Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
RIKEN Quantitative Biology Centre, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Immunology. 2018 Apr;153(4):466-478. doi: 10.1111/imm.12849. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
T-cell receptors (TCRs) can productively interact with many different peptides bound within the MHC binding groove. This property varies with the level of cross-reactivity of TCRs; some TCRs are particularly hyper cross-reactive while others exhibit greater specificity. To elucidate the mechanism behind these differences, we studied five TCRs in complex with the same class II MHC (1A )-peptide (3K), that are known to exhibit different levels of cross-reactivity. Although these complexes have similar binding affinities, the interface areas between the TCR and the peptide-MHC (pMHC) differ significantly. We investigated static and dynamic structural features of the TCR-pMHC complexes and of TCRs in a free state, as well as the relationship between binding affinity and interface area. It was found that the TCRs known to exhibit lower levels of cross-reactivity bound to pMHC using an induced-fitting mechanism, forming large and tight interfaces rich in specific hydrogen bonds. In contrast, TCRs known to exhibit high levels of cross-reactivity used a more rigid binding mechanism where non-specific π-interactions involving the bulky Trp residue in CDR3β dominated. As entropy loss upon binding in these highly degenerate and rigid TCRs is smaller than that in less degenerate TCRs, they can better tolerate changes in residues distal from the major contacts with MHC-bound peptide. Hence, our dynamics study revealed that differences in the peptide recognition mechanisms by TCRs appear to correlate with the levels of T-cell cross-reactivity.
T 细胞受体 (TCRs) 可以与 MHC 结合槽内结合的许多不同肽段进行有效相互作用。这种特性随 TCR 的交叉反应性水平而变化;一些 TCR 特别具有高交叉反应性,而另一些则表现出更高的特异性。为了阐明这些差异的背后机制,我们研究了与相同 II 类 MHC(1A)-肽(3K)结合的五种 TCR,这些 TCR 已知具有不同的交叉反应性水平。尽管这些复合物具有相似的结合亲和力,但 TCR 与肽-MHC(pMHC)之间的界面区域却有很大的不同。我们研究了 TCR-pMHC 复合物的静态和动态结构特征,以及游离 TCR 的结构特征,以及结合亲和力与界面区域之间的关系。研究发现,已知具有较低交叉反应性的 TCR 与 pMHC 结合使用诱导拟合机制,形成大而紧密的界面,富含特异性氢键。相比之下,已知具有高交叉反应性的 TCR 使用更刚性的结合机制,其中涉及 CDR3β 中较大 Trp 残基的非特异性π-相互作用占主导地位。由于在这些高度简并和刚性的 TCR 中结合时的熵损失小于在非简并 TCR 中,它们可以更好地耐受与 MHC 结合肽的主要接触点以外的残基的变化。因此,我们的动力学研究表明,TCR 对肽的识别机制的差异似乎与 T 细胞交叉反应性水平相关。