Saha Krishna K, Wang Suojin
a Department of Mathematical Sciences , Central Connecticut State University , New Britain , CT , USA.
b Department of Statistics , Texas A&M University , College Station, Texas , USA.
J Biopharm Stat. 2018;28(4):682-697. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1377727. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
In cluster randomized trials, it is often of interest to estimate the common intraclass correlation at the design stage for sample size and power calculations, which are greatly affected by the value of a common intraclass correlation. In this article, we construct confidence intervals (CIs) for the common intraclass correlation coefficient of several treatment groups. We consider the profile likelihood (PL)-based approach using the beta-binomial models and the approach based on the concept of generalized pivots using the ANOVA estimator and its asymptotic variance. We compare both approaches with a number of large sample procedures as well as both parametric and nonparametric bootstrap procedures in terms of coverage and expected CI length through a simulation study, and illustrate the methodology with two examples from biomedical fields. The results support the use of the PL-based CI as it holds the preassigned confidence level very well and overall gives a very competitive length.
在整群随机试验中,在设计阶段估计共同组内相关系数以进行样本量和检验效能计算通常很有意义,而样本量和检验效能计算会受到共同组内相关系数值的极大影响。在本文中,我们构建了几个治疗组共同组内相关系数的置信区间(CI)。我们考虑使用β-二项式模型的基于轮廓似然(PL)的方法,以及使用方差分析估计量及其渐近方差基于广义枢轴概念的方法。通过模拟研究,我们从覆盖范围和预期CI长度方面将这两种方法与一些大样本程序以及参数和非参数自助程序进行了比较,并用生物医学领域的两个例子说明了该方法。结果支持使用基于PL的CI,因为它能很好地保持预先设定的置信水平,并且总体上给出了非常有竞争力的区间长度。