Clinical Research Institute, Medford, OR, USA.
Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
Lung. 2017 Dec;195(6):739-747. doi: 10.1007/s00408-017-0055-9. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
To compare the efficacy and safety of two long-acting dual bronchodilator combinations: indacaterol/glycopyrrolate (IND/GLY) versus umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI).
Studies A2349 and A2350 were replicate, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, cross-over studies in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Patients were randomized to sequential 12-week treatments of twice-daily IND/GLY 27.5/15.6 μg and once-daily UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg, each separated by a 3-week washout. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of IND/GLY compared with UMEC/VI in terms of the 24-h forced expiratory volume in 1 s profile at week 12 (FEV AUC). Rescue medication use, symptom control, and safety were assessed throughout.
Both treatments delivered substantial bronchodilation over 12 weeks, with improvements in FEV AUC at week 12 of 232 and 185 mL for IND/GLY, and 244 and 203 mL with UMEC/VI in Studies A2349 and A2350, respectively. The primary efficacy objective of non-inferiority of IND/GLY relative to UMEC/VI was not met as the lower bound of the confidence interval for the LS treatment comparison was below the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -20 mL in both studies: -26.9 and -34.2 mL, respectively (LS mean between-treatment differences: -11.5 and -18.2 mL). Both drugs were well tolerated, with AE profiles consistent with their respective prescribing information.
IND/GLY and UMEC/VI provided clinically meaningful and comparable bronchodilation. Non-inferiority of IND/GLY to UMEC/VI could not be declared although between-treatment differences were not clinically relevant. The data support the use of IND/GLY as an efficacious and well tolerated treatment option in patients with COPD. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02487446 and NCT02487498).
比较两种长效双重支气管扩张剂组合的疗效和安全性:茚达特罗/格隆溴铵(IND/GLY)与乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(UMEC/VI)。
研究 A2349 和 A2350 是两项在中度至重度 COPD 患者中进行的、复制的、随机的、双盲的、双模拟的、活性对照的交叉研究。患者被随机分配接受为期 12 周的每日两次 IND/GLY 27.5/15.6μg和每日一次 UMEC/VI 62.5/25μg序贯治疗,每种治疗之间用 3 周洗脱期隔开。主要目的是证明在第 12 周时,IND/GLY 在 24 小时用力呼气量 1 秒率(FEV AUC)方面与 UMEC/VI 相比非劣效。整个研究过程中评估了救急药物的使用、症状控制和安全性。
两种治疗方案均在 12 周内实现了显著的支气管扩张,在第 12 周时,FEV AUC 分别改善了 232 和 185mL,IND/GLY 和 244 和 203mL,UMEC/VI 在研究 A2349 和 A2350 中分别如此。IND/GLY 相对于 UMEC/VI 的非劣效性主要疗效目标未达到,因为两项研究中 LS 治疗比较的置信区间下限均低于 -20mL 的预设非劣效性边界:分别为-26.9 和-34.2mL(LS 治疗间差异均值:-11.5 和-18.2mL)。两种药物均具有良好的耐受性,AE 谱与各自的处方信息一致。
IND/GLY 和 UMEC/VI 提供了具有临床意义的、可比较的支气管扩张。尽管治疗间差异无临床意义,但不能宣布 IND/GLY 相对于 UMEC/VI 的非劣效性。这些数据支持将 IND/GLY 作为一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择用于 COPD 患者。(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02487446 和 NCT02487498)。