In a pragmatic randomized waitlist controlled trial, 36 participants (aged 19-55 years) with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder were randomly allocated to SCIT or treatment as usual (TAU). Measures of theory of mind, emotion perception, attributional bias, social skills, quality of life, life skills, depression, anxiety, and stress were administered pre- and post-intervention with follow-up conducted 4 months later. All wait-list controls subsequently received the intervention and a secondary within-group analysis was conducted including these participants.
While no significant differences were found between groups on any outcomes, there was strong engagement with the SCIT intervention. Of the 21 participants in the intervention group, the completion rate was 85.71% with a median attendance rate of 17 sessions. Within subject analyses of SCIT participants over time showed significant improvements in quality of life, emotion recognition, social skills, and a trend towards better life skills from pre- to post-intervention. These gains were sustained at the 4-month follow-up time.
Although this study showed limited benefits in outcomes associated with SCIT compared with TAU, it demonstrated the acceptability of SCIT to participants in a real world public health setting shown by high retention, attendance, and positive feedback. This pilot shows SCIT can be implemented in routine clinical practice and lays the foundation for a larger pragmatic study.
SCIT can be implemented successfully in a real-world community mental health setting. SCIT had high levels of acceptability to these participants. Limitations The small sample size meant there was insufficient power to detect differences between groups on outcome measures. The study did not include measures of psychiatric symptoms or neuropsychological functioning which may have influenced participants' capacity to benefit from SCIT.
社会认知与互动训练(SCIT)已被证明在改善精神分裂症患者的社会认知和功能方面有效。这项试点研究考察了SCIT对于患有精神分裂症谱系障碍且通过公共心理健康服务接受治疗的个体的可接受性、可行性和有效性。
在一项实用的随机等待列表对照试验中,36名年龄在19至55岁之间、患有精神分裂症谱系障碍的参与者被随机分配至SCIT组或常规治疗(TAU)组。在干预前后以及4个月后的随访中,对心理理论、情绪感知、归因偏差、社交技能、生活质量、生活技能、抑郁、焦虑和压力等指标进行了测量。所有等待列表对照组随后都接受了干预,并进行了包括这些参与者在内的二次组内分析。
虽然在任何结果指标上两组之间均未发现显著差异,但参与者对SCIT干预的参与度很高。干预组的21名参与者中,完成率为85.71%,平均出席次数为17次。对SCIT参与者随时间进行的组内分析显示,从干预前到干预后,生活质量、情绪识别、社交技能有显著改善,生活技能也有改善趋势。这些改善在4个月的随访期内得以维持。
尽管本研究显示与TAU相比,SCIT在相关结果方面的益处有限,但它通过高保留率、出席率和积极反馈表明了SCIT在现实世界公共卫生环境中对参与者的可接受性。这项试点研究表明SCIT可以在常规临床实践中实施,并为更大规模的实用研究奠定了基础。
SCIT可以在现实世界的社区心理健康环境中成功实施。SCIT对这些参与者具有很高的可接受性。局限性样本量小意味着没有足够的效力来检测组间在结果指标上的差异。该研究未纳入可能影响参与者从SCIT中获益能力的精神症状或神经心理功能测量指标。