• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估头孢曲松和苄星青霉素 G 治疗中国江苏早期梅毒的多中心研究。

A Multicenter Study Evaluating Ceftriaxone and Benzathine Penicillin G as Treatment Agents for Early Syphilis in Jiangsu, China.

机构信息

Institute of Dermatology and Skin Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Nanjing.

Department of Dermatology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 30;65(10):1683-1688. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix611.

DOI:10.1093/cid/cix611
PMID:29020150
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of ceftriaxone and benzathine penicillin G (BPG) in nonpregnant, immunocompetent adults with early syphilis because there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting ceftriaxone as an alternative treatment for early syphilis without an human immunodeficiency virus coinfection.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label controlled study evaluating the efficacy of ceftriaxone and BPG was conducted in 4 hospitals in Jiangsu Province. Treatment comprised either ceftriaxone (1.0 g, given intravenously, once daily for 10 days) or BPG (2.4 million units, given intramuscularly, once weekly for 2 weeks). A serological response was defined as a ≥4-fold decline in the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer.

RESULTS

In all, 301 patients with early syphilis were enrolled in this study; 230 subjects completed the follow-ups. The serological response at 6 months of follow up was observed in 90.2% in ceftriaxone group and 78.0% in BPG group (P = .01). There was no significant difference between treatment groups in patients with primary or early latent syphilis, but among patients with secondary syphilis the difference was highly significant (95.8% vs 76.2%; P < .01). Moreover, patients exhibiting a Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction after treatment might have a shorter period before a serological response (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, ceftriaxone regimen was noninferior to the BPG regimen in nonpregnant, immunocompetent patients with early syphilis.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ChiCTR-TQR-13003624.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估头孢曲松和苄星青霉素 G(BPG)在非妊娠、免疫功能正常的早期梅毒患者中的疗效,因为缺乏临床证据支持头孢曲松可作为无人类免疫缺陷病毒合并感染的早期梅毒替代治疗方法。

方法

在江苏省的 4 家医院进行了一项随机、开放标签对照研究,评估头孢曲松和 BPG 的疗效。治疗方案包括头孢曲松(1.0 g,静脉注射,每日 1 次,共 10 天)或 BPG(240 万单位,肌肉注射,每周 1 次,共 2 周)。血清学反应定义为快速血浆反应素(RPR)滴度至少下降 4 倍。

结果

本研究共纳入 301 例早期梅毒患者,230 例完成随访。头孢曲松组 6 个月随访时血清学反应率为 90.2%,BPG 组为 78.0%(P =.01)。在原发性或早期潜伏性梅毒患者中,两组间无显著差异,但在二期梅毒患者中差异具有高度显著性(95.8%比 76.2%;P <.01)。此外,治疗后出现贾尔森-赫克斯海默反应的患者血清学反应时间可能更短(P =.03)。

结论

在本研究中,头孢曲松方案在非妊娠、免疫功能正常的早期梅毒患者中的疗效不劣于 BPG 方案。

临床试验注册

ChiCTR-TQR-13003624。

相似文献

1
A Multicenter Study Evaluating Ceftriaxone and Benzathine Penicillin G as Treatment Agents for Early Syphilis in Jiangsu, China.一项评估头孢曲松和苄星青霉素 G 治疗中国江苏早期梅毒的多中心研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 30;65(10):1683-1688. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix611.
2
One dose versus three weekly doses of benzathine penicillin G for patients co-infected with HIV and early syphilis: a multicenter, prospective observational study.苄星青霉素G单剂量与三周一次共三次剂量用于HIV合并早期梅毒患者的疗效比较:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 6;9(10):e109667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109667. eCollection 2014.
3
Oral linezolid compared with benzathine penicillin G for treatment of early syphilis in adults (Trep-AB Study) in Spain: a prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.西班牙一项前瞻性、开放标签、非劣效性、随机对照试验比较了口服利奈唑胺与苄星青霉素 G 治疗成人早期梅毒(Trep-AB 研究)。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2024 Apr;24(4):404-416. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00683-7. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
4
Doxycycline compared with benzathine penicillin for the treatment of early syphilis.多西环素与苄星青霉素治疗早期梅毒的比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Mar 15;42(6):e45-9. doi: 10.1086/500406. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
5
Comparison of serological response to doxycycline versus benzathine penicillin G in the treatment of early syphilis in HIV-infected patients: a multi-center observational study.比较感染 HIV 的早期梅毒患者使用多西环素与苄星青霉素 G 治疗的血清学应答:一项多中心观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 13;9(10):e109813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109813. eCollection 2014.
6
Single Dose Versus 3 Doses of Intramuscular Benzathine Penicillin for Early Syphilis in HIV: A Randomized Clinical Trial.单剂与 3 剂肌内注射苄星青霉素治疗 HIV 感染者早期梅毒的随机临床试验
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Mar 15;64(6):759-764. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw862.
7
Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction among HIV-positive patients with early syphilis: azithromycin versus benzathine penicillin G therapy.早期梅毒的HIV阳性患者中的吉海反应:阿奇霉素与苄星青霉素G治疗对比
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Aug 28;17(1):18993. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.1.18993. eCollection 2014.
8
A new enhanced antibiotic treatment for early and late syphilis.一种用于早期和晚期梅毒的新型增强抗生素治疗方法。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2016 Jun;5:64-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
9
A randomized, comparative pilot study of azithromycin versus benzathine penicillin G for treatment of early syphilis.阿奇霉素与苄星青霉素G治疗早期梅毒的随机对照试验性研究
Sex Transm Dis. 2002 Aug;29(8):486-90. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200208000-00010.
10
Single-dose azithromycin versus penicillin G benzathine for the treatment of early syphilis.单剂量阿奇霉素与苄星青霉素G治疗早期梅毒的比较
N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 22;353(12):1236-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044284.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding Horizons in Syphilis Treatment: Challenges, Advances, and Opportunities for Alternative Antibiotics.梅毒治疗的拓展视野:挑战、进展及替代抗生素的机遇
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2025 Mar 13;22(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s11904-025-00725-4.
2
Analysis of Neurosyphilis Imaging Methods and Treatment: A Focused Review.神经梅毒影像学方法与治疗分析:重点综述
Cureus. 2024 Nov 4;16(11):e72976. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72976. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
A 14-Year Retrospective Clinical Analysis of Ocular Manifestations of Syphilis in a Portuguese Tertiary Center.
葡萄牙一家三级医疗中心梅毒眼部表现的14年回顾性临床分析。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 29;18:3053-3069. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S494585. eCollection 2024.
4
Could ceftriaxone be a viable alternative to penicillin for the treatment of ocular syphilis?头孢曲松能否作为青霉素治疗眼梅毒的可行替代药物?
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 Jun 5;68(6):e0008024. doi: 10.1128/aac.00080-24. Epub 2024 May 6.
5
A large screen identifies beta-lactam antibiotics which can be repurposed to target the syphilis agent.一个大屏幕识别出可重新用于靶向梅毒病原体的β-内酰胺类抗生素。
NPJ Antimicrob Resist. 2023;1(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s44259-023-00006-3. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
6
Syphilis Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Investigating Nonpenicillin Therapeutic Strategies.梅毒治疗:探究非青霉素治疗策略的系统评价与荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 13;11(4):ofae142. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae142. eCollection 2024 Apr.
7
Selective adsorption and identification of penicillin G sodium in milk by molecularly imprinted polymer doped carbon dot.通过掺杂碳点的分子印迹聚合物对牛奶中青霉素 G 钠的选择性吸附和识别。
Mikrochim Acta. 2024 Mar 7;191(4):186. doi: 10.1007/s00604-024-06269-5.
8
Oral linezolid compared with benzathine penicillin G for treatment of early syphilis in adults (Trep-AB Study) in Spain: a prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.西班牙一项前瞻性、开放标签、非劣效性、随机对照试验比较了口服利奈唑胺与苄星青霉素 G 治疗成人早期梅毒(Trep-AB 研究)。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2024 Apr;24(4):404-416. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00683-7. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
9
Treatment of bacterial sexually transmitted infections in Europe: gonorrhoea, , and syphilis.欧洲细菌性性传播感染的治疗:淋病、衣原体感染和梅毒。 (原文中“chlamydia”缺失中文释义,这里补充完整)
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Oct 26;34:100737. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100737. eCollection 2023 Nov.
10
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum: an in-vitro study.苍白密螺旋体亚种苍白密螺旋体的抗菌药敏性:体外研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2023 Dec;4(12):e994-e1004. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00219-7. Epub 2023 Oct 9.