• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

能否依靠磁共振成像进行前列腺癌检测和手术规划?经会阴靶向穿刺活检的大样本患者综合分析。

Can we rely on magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection and surgical planning? Comprehensive analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing transperineal mapped biopsies.

机构信息

Urology Department. Urosalud. La Salud Hospital, Valencia, 46021, Spain.

Urology Department, Valencian Institute of Oncology Foundation (FIVO), Valencia, 46009, Spain.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2024 Sep 30;42(1):548. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05233-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-05233-5
PMID:39347947
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate MRI and histological concordance in prostate cancer (PCa) identification via mapped transperineal biopsies.

METHODOLOGY

Retrospective per-lesion analysis of patients undergoing MRI and transperineal biopsy at the Valencian Institute of Oncology (2016-2024) using CAPROSIVO PCa data. Patients underwent MRI, with or without regions of interest (ROI), followed by transperineal biopsies (3-5 cores/ROI, 20-30 systematic). Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated, considering PI-RADS 3 lesions as positive or negative. Gleason Grade Group (GG) > 1 defined clinically significant PCa (csPCa).

RESULTS

1817 lesions were analyzed from 1325 patients (median age 67, median PSA 6.3 ng/ml). 53% MRI were negative, GG > 1 prevalence was 38.4%. MRI-negative cases showed varying PCa rates: 57.4% negative, 30.2% GG 1, and 12.4% GG > 1. PI-RADS 3 lesions had mixed outcomes: 45.6% benign, 13.1% GG 1, and 41.3% GG > 1. 9.2% PI-RADS 4-5 lesions were negative, 9% GG 1, and 81.7% GG > 1. For PI-RADS 3 lesions considered positive, Se, Sp, NPV, PPV, and AUC were 82.9%, 75%, 87.6%, 67.4%, and 0.79 respectively. Considering PI-RADS 3 as negative yielded 64.8% Se, 91% Sp, 80.6% NPV, 81.7% PPV, and 0.78 AUC.

CONCLUSION

MRI and mapped prostate biopsies exhibited moderate concordance. MRI could miss up to one in five csPCa foci and misinterpret one in three ROIs. Careful MRI interpretation is crucial for optimizing patient care.

摘要

目的

通过经会阴映射活检评估 MRI 与前列腺癌(PCa)识别的一致性。

方法

对 2016 年至 2024 年期间在瓦伦西亚肿瘤研究所接受 MRI 和经会阴活检的患者进行回顾性每病灶分析,使用 CAPROSIVO PCa 数据。患者行 MRI 检查,可联合或不联合感兴趣区(ROI),随后进行经会阴活检(每 ROI 3-5 针,共 20-30 针系统性活检)。考虑 PI-RADS 3 病变为阳性或阴性,计算灵敏度(Se)、特异性(Sp)、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)和曲线下面积(AUC)。GG>1 定义为有临床意义的 PCa(csPCa)。

结果

共分析了 1325 例患者的 1817 个病灶(中位年龄 67 岁,中位 PSA 6.3ng/ml)。53%的 MRI 为阴性,GG>1 的患病率为 38.4%。MRI 阴性病例的 PCa 检出率各不相同:57.4%阴性,30.2%GG1,12.4%GG>1。PI-RADS 3 病变的结果也各不相同:45.6%良性,13.1%GG1,41.3%GG>1。9.2%的 PI-RADS 4-5 病变为阴性,9%GG1,81.7%GG>1。考虑 PI-RADS 3 为阳性时,Se、Sp、NPV、PPV 和 AUC 分别为 82.9%、75%、87.6%、67.4%和 0.79。将 PI-RADS 3 考虑为阴性时,Se 为 64.8%,Sp 为 91%,NPV 为 80.6%,PPV 为 81.7%,AUC 为 0.78。

结论

MRI 和映射前列腺活检显示出中等程度的一致性。MRI 可能会遗漏五分之一的 csPCa 病灶,也可能会错误解读三分之一的 ROI。仔细解读 MRI 对优化患者治疗至关重要。

相似文献

1
Can we rely on magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection and surgical planning? Comprehensive analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing transperineal mapped biopsies.能否依靠磁共振成像进行前列腺癌检测和手术规划?经会阴靶向穿刺活检的大样本患者综合分析。
World J Urol. 2024 Sep 30;42(1):548. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05233-5.
2
Correction: Can we rely on magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection and surgical planning? Comprehensive analysis of a large cohort of patients undergoing transperineal mapped biopsies.更正:我们能否依靠磁共振成像进行前列腺癌检测和手术规划?对大量接受经会阴定位活检的患者进行的综合分析。
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 12;43(1):164. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05534-3.
3
Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy.对先前活检结果为阴性的患者,使用磁共振和超声图像融合引导经会阴前列腺活检进行靶向和系统活检的多中心评估。
BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):631-638. doi: 10.1111/bju.13711. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
PI-RADS 3 MRI lesions: Are biopsies still necessary?PI-RADS 3级磁共振成像病变:活检是否仍有必要?
Fr J Urol. 2025 Apr;35(3):102853. doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102853. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
5
[Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].[基于MRI的PI-RADS评分与靶向活检病理结果的关系分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Nov 23;45(11):942-947. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220805-00538.
6
Clinical value of contralateral biopsies in men with unilateral MRI foci undergoing targeted biopsy.对单侧MRI病灶的男性患者进行靶向活检时,对侧活检的临床价值。
BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):465-472. doi: 10.1111/bju.16579. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
7
Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with suspicion of prostate cancer.多中心评估磁共振成像引导经会阴前列腺穿刺活检在疑似前列腺癌的初次活检男性中的应用。
BJU Int. 2018 Jul;122(1):40-49. doi: 10.1111/bju.14049. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
8
A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.经会阴电磁跟踪磁共振成像/超声融合引导活检队列:评估读者间变异性对癌症检出率的影响。
BJU Int. 2020 Apr;125(4):531-540. doi: 10.1111/bju.14957. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
9
Initial experience of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion transperineal biopsy: Biopsy techniques and results for 75 patients.磁共振成像/超声融合经会阴前列腺穿刺活检的初步经验:75 例患者的活检技术和结果。
Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Nov;59(6):363-370. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.6.363. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
10
Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Serial Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.在前列腺癌主动监测的男性中,连续前列腺多参数磁共振成像的诊断准确性和预后价值。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Oct;5(5):537-543. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.11.007. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clinical, and Biopsy Findings in Suspected Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.磁共振成像、临床和活检在疑似前列腺癌中的表现:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e244258. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4258.
2
A Systematic Review of New Imaging Technologies for Robotic Prostatectomy: From Molecular Imaging to Augmented Reality.机器人前列腺切除术新成像技术的系统评价:从分子成像到增强现实
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 21;12(16):5425. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165425.
3
Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline Part II: Considerations for a Prostate Biopsy.
前列腺癌的早期检测:AUA/SUO 指南第二部分:前列腺活检的考虑因素。
J Urol. 2023 Jul;210(1):54-63. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003492. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
4
CURRENT ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE SCREENING, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER.磁共振成像在前列腺癌筛查、诊断和治疗中的作用。
Acta Clin Croat. 2022 Oct;61(Suppl 3):92-94. doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s3.14.
5
Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy: Comparing prostate cancer detection between targeted and systematic biopsy.弹性融合活检的准确性:比较靶向和系统活检对前列腺癌的检出率。
Prostate. 2023 Feb;83(2):162-168. doi: 10.1002/pros.24449. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
6
Considering Predictive Factors in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with PI-RADS 3 Lesions.考虑PI-RADS 3类病变患者临床显著性前列腺癌诊断中的预测因素。
Life (Basel). 2021 Dec 19;11(12):1432. doi: 10.3390/life11121432.
7
Future perspective of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌聚焦治疗的未来展望。
Asian J Urol. 2021 Oct;8(4):354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 May 3.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/MRI and multiparametric MRI in detecting index tumours in radical prostatectomy specimen.Ga-PSMA PET/MRI 与多参数 MRI 对前列腺根治性切除术后标本中指数肿瘤检测的诊断准确性。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Aug;75(8):e14287. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14287. Epub 2021 May 20.
9
Understanding the diagnosis of prostate cancer.了解前列腺癌的诊断。
Med J Aust. 2020 Nov;213(9):424-429. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50820. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
10
Predicting Pathological Tumor Size in Prostate Cancer Based on Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Preoperative Findings.基于多参数前列腺磁共振成像和术前发现预测前列腺癌的病理肿瘤大小。
J Urol. 2021 Feb;205(2):444-451. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001389. Epub 2020 Oct 7.