Suppr超能文献

豆科灌木比非豆科灌木更具氮素稳态。

Legume Shrubs Are More Nitrogen-Homeostatic than Non-legume Shrubs.

作者信息

Guo Yanpei, Yang Xian, Schöb Christian, Jiang Youxu, Tang Zhiyao

机构信息

Department of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2017 Sep 26;8:1662. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01662. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Legumes are characterized as keeping stable nutrient supply under nutrient-limited conditions. However, few studies examined the legumes' stoichiometric advantages over other plants across various taxa in natural ecosystems. We explored differences in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) stoichiometry of different tissue types (leaf, stem, and root) between N-fixing legume shrubs and non-N-fixing shrubs from 299 broadleaved deciduous shrubland sites in northern China. After excluding effects of taxonomy and environmental variables, these two functional groups differed considerably in nutrient regulation. N concentrations and N:P ratios were higher in legume shrubs than in non-N-fixing shrubs. N concentrations were positively correlated between the plants and soil for non-N-fixing shrubs, but not for legume shrubs, indicating a stronger stoichiometric homeostasis in legume shrubs than in non-N-fixing shrubs. N concentrations were positively correlated among three tissue types for non-N-fixing shrubs, but not between leaves and non-leaf tissues for legume shrubs, demonstrating that N concentrations were more dependent among tissues for non-N-fixing shrubs than for legume shrubs. N and P concentrations were correlated within all tissues for both functional groups, but the regression slopes were flatter for legume shrubs than non-N-fixing shrubs, implying that legume shrubs were more P limited than non-N-fixing shrubs. These results address significant differences in stoichiometry between legume shrubs and non-N-fixing shrubs, and indicate the influence of symbiotic nitrogen fixation (SNF) on plant stoichiometry. Overall, N-fixing legume shrubs are higher and more stoichiometrically homeostatic in N concentrations. However, due to excess uptake of N, legumes may suffer from potential P limitation. With their N advantage, legume shrubs could be good nurse plants in restoration sites with degraded soil, but their P supply should be taken care of during management according to our results.

摘要

豆科植物的特点是在养分有限的条件下能保持稳定的养分供应。然而,很少有研究在自然生态系统中考察豆科植物相对于其他不同分类群植物的化学计量优势。我们探究了中国北方299个阔叶落叶灌丛样地中固氮豆科灌木和非固氮灌木不同组织类型(叶、茎和根)的氮(N)和磷(P)化学计量差异。排除分类学和环境变量的影响后,这两个功能组在养分调节方面存在显著差异。豆科灌木的N浓度和N:P比高于非固氮灌木。非固氮灌木的植物与土壤之间N浓度呈正相关,而豆科灌木则不然,这表明豆科灌木比非固氮灌木具有更强的化学计量稳态。非固氮灌木的三种组织类型之间N浓度呈正相关,而豆科灌木的叶与非叶组织之间则不然,这表明非固氮灌木的组织间N浓度依赖性比豆科灌木更强。两个功能组的所有组织内N和P浓度均相关,但豆科灌木的回归斜率比非固氮灌木更平缓,这意味着豆科灌木比非固氮灌木更受P限制。这些结果揭示了豆科灌木和非固氮灌木在化学计量上的显著差异,并表明共生固氮(SNF)对植物化学计量的影响。总体而言,固氮豆科灌木的N浓度更高且化学计量更稳定。然而,由于N的过量吸收,豆科植物可能会受到潜在的P限制。凭借其N优势,豆科灌木在土壤退化的恢复地可能是良好的保育植物,但根据我们的研究结果,在管理过程中应注意其P供应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4998/5622988/fe16803a6f34/fpls-08-01662-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验