Bianco S, Vaghi A, Robuschi M, Pasargiklian M
Institute of Lung Disease, University of Siena, Italy.
Lancet. 1988 Jul 30;2(8605):252-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92540-8.
To determine whether inhaled frusemide, a diuretic able to interfere with ion and water movement across airway epithelium, can modify exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, a three-part randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was done in asthmatic patients who had a fall in FEV1 of at least 20% after running up and down a corridor. In the first part the effect of approximately 28 mg frusemide given as an aerosol was compared with that of a placebo. In the second part two doses of inhaled frusemide (approximately 14 mg and 28 mg) were examined. In the third part the effect of 20 mg oral frusemide was tested. Inhaled frusemide had a good and dose-related protective effect, whereas oral frusemide was ineffective. The mean (95% CI) maximum percentage falls in the FEV1 were: 11.5 (14.3-8.7) with frusemide and 33.8 (39.1-28.5) with placebo in the first part of the study; 13.6 (21.6-6.0) with 28 mg frusemide, 19.7 (28.2-11.3) with 14 mg frusemide, and 34.6 (39.4-30.0) with placebo in the second part of the study; and 15.2 (19.9-10.5) with inhaled frusemide, 38.2 (47.1-29.3) with oral frusemide, and 35.3 (45.9-24.7) with placebo in the last part of the study. The findings lend support to the hyperosmolarity hypothesis of exercise-induced asthma and may have therapeutic implications.
为了确定吸入速尿(一种能够干扰离子和水通过气道上皮移动的利尿剂)是否可以改善运动诱发的支气管收缩,我们对在走廊上来回跑步后FEV1下降至少20%的哮喘患者进行了一项三部分的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。在第一部分中,将约28毫克速尿气雾剂的效果与安慰剂的效果进行了比较。在第二部分中,研究了两剂吸入速尿(约14毫克和28毫克)。在第三部分中,测试了20毫克口服速尿的效果。吸入速尿具有良好的剂量相关保护作用,而口服速尿无效。研究第一部分中,FEV1的平均(95%CI)最大下降百分比为:速尿组为11.5(14.3 - 8.7),安慰剂组为33.8(39.1 - 28.5);研究第二部分中,28毫克速尿组为13.6(21.6 - 6.0),14毫克速尿组为19.7(28.2 - 11.3),安慰剂组为34.6(39.4 - 30.0);研究最后一部分中,吸入速尿组为15.2(19.9 - 10.5),口服速尿组为38.2(47.1 - 29.3),安慰剂组为35.3(45.9 - 24.7)。这些发现支持了运动诱发哮喘的高渗假说,可能具有治疗意义。