Slaoui Hakim, Neuzillet Yann, Ghoneim Tarek, Rouanne Mathieu, Abdou Abdelali, Lugagne-Delpon Pierre Marie, Scherrer Antoine, Radulescu Camelia, Delancourt Christian, Molinié Vincent, Lebret Thierry
Department of Urology, Hospital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Urol Int. 2017;99(2):156-161. doi: 10.1159/000468947. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
We aim to correlate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate reporting (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] version 2) with the Gleason score into both radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen and MRI fusion-targeted biopsies (FTB).
mpMRI of 74 patients who underwent an RP after FTB were retrospectively reviewed. The Gleason score distribution was compared according to the PI-RADS score using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results were compared to those of the mpMRI-guided biopsy of the same anatomical zone. For comparison, 903 RP specimen and their corresponding classical biopsies were also reviewed. Cohen's kappa concordance test was used to compare biopsies and prostatectomy specimen analyses.
An exact match between Gleason grade in RP specimen and FTB was found in 62% of the cases. There was no significant difference in Gleason score ≤7 (3 + 4) vs. ≥7 (4 + 3) distribution according to the PI-RADS scores (p = 0.096). Overall, Kappa coefficients were similar with MRI-targeted biopsies compared to classical biopsies (κ = 0.378, 95% CI [0.194-0.563], and κ = 0.316, 95% CI [0.259-0.374], respectively).
PI-RADS score was not associated with significant differences regarding Gleason score distribution within target. Moreover, concordance of Gleason score in both MRI-targeted and classical biopsies with those within target in RP specimen was weak.
我们旨在将前列腺多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)报告(前列腺影像报告和数据系统[PI-RADS]第2版)与根治性前列腺切除术(RP)标本及MRI融合靶向活检(FTB)中的Gleason评分相关联。
对74例在FTB后接受RP的患者的mpMRI进行回顾性分析。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验根据PI-RADS评分比较Gleason评分分布。将结果与相同解剖区域的mpMRI引导活检结果进行比较。为作比较,还对903例RP标本及其相应的传统活检进行了分析。采用Cohen's kappa一致性检验比较活检与前列腺切除标本分析结果。
62%的病例中RP标本和FTB的Gleason分级完全匹配。根据PI-RADS评分,Gleason评分≤7(3 + 4)与≥7(4 + 3)的分布无显著差异(p = 0.096)。总体而言,与传统活检相比,MRI靶向活检的Kappa系数相似(分别为κ = 0.378,95% CI [0.194 - 0.563]和κ = 0.316,95% CI [0.259 - 0.374])。
PI-RADS评分与靶区内Gleason评分分布的显著差异无关。此外,MRI靶向活检和传统活检中Gleason评分与RP标本靶区内评分的一致性较弱。