• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对全新的移植自我:器官移植受者如何应对认知风险

Navigating the new, transplanted self: how recipients manage the cognitive risks of organ transplantation.

作者信息

Cormier Nicholas R, Gallo-Cruz Selina R, Beard Renee L

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Anthropology, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, USA.

出版信息

Sociol Health Illn. 2017 Nov;39(8):1496-1513. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12610. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1111/1467-9566.12610
PMID:28994121
Abstract

The physiological risks of organ transplantation are well documented, but more poorly understood are the sociological ways in which organ recipients redefine themselves in reaction to physiological risks and social changes accompanying transplantation. This article analyses transplantation as a procedure that is not only physiologically risky but also poses risk to the social identity of the recipient, and explores how transplant recipients cognitively navigate transplantation surgery from waiting for to recovering after a transplant. It builds on previous sociological exploration of risk as a socially constructed process mediating experiences of health and illness with a focused contribution on explaining how individuals navigate risks posed to their social identities by major biophysical transformations. This article pointedly analyses narratives of fourteen organ recipients and the four dominant phases of identity management that emerged to create what we have coined as the new 'transplanted self', indicating the varied ways the individual social self emerges in response to the social risks of transplantation. We conclude that a better understanding of the recipient experience will contribute to improved care in the transplantation field.

摘要

器官移植的生理风险已有充分记录,但人们对器官接受者在面对生理风险以及移植带来的社会变化时重新定义自我的社会学方式了解较少。本文将移植分析为一种不仅存在生理风险,而且对接受者的社会身份构成风险的过程,并探讨移植接受者如何从等待移植到移植后康复的过程中,在认知上应对移植手术。它建立在以往将风险视为一个社会建构过程的社会学探索基础之上,该过程调解着健康与疾病的体验,并重点解释了个体如何应对重大生物物理转变对其社会身份构成的风险。本文尖锐地分析了14位器官接受者的叙述以及身份管理出现的四个主要阶段,这些阶段共同塑造了我们所称的新“移植自我”,表明个体社会自我因应移植的社会风险而出现的多样方式。我们得出结论,更好地理解接受者的经历将有助于改善移植领域的护理。

相似文献

1
Navigating the new, transplanted self: how recipients manage the cognitive risks of organ transplantation.应对全新的移植自我:器官移植受者如何应对认知风险
Sociol Health Illn. 2017 Nov;39(8):1496-1513. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12610. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
2
Risk acceptance in laryngeal transplantation.喉移植中的风险接受度。
Laryngoscope. 2006 Oct;116(10):1770-5. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000231309.85984.69.
3
Adolescent experiences following organ transplantation: a systematic review of qualitative studies.器官移植后的青少年经历:定性研究的系统综述
J Pediatr. 2009 Oct;155(4):542-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
4
Organ transplantation and personal identity: how does loss and change of organs affect the self?器官移植与个人身份:器官的丧失与改变如何影响自我?
J Med Philos. 2012 Apr;37(2):139-58. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhs011. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
5
The core of social function after solid organ transplantation.实体器官移植后社会功能的核心。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2016 Sep;30(3):458-65. doi: 10.1111/scs.12264. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
6
Explaining the quality of life of organ transplant patients by using crisis theory.运用危机理论解释器官移植患者的生活质量。
Prog Transplant. 2015 Dec;25(4):324-31. doi: 10.7182/pit2015904.
7
The adolescent transplant recipient.青少年器官移植受者。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;57(2):575-92, table of contents. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2010.01.013.
8
Report from the National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (NTPR): outcomes of pregnancy after transplantation.国家移植妊娠登记处(NTPR)报告:移植后妊娠的结局
Clin Transpl. 2000:123-34.
9
Psychosocial Challenges in Solid Organ Transplantation.实体器官移植中的社会心理挑战
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2015 Sep;22(2-3):122-35. doi: 10.1007/s10880-015-9435-6.
10
[Comparative study of needs of transplanted patients or those waiting for an organ transplantation and the nurses' attitudes of these needs].移植患者或等待器官移植者的需求与护士对这些需求的态度的比较研究
Rech Soins Infirm. 2000 Dec(63):26-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Aspects of Self-Management After Solid Organ Transplantation-A Scoping Review.实体器官移植后的自我管理方面——一项范围综述
Nurs Rep. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):304. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15080304.
2
Finding Their Place: How Anesthesiology Interns Develop a Sense of Belongingness in a New Community of Practice.找到自己的位置:麻醉学实习生如何在新的实践社区中培养归属感。
J Educ Perioper Med. 2025 Jun 6;27(2):E744. doi: 10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue2_Cormier. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
3
Feasibility study and determination of prerequisites of telecare programme to enhance patient management in lung transplantation: a qualitative study from the perspective of Iranian healthcare providers.
远程医疗计划增强肺移植患者管理的可行性研究和前提条件的确定:来自伊朗医疗保健提供者的角度的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 22;13(6):e073370. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073370.
4
Perspectives of Kidney Transplant Recipients, Transplant Candidates, and Living Kidney Donors on the Role of Patients' Self-Narratives and Experiences of Creative Writing Workshops: A Qualitative Study.肾移植受者、移植候选者及活体肾捐献者对患者自我叙述及创意写作工作坊体验作用的看法:一项定性研究
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2022 Nov 4;9:20543581221132742. doi: 10.1177/20543581221132742. eCollection 2022.
5
Peer Mentoring as an Avenue to Explore in Kidney Transplantation: Kidney Transplant Recipients' Perspectives on Peer Mentoring.同伴指导作为肾脏移植领域有待探索的途径:肾脏移植受者对同伴指导的看法
Transplant Direct. 2021 Feb 18;7(3):e672. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001130. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Organ Transplant Recipients' Experiences of Physical Activity: Health, Self-Care, and Transliminality.器官移植受者的身体活动体验:健康、自我护理与阈限转换
Qual Health Res. 2021 Jan;31(2):385-398. doi: 10.1177/1049732320967915. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
7
'You have got a foreign body in there': renal transplantation, unexpected mild-to-moderate distress and patients' support needs: a qualitative study.“你体内有异物”:肾移植、意外的轻度至中度痛苦和患者的支持需求:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 31;10(3):e035627. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035627.