Departments of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Pediatric Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Europace. 2018 Jun 1;20(6):1043-1049. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux126.
In patients with Fontan circulation, the conduit may be punctured for electrophysiological procedures. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of a stepwise approach to conduit puncture in adults who have undergone Fontan operation.
We included 13 consecutive patients with lateral tunnel or extracardiac conduit Fontan circulation [median age (interquartile range), 24.0 (16.0-25.0) years; seven men] who had undergone electrophysiological procedures. We performed a stepwise approach to conduit puncture: 1st, Brockenbrough needle; 2nd, Brockenbrough needle with snare; 3rd, extra-steep Brockenbrough needle with/without snare; 4th radiofrequency transseptal needle with/without snare; 5th, wiring through the puncture; 6th, conduit dilation with angioplasty balloon; 7th, non-compliant or cutting balloon; and 8th, Inoue dilator. In 12 patients, conduit puncture was successful. In two, one, and two patients with a lateral tunnel made of the pericardium or right atrial wall, conduit puncture was performed by steps 1st, 2nd, and 4th, respectively. In one, three, two, and one patient with the Goretex lateral tunnel or extracardiac conduit, conduit puncture was performed by steps 1st, 6th, 7th, and 8th, respectively. Puncture time was significantly longer in patients with Goretex conduits than with pericardial conduits [62.0 (50.0-120.0) and 11.5 (10.0-14.8) min, respectively; P < 0.001]. A snare was necessary in patients with angles ≤ 35° between the conduit wall and vertical line.
A stepwise conduit puncture approach is feasible and safe in patients with lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit Fontan circulation. Goretex conduit puncture was more difficult than pericardial conduit puncture.
在 Fontan 循环患者中,可能需要对管道进行电生理程序穿刺。我们评估了对已接受 Fontan 手术的成人进行逐步管道穿刺的可行性和安全性。
我们纳入了 13 例连续接受外侧隧道或心外管道 Fontan 循环的患者[中位年龄(四分位距),24.0(16.0-25.0)岁;7 名男性],这些患者接受了电生理程序。我们对管道进行了逐步穿刺:1 步,使用 Brockenbrough 针;2 步,使用 Brockenbrough 针和圈套器;3 步,使用超倾斜 Brockenbrough 针和/或圈套器;4 步,使用射频经间隔穿刺针和/或圈套器;5 步,通过穿刺布线;6 步,使用球囊血管成形术扩张管道;7 步,使用非顺应性或切割球囊;8 步,使用 Inoue 扩张器。在 12 例患者中,成功进行了管道穿刺。在 2 例使用心包或右心房壁制成的外侧隧道的患者中,分别通过第 1、2 和 4 步进行了管道穿刺;在 1 例使用 Goretex 外侧隧道或心外管道的患者中,分别通过第 1、6、7 和 8 步进行了管道穿刺;在 3 例使用 Goretex 外侧隧道或心外管道的患者中,分别通过第 1、6、7 和 8 步进行了管道穿刺。使用 Goretex 管道的患者穿刺时间明显长于使用心包管道的患者[62.0(50.0-120.0)和 11.5(10.0-14.8)min;P<0.001]。在管道壁与垂直线之间角度≤35°的患者中需要使用圈套器。
在具有外侧隧道和心外管道 Fontan 循环的患者中,逐步管道穿刺方法是可行且安全的。与心包管道穿刺相比,Goretex 管道穿刺更困难。