Bolders Anna C, Tops Mattie, Band Guido P H, Stallen Pieter Jan M
Cognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden UniversityLeiden, Netherlands.
Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden UniversityLeiden, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 22;8:1642. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01642. eCollection 2017.
To shed new light on the long-standing debate about the (in)dependence of sensitivity to weak stimuli and overreactivity to strong stimuli, we examined the relation between these tendencies within the neurobehavioral framework of the Predictive and Reactive Control Systems (PARCS) theory (Tops et al., 2010, 2014). Whereas previous studies only considered overreactivity in terms of the individual tendency to experience unpleasant affect (punishment reactivity) resulting from strong sensory stimulation, we also took the individual tendency to experience pleasant affect (reward reactivity) resulting from strong sensory stimulation into account. According to PARCS theory, these temperamental tendencies overlap in terms of high reactivity toward stimulation, but oppose each other in terms of the response orientation (approach or avoid). PARCS theory predicts that both types of reactivity to strong stimuli relate to sensitivity to weak stimuli, but that these relationships are suppressed due to the opposing relationship between reward and punishment reactivity. We measured punishment and reward reactivity to strong stimuli and sensitivity to weak stimuli using scales from the Adult Temperament Questionnaire (Evans and Rothbart, 2007). Sensitivity was also measured more objectively using the masked auditory threshold. We found that sensitivity to weak stimuli (both self-reported and objectively assessed) was positively associated with self-reported punishment and reward reactivity to strong stimuli, but only when these reactivity measures were controlled for each other, implicating a mutual suppression effect. These results are in line with PARCS theory and suggest that sensitivity to weak stimuli and overreactivity are dependent, but this dependency is likely to be obscured if punishment and reward reactivity are not both taken into account.
为了给关于对弱刺激的敏感性与对强刺激的过度反应性(非)独立性的长期争论带来新的启示,我们在预测与反应控制系统(PARCS)理论(Tops等人,2010年,2014年)的神经行为框架内研究了这些倾向之间的关系。以往的研究仅从个体因强烈感觉刺激而体验到不愉快情绪(惩罚反应性)的倾向方面考虑过度反应性,而我们还考虑了个体因强烈感觉刺激而体验到愉快情绪(奖励反应性)的倾向。根据PARCS理论,这些气质倾向在对刺激的高反应性方面重叠,但在反应取向(趋近或回避)方面相互对立。PARCS理论预测,对强刺激的这两种反应性类型都与对弱刺激的敏感性相关,但由于奖励和惩罚反应性之间的对立关系,这些关系受到了抑制。我们使用成人气质问卷(Evans和Rothbart,2007年)中的量表测量了对强刺激的惩罚和奖励反应性以及对弱刺激的敏感性。还使用掩蔽听觉阈值更客观地测量了敏感性。我们发现,对弱刺激的敏感性(自我报告和客观评估)与对强刺激的自我报告的惩罚和奖励反应性呈正相关,但只有当这些反应性测量相互控制时才成立,这意味着存在相互抑制效应。这些结果与PARCS理论一致,表明对弱刺激的敏感性和过度反应性是相关的,但如果不将惩罚和奖励反应性都考虑在内,这种相关性可能会被掩盖。