Provorse Long Makenzie R, Isborn Christine M
Department of Chemistry, University of Central Arkansas , Conway, Arkansas 72035, United States.
Chemistry and Chemical Biology, University of California Merced , Merced, California 95343, United States.
J Phys Chem B. 2017 Nov 2;121(43):10105-10117. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b06693. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
A promising approach for accurately modeling both short-range and long-range solvation effects is to combine explicit quantum mechanical (QM) solvent with a classical polarizable continuum model (PCM), but the best PCM for these combined QM/classical calculations is relatively unexplored. We find that the choice of the solvation cavity is very important for obtaining physically correct results since unphysical double counting of solvation effects from both the QM solvent and the classical dielectric can occur with a poor choice of cavity. We investigate the dependence of electronic excitation energies on the definition of the PCM cavity and the self-consistent reaction field method, comparing results to large-scale explicit QM solvent calculations. For excitation energies, we identify the difference between the ground and excited state dipole moments as the key property determining the sensitivity to the PCM cavity. Using a linear response PCM approach combined with QM solvent, we show that excitation energies are best modeled by a solvent excluded surface or a scaled van der Waals surface. For the aqueous solutes studied here, we find that a scaled van der Waals surface defined by universal force field radii scaled by a factor of 1.5 gives reasonable excitation energies. When using an external iteration state-specific PCM approach, however, the excitation energies are most accurate with a larger PCM cavity, such as a solvent accessible surface.
一种用于精确模拟短程和长程溶剂化效应的有前景的方法是将显式量子力学(QM)溶剂与经典极化连续介质模型(PCM)相结合,但对于这些组合的QM/经典计算而言,最佳的PCM相对未被充分探索。我们发现,溶剂化腔的选择对于获得物理上正确的结果非常重要,因为如果腔的选择不当,可能会出现QM溶剂和经典电介质对溶剂化效应的非物理双重计数。我们研究了电子激发能对PCM腔定义和自洽反应场方法的依赖性,并将结果与大规模显式QM溶剂计算进行比较。对于激发能,我们确定基态和激发态偶极矩之间的差异是决定对PCM腔敏感性的关键性质。使用结合QM溶剂的线性响应PCM方法,我们表明激发能最好由溶剂排除表面或缩放的范德华表面来模拟。对于此处研究的水性溶质,我们发现由通用力场半径按1.5倍缩放定义的缩放范德华表面给出了合理的激发能。然而,当使用外部迭代态特异性PCM方法时,激发能在较大的PCM腔(如溶剂可及表面)下最为准确。