Cubeddu L X
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27514.
Am Heart J. 1988 Jul;116(1 Pt 1):133-62. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90261-x.
The pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety of new alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonists for the treatment of hypertension was reviewed (Table XIV). Although all these agents block alpha 1 receptors, some of them have additional effects on histamine, serotonin, dopamine, and alpha 2 receptors. These other actions account for the differences in the side effect profiles observed, i.e., increased incidence of central nervous system side effects found with indoramin, ketanserin, and urapidil, as well as for some additional beneficial effects of ketanserin (i.e., antiplatelet aggregation activity). The magnitude of BP reduction observed with antagonists of alpha 1-adrenergic receptors is modest. In most studies, the degree of BP reduction is comparable to that of prazosin, but less than that achieved with thiazide diuretics, beta-receptor antagonists, or methyldopa. Studies on the comparative efficacy and safety of new alpha 1 antagonists with converting enzyme inhibitors or calcium-channel blockers are not available. In general, alpha 1 antagonists produce greater reductions in standing than in supine BP, an effect due to the venodilatory action of these drugs. New alpha 1 antagonists appear to have equal efficacy in black and white hypertensive individuals. Their comparative efficacy and safety in young vs elderly hypertensive individuals requires further investigation. No information about the possible development of tolerance during treatment with new alpha 1 blockers was encountered. The effects of alpha 1 antagonists on HR are variable and depend on how long after the oral dose the measurements were obtained. In most studies, no significant HR changes are noticed for readings obtained 24 hours post dose; whereas tachycardia has been observed at the time of peak hypotension. Since alpha 1 antagonist-induced tachycardia is most likely of reflex nature, i.e., mediated to an increase in sympathetic activity, the increased HR may be associated with increases in myocardial contractility and in myocardial oxygen consumption. Consequently, a 24-hour HR monitoring during treatment with alpha 1 antagonists should be required for evaluation of new agents. The hemodynamic, humoral, and hormonal effects of the newer alpha 1-receptor antagonists are comparable to those of prazosin. The most consistent finding is a reduction in total peripheral resistance associated with either no change or with only small increases in cardiac index. These agents have been shown either not to change or to increase renal blood flow.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
本文综述了用于治疗高血压的新型α-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂的药理学、临床疗效及安全性(表十四)。尽管所有这些药物均能阻断α1受体,但其中一些药物对组胺、5-羟色胺、多巴胺及α2受体还有其他作用。这些其他作用导致了所观察到的副作用谱的差异,即吲哚拉明、酮色林及乌拉地尔引起的中枢神经系统副作用发生率增加,以及酮色林的一些额外有益作用(即抗血小板聚集活性)。α1-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂所观察到的血压降低幅度较小。在大多数研究中,血压降低程度与哌唑嗪相当,但低于噻嗪类利尿剂、β受体拮抗剂或甲基多巴。尚无关于新型α1拮抗剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或钙通道阻滞剂的比较疗效及安全性的研究。一般来说,α1拮抗剂引起的站立位血压降低幅度大于仰卧位,这是由于这些药物的静脉舒张作用所致。新型α1拮抗剂在黑人和白人高血压患者中似乎具有相同的疗效。它们在年轻与老年高血压患者中的比较疗效及安全性有待进一步研究。未发现关于新型α1阻滞剂治疗期间可能产生耐受性的信息。α1拮抗剂对心率的影响各不相同,这取决于口服给药后测量的时间。在大多数研究中,给药24小时后的读数未发现心率有明显变化;而在血压降至最低时观察到心动过速。由于α1拮抗剂引起的心动过速很可能是反射性的,即由交感神经活动增加介导,心率增加可能与心肌收缩力及心肌耗氧量增加有关。因此,在用α1拮抗剂治疗期间,应进行24小时心率监测以评估新药。新型α1受体拮抗剂的血液动力学、体液及激素作用与哌唑嗪相当。最一致的发现是总外周阻力降低,同时心指数无变化或仅有小幅增加。这些药物已被证明要么不改变肾血流量,要么增加肾血流量。(摘要截选至400字)