Adler-Milstein Julia, Holmgren A Jay, Kralovec Peter, Worzala Chantal, Searcy Talisha, Patel Vaishali
Schools of Information and Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Health Forum, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1142-1148. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx080.
While most hospitals have adopted electronic health records (EHRs), we know little about whether hospitals use EHRs in advanced ways that are critical to improving outcomes, and whether hospitals with fewer resources - small, rural, safety-net - are keeping up.
Using 2008-2015 American Hospital Association Information Technology Supplement survey data, we measured "basic" and "comprehensive" EHR adoption among hospitals to provide the latest national numbers. We then used new supplement questions to assess advanced use of EHRs and EHR data for performance measurement and patient engagement functions. To assess a digital "advanced use" divide, we ran logistic regression models to identify hospital characteristics associated with high adoption in each advanced use domain.
We found that 80.5% of hospitals adopted at least a basic EHR system, a 5.3 percentage point increase from 2014. Only 37.5% of hospitals adopted at least 8 (of 10) EHR data for performance measurement functions, and 41.7% of hospitals adopted at least 8 (of 10) patient engagement functions. Critical access hospitals were less likely to have adopted at least 8 performance measurement functions (odds ratio [OR] = 0.58; P < .001) and at least 8 patient engagement functions (OR = 0.68; P = 0.02).
While the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act resulted in widespread hospital EHR adoption, use of advanced EHR functions lags and a digital divide appears to be emerging, with critical-access hospitals in particular lagging behind. This is concerning, because EHR-enabled performance measurement and patient engagement are key contributors to improving hospital performance.
Hospital EHR adoption is widespread and many hospitals are using EHRs to support performance measurement and patient engagement. However, this is not happening across all hospitals.
虽然大多数医院已采用电子健康记录(EHR),但我们对医院是否以对改善医疗结果至关重要的先进方式使用EHR,以及资源较少的医院(小型、农村、安全网医院)是否能跟上这一情况知之甚少。
利用2008 - 2015年美国医院协会信息技术补充调查数据,我们衡量了医院中“基本”和“全面”EHR的采用情况,以提供最新的全国数据。然后,我们使用新的补充问题来评估EHR的先进用途以及用于绩效评估和患者参与功能的EHR数据。为了评估数字“先进用途”差距,我们运行逻辑回归模型来确定与每个先进用途领域高采用率相关的医院特征。
我们发现80.5%的医院至少采用了基本的EHR系统,比2014年增加了5.3个百分点。只有37.5%的医院采用了至少8项(共10项)用于绩效评估功能的EHR数据,41.7%的医院采用了至少8项(共10项)患者参与功能。关键接入医院采用至少8项绩效评估功能的可能性较小(优势比[OR]=0.58;P<0.001),采用至少8项患者参与功能的可能性也较小(OR = 0.68;P = 0.02)。
虽然《经济和临床健康的健康信息技术法案》导致医院广泛采用EHR,但先进EHR功能的使用滞后,数字鸿沟似乎正在出现,尤其是关键接入医院落后明显。这令人担忧,因为基于EHR的绩效评估和患者参与是改善医院绩效的关键因素。
医院EHR的采用很普遍,许多医院正在使用EHR来支持绩效评估和患者参与。然而,并非所有医院都是如此。