Benhidjeb Tahar, Benhidjeb Isabel, Stark Michael, Kreisel Stefan, Krüger Martin, Pfitzenmaier Jesco, Schulte Am Esch Jan
Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Center for General, Vascular, Thoracic and Visceral Surgery, Protestant Hospital of Bethel Foundation, University Hospital OWL, Campus Bielefeld Bethel, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
The New European Surgical Academy (NESA), Berlin, Germany.
Int J Womens Health. 2022 Dec 29;14:1881-1895. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S382457. eCollection 2022.
Despite that NOTES produces at least matchable clinical long-term results when compared to laparoscopy, still a restraint within the medical community and among patients is evident. Consequently, it might be meaningful to evaluate factors of patient's NOTES perception to promote its acceptance. NOTES is still quite novel and questionnaires regarding its perception by the public is still lacking even so in the Middle East. Aim of our survey is to investigate the viewpoint of female healthcare staff on NOTES.
A total of 350 questionnaires along with written information about Minimally Invasive Surgery and NOTES were distributed among the female staff in a Tertiary-care Hospital in Abu Dhabi, 257 were returned completely anonymously and voluntarily and entered into a database with a response rate of 73%. We surveyed factors like religion, medical background, age as well as history of previous laparoscopy, endoscopy, birth and other aspects that may impact a woman's perception of both transgastric and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy and ovariectomy, respectively.
Univariate analyses revealed the majority of Muslim women to be more receptive to NOTES as a choice of surgical technique for cholecystectomy and for ovariectomy, respectively, when compared to Christians and Hindus. However, when compared to Muslims, Christian and Hindu groups had a larger share of medical professions. Women with a medical background would opt significantly less for NOTES. Among younger women, NOTES cholecystectomy was refused due to anxiety concerning future pregnancies and sexual dysfunction. Multinomial logistic regression analysis determined medical background and with independent predictive value for the overall choice of interventional technique (p<0.001). Marital status played a significant role only in the comparison of laparoscopy vs transgastric NOTES when performing cholecystectomy and ovariectomy (p<0.01).
In this first study emanating from the Middle East, medical education and partly life stage rather than cross-cultural differences seem to influence NOTES perception in women.
尽管经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)与腹腔镜手术相比能产生至少相当的临床长期效果,但医学界和患者中仍明显存在限制因素。因此,评估患者对NOTES的认知因素以促进其被接受可能具有重要意义。NOTES仍然相当新颖,即使在中东地区,关于公众对其认知的调查问卷也仍然缺乏。我们调查的目的是研究女性医护人员对NOTES的看法。
在阿布扎比一家三级护理医院,向女性工作人员发放了总共350份问卷以及关于微创手术和NOTES的书面信息,257份问卷被完全匿名且自愿返还,并录入数据库,回复率为73%。我们调查了宗教、医学背景、年龄以及既往腹腔镜手术、内镜检查、生育史等可能影响女性对分别用于胆囊切除术和卵巢切除术的经胃NOTES和经阴道NOTES认知的其他方面。
单因素分析显示,与基督教徒和印度教徒相比,大多数穆斯林女性分别更愿意接受NOTES作为胆囊切除术和卵巢切除术的手术技术选择。然而,与穆斯林相比,基督教徒和印度教群体中从事医学职业的比例更高。有医学背景的女性选择NOTES的可能性明显更低。在年轻女性中,由于对未来怀孕和性功能障碍的担忧,NOTES胆囊切除术被拒绝。多项逻辑回归分析确定医学背景对介入技术的总体选择具有独立预测价值(p<0.001)。婚姻状况仅在胆囊切除术和卵巢切除术时腹腔镜手术与经胃NOTES的比较中起显著作用(p<0.01)。
在这项来自中东的首次研究中,医学教育以及部分生活阶段而非跨文化差异似乎影响女性对NOTES的认知。