• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺的磁共振成像与靶向活检:PI-RADS与 Gleason分级的比较

Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate and targeted biopsy, Comparison of PIRADS and Gleason grading.

作者信息

Bastian-Jordan Matthew

机构信息

Queensland Xray, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Apr;62(2):183-187. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12678. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1111/1754-9485.12678
PMID:28990727
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has become integral in the investigation of suspected prostate cancer. Regions of interest are graded using the PIRADS scoring system, and in our institution, lesions graded as PIRADS 3-5 undergo sampling by MRI-guided biopsy. Limited data currently exists on PIRADS grading and biopsy results.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 343 MRI-guided biopsies (MRGB) performed between April 2013 and December 2016 was conducted. This included patients irrespective of whether they were biopsy naïve, biopsy negative or known low-grade malignancy. A Gleason score (G) >= 3+4 was considered to reflect clinically significant disease (CSD).

RESULTS

Of the 18 PIRADS 2 cases (at referrer request) who went to biopsy, 16 were negative and two had small volume Gleason 6 cancer. A total of 75 PIRADS 3 cases were biopsied with 88% negative or small volume Gleason 6 cancer, only 12% yielded ≥ G 3+4. Of the 133 PIRADS 4 lesions, 24% were negative, 25% were G6 and 51% were ≥ G 3+4. A total of 117 PIRADS 5 cases were biopsied with 7% negative, 13% Gleason 6 and 80% considered significant (≥ G 3+4). Of all biopsies, 230 (67%) had a positive result (≥ G6) with 171 of these (75%) being considered CSD, with overall CSD of 50% (171/343).

CONCLUSIONS

This paper demonstrates the incidence of CSD for different PIRADS grades. The low incidence of CSD in PIRADS 3 lesions suggests that in low clinical risk men, follow up in priority to biopsy may be an alternative treatment pathway.

摘要

引言

前列腺多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)已成为疑似前列腺癌检查中不可或缺的一部分。使用前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)评分系统对感兴趣区域进行分级,在我们机构中,PIRADS 3 - 5级病变通过MRI引导活检进行采样。目前关于PIRADS分级和活检结果的数据有限。

方法

对2013年4月至2016年12月期间进行的343例MRI引导活检(MRGB)进行回顾性分析。这包括无论是否初次活检、活检阴性或已知低级别恶性肿瘤的患者。Gleason评分(G)≥3 + 4被认为反映临床显著疾病(CSD)。

结果

在应转诊医生要求进行活检的18例PIRADS 2级病例中,16例为阴性,2例有小体积Gleason 6级癌。总共75例PIRADS 3级病例接受活检,88%为阴性或小体积Gleason 6级癌,只有12%的病例Gleason评分≥3 + 4。在133例PIRADS 4级病变中,24%为阴性,25%为G6级,51%为Gleason评分≥3 + 4。总共117例PIRADS 5级病例接受活检,7%为阴性,13%为Gleason 6级,80%被认为具有临床意义(Gleason评分≥3 + 4)。在所有活检病例中,230例(67%)结果为阳性(Gleason评分≥6),其中171例(75%)被认为是CSD,总体CSD发生率为50%(171/343)。

结论

本文展示了不同PIRADS分级的CSD发生率。PIRADS 3级病变中CSD发生率较低,这表明在临床风险较低的男性中,活检前优先进行随访可能是一种替代治疗途径。

相似文献

1
Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate and targeted biopsy, Comparison of PIRADS and Gleason grading.前列腺的磁共振成像与靶向活检:PI-RADS与 Gleason分级的比较
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Apr;62(2):183-187. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12678. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
2
In-gantry MRI guided prostate biopsy diagnosis of prostatitis and its relationship with PIRADS V.2 based score.机架内磁共振成像引导下前列腺炎的前列腺活检诊断及其与基于前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版评分的关系
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017 Apr;61(2):212-215. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12555. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
3
Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging monitoring patients in active surveillance for prostate cancer: a prospective cohort study.多参数磁共振成像监测前列腺癌主动监测患者:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Scand J Urol. 2018 Feb;52(1):8-13. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1409265. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
4
Which scores need a core? An evaluation of MR-targeted biopsy yield by PIRADS score across different biopsy indications.哪些评分需要核心?不同活检指征下 PIRADS 评分对 MR 靶向活检效能的评估。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Nov;21(4):573-578. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0065-6. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
5
Comparison of PIRADS 3 lesions with histopathological findings after MRI-fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate in a real world-setting.在真实临床环境中,对前列腺MRI融合靶向活检后PIRADS 3类病变与组织病理学结果的比较。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;71(2):165-170. doi: 10.3233/CH-189407.
6
Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study.在未经活检的患者中,与非靶向系统活检相比,MRI 引导的靶向和系统活检的癌症检出率优于无 MRI 的非靶向系统活检:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Urol. 2018 May 30;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0361-4.
7
MR-targeted TRUS prostate biopsy using local reference augmentation: initial experience.使用局部参考增强的磁共振成像靶向经直肠超声引导前列腺活检:初步经验
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Jul;48(7):1037-45. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1283-2. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
8
Review of the accuracy of multi-parametric MRI prostate in detecting prostate cancer within a local reporting service.多参数 MRI 前列腺在本地报告服务中检测前列腺癌的准确性评价。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jun;64(3):379-384. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13029. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
9
Gleason Score within Prostate Abnormal Areas Defined by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Did Not Vary According to the PIRADS Score.多参数磁共振成像定义的前列腺异常区域内的Gleason评分并不随前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)评分而变化。
Urol Int. 2017;99(2):156-161. doi: 10.1159/000468947. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
10
Further reduction of disqualification rates by additional MRI-targeted biopsy with transperineal saturation biopsy compared with standard 12-core systematic biopsies for the selection of prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.与标准的12针系统活检相比,经会阴饱和活检联合额外的MRI靶向活检进一步降低了前列腺癌患者主动监测的不合格率。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Sep;19(3):283-91. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.16. Epub 2016 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported outcome measures for pain and tolerability of transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia using the PrecisionPoint™ transperineal access system: A prospective study for a real-world patient experience.使用PrecisionPoint™经会阴穿刺系统对局部麻醉下经会阴前列腺活检的疼痛和耐受性进行患者报告结局测量:一项关于真实患者体验的前瞻性研究。
Investig Clin Urol. 2025 Jul;66(4):311-319. doi: 10.4111/icu.20250077.
2
Correction: Can we rely on magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection and surgical planning? Comprehensive analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing transperineal mapped biopsies.更正:我们能否依靠磁共振成像进行前列腺癌检测和手术规划?对大量接受经会阴定位活检的患者进行的综合分析。
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 12;43(1):164. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05534-3.
3
The Value of Digital Rectal Examination (DRE) in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics.直肠指检(DRE)在前列腺癌诊断中的价值。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 9;16(12):e75390. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75390. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Can we rely on magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection and surgical planning? Comprehensive analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing transperineal mapped biopsies.能否依靠磁共振成像进行前列腺癌检测和手术规划?经会阴靶向穿刺活检的大样本患者综合分析。
World J Urol. 2024 Sep 30;42(1):548. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05233-5.
5
Comparison of Early Contrast Enhancement Models in Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌超快动态对比增强磁共振成像中早期对比增强模型的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Apr 23;14(9):870. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14090870.
6
Should PI-RADS 3 be Subclassified According to ADC Values in the Transition Zone?前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)3类在移行区是否应根据表观扩散系数(ADC)值进行亚分类?
Curr Health Sci J. 2023 Oct-Dec;49(4):564-570. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.49.04.12. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
7
Is the Ellipsoid Formula Reliable in Prostate MRI?椭球体公式在前列腺MRI中是否可靠?
Curr Health Sci J. 2023 Oct-Dec;49(4):530-535. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.49.04.8. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
8
PI-RADS upgrading as the strongest predictor for the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with initial PI-RADS-3 lesions.PI-RADS 升级是初始 PI-RADS-3 病变患者中存在临床显著前列腺癌的最强预测因子。
World J Urol. 2024 Feb 16;42(1):84. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04776-x.
9
Pilot study for generating and assessing nomograms and decision curves analysis to predict clinically significant prostate cancer using only spatially registered multi-parametric MRI.仅使用空间配准的多参数磁共振成像生成和评估列线图及决策曲线分析以预测临床显著前列腺癌的初步研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 24;13:1066498. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1066498. eCollection 2023.
10
Assessing and testing anomaly detection for finding prostate cancer in spatially registered multi-parametric MRI.评估和测试用于在空间配准的多参数磁共振成像中发现前列腺癌的异常检测方法。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 5;12:1033323. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1033323. eCollection 2022.