Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Medical Evidence and Observational Research, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 1;187(4):817-827. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx287.
Statins are indicated in patients with elevated levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and normal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol based on results of the multicountry trial, Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) (2003-2008), but the benefit in real-world populations remains unknown. We sought to generalize JUPITER results to trial-eligible population using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), 2001-2014. We multiply imputed missing baseline characteristics for the CPRD population and selected the trial-eligible participants as the target population based on observed and imputed values. Trial participants were weighted to be representative of the CPRD population (n = 383,418) based on individual predicted probability of selection into the trial. Trial participants were also standardized to the CPRD population without missing values (n = 2,677). In JUPITER, rosuvastatin reduced cardiovascular risk with a 3-year risk difference of -2.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): -2.9, -1.1). The rosuvastatin effect was muted in the first 2 years but remained strong at 3 years after standardizing to the imputed CPRD population (3-year risk difference = -2.7%; 95% CI: -5.8, 0.4) and the CPRD population without missing data (3-year risk difference = -1.7%; 95% CI: -3.5, 0.1). The study serves as an illustration of possible approaches to understanding generalizability of trials using real-world databases given limitations due to missing data on inclusion/exclusion criteria.
基于多国试验的结果,高敏 C 反应蛋白升高且低密度脂蛋白胆固醇正常的患者可使用他汀类药物,该试验为多国试验,名为 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE USE OF STATINS IN PREVENTION: AN INTERVENTION TRIAL EVALUATING ROSUVASTATIN (JUPITER) (2003-2008)。然而,实际人群中的获益仍不清楚。我们试图利用英国临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)2001-2014 年的数据,将 JUPITER 试验的结果推广至符合试验条件的人群。我们对 CPRD 人群的缺失基线特征进行多重插补,并根据观察值和插补值选择符合条件的参与者作为目标人群。我们对试验参与者进行加权,使其能够代表 CPRD 人群(n=383418),加权依据是个体入选试验的预测概率。试验参与者还被标准化为无缺失值的 CPRD 人群(n=2677)。在 JUPITER 试验中,与安慰剂相比,瑞舒伐他汀降低了 3 年心血管风险,风险差异为-2.0%(95%置信区间:-2.9,-1.1)。瑞舒伐他汀的效果在前 2 年减弱,但在标准化至插补后的 CPRD 人群(3 年风险差异=-2.7%;95%置信区间:-5.8,0.4)和无缺失值的 CPRD 人群(3 年风险差异=-1.7%;95%置信区间:-3.5,0.1)中仍保持较强的效果。该研究说明了在因纳入/排除标准缺失数据而存在局限性的情况下,使用真实世界数据库来理解试验的可推广性的可能方法。