Suppr超能文献

抗凝治疗在肝硬化伴心房颤动患者中的风险与获益。

Risks Versus Benefits of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in Cirrhotic Patients.

机构信息

*Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea;†Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; and‡Heart Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;70(4):255-262. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000513.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To evaluate the clinical benefits and risks of anticoagulation with warfarin in cirrhotic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

A total of 465 cirrhotic patients diagnosed with nonvalvular AF were retrospectively analyzed. We compared incidences of ischemic stroke and major bleeding events between the 2 groups and examined the factors predicting ischemic stroke or major bleeding events.

RESULTS

Of 465 patients with AF, 113 (24.3%) received warfarin. Warfarin users had a lower mean Child-Pugh score (6.1 ± 1.5 vs. 7.6 ± 2.6) and a higher mean CHA2DS2VASc score (2.0 ± 2.5 vs. 1.7 ± 1.3) than nonusers (P's < 0.05). Overall, the incidence of ischemic stroke was low in cirrhotic patients with AF. It was not dependent on the CHA2DS2VASc score (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.05; P = 0.081), and was comparable in warfarin users (0.9%/person-year) and nonusers (1.2%/person-year). However, the incidence of major bleeding events was significantly higher in warfarin users (5.9% vs. 2.6%; P < 0.05). A multivariate analysis identified warfarin use (2.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-5.12) and Child-Pugh score (1.25; 1.04-1.49) as independently associated with bleeding events in these cirrhotic patients (P's < 0.05). There was no correlation between HAS-BLED score and risk of major bleeding (1.20; 0.95-1.52; P = 0.123).

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation with warfarin in cirrhotic patients with AF may not significantly reduce the risk of ischemic stroke, whereas it increases hemorrhagic complications.

摘要

背景与目的

评估抗凝治疗在合并心房颤动(房颤)的肝硬化患者中的临床获益和风险。

方法

共回顾性分析了 465 例诊断为非瓣膜性房颤的肝硬化患者。比较了两组缺血性卒中及大出血事件的发生率,并探讨了缺血性卒中或大出血事件的预测因素。

结果

465 例房颤患者中,113 例(24.3%)接受了华法林治疗。与未使用者相比,华法林使用者的平均 Child-Pugh 评分较低(6.1 ± 1.5 比 7.6 ± 2.6),CHA2DS2VASc 评分较高(2.0 ± 2.5 比 1.7 ± 1.3)(P 值均<0.05)。总体而言,合并房颤的肝硬化患者缺血性卒中发生率较低,且不依赖于 CHA2DS2VASc 评分(危险比 1.40;95%置信区间 0.96-2.05;P = 0.081),且在华法林使用者(0.9%/人年)和未使用者(1.2%/人年)中相当。然而,华法林使用者大出血事件发生率明显较高(5.9%比 2.6%)(P<0.05)。多变量分析显示,华法林使用(2.60;95%置信区间 1.32-5.12)和 Child-Pugh 评分(1.25;1.04-1.49)是这些肝硬化患者出血事件的独立相关因素(P 值均<0.05)。HAS-BLED 评分与大出血风险无相关性(1.20;0.95-1.52;P = 0.123)。

结论

在合并房颤的肝硬化患者中,抗凝治疗华法林可能不会显著降低缺血性卒中风险,反而会增加出血并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验