• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者-提供者种族、民族和性别一致性对癌症筛查的影响:来自医疗支出调查的发现。

Impact of Patient-Provider Race, Ethnicity, and Gender Concordance on Cancer Screening: Findings from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

机构信息

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Department of Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Dec;26(12):1804-1811. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0660. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0660
PMID:29021217
Abstract

Racial and ethnic minorities experience lower rates of cancer screening compared with non-Hispanic whites (NHWs). Previous studies evaluating the role of patient-provider race, ethnicity, or gender concordance in cancer screening have been inconclusive. In a cross-sectional analysis using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), data from 2003 to 2010 were assessed for associations between patient-provider race, ethnicity, and/or gender concordance and, screening (American Cancer Society guidelines) for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. Multivariable logistic analyses were conducted to examine associations of interest. Of the 32,041 patient-provider pairs in our analysis, more than 60% of the patients were NHW, 15% were non-Hispanic black (NHB), and 15% were Hispanic. Overall, patients adherent to cancer screening were more likely to be non-Hispanic, better educated, married, wealthier, and privately insured. Patient-provider gender discordance was associated with lower rates of breast [OR, 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.76-0.90], cervical (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91), and colorectal cancer (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.90) screening in all patients. This association was also significant after adjusting for racial and/or ethnic concordance. Conversely, among NHWs and NHBs, patient-provider racial and/or ethnic concordance was not associated with screening. Among Hispanics, patient-provider ethnic discordant pairs had higher breast (58% vs. 52%) and colorectal cancer (45% vs. 39%) screening rates compared with concordant pairs. Patient-provider gender concordance positively affected cancer screening. Patient-provider ethnic concordance was inversely associated with receipt of cancer screening among Hispanics. This counter-intuitive finding requires further study. Our findings highlight the importance of gender concordance in improving cancer screening rates. .

摘要

少数民族和种族群体的癌症筛查率低于非西班牙裔白人(NHW)。以前评估患者-提供者种族、民族或性别一致性在癌症筛查中的作用的研究结果尚无定论。在使用医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)的横断面分析中,评估了 2003 年至 2010 年的数据,以评估患者-提供者种族、民族和/或性别一致性与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查(美国癌症协会指南)之间的关联。进行多变量逻辑分析以检查相关关联。在我们的分析中,32041 对患者-提供者中,超过 60%的患者是非西班牙裔白人,15%是非西班牙裔黑人(NHB),15%是西班牙裔。总体而言,遵守癌症筛查的患者更有可能是非西班牙裔、受教育程度更高、已婚、更富有、并拥有私人保险。患者-提供者性别不一致与所有患者的乳腺癌[比值比(OR),0.83;95%置信区间(CI),0.76-0.90]、宫颈癌(OR,0.83;95% CI,0.76-0.91)和结直肠癌(OR,0.84;95% CI,0.79-0.90)筛查率较低相关。在调整了种族和/或民族一致性后,这种关联仍然显著。相反,在 NHW 和 NHB 中,患者-提供者的种族和/或民族一致性与筛查无关。在西班牙裔中,与匹配对相比,患者-提供者种族不一致的对乳腺癌(58%比 52%)和结直肠癌(45%比 39%)的筛查率更高。患者-提供者性别一致性对癌症筛查产生积极影响。患者-提供者民族一致性与西班牙裔接受癌症筛查呈负相关。这种与直觉相悖的发现需要进一步研究。我们的研究结果强调了性别一致性在提高癌症筛查率方面的重要性。

相似文献

1
Impact of Patient-Provider Race, Ethnicity, and Gender Concordance on Cancer Screening: Findings from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.患者-提供者种族、民族和性别一致性对癌症筛查的影响:来自医疗支出调查的发现。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Dec;26(12):1804-1811. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0660. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
2
The Impact of Patient-Provider Race/Ethnicity Concordance on Provider Visits: Updated Evidence from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.患者-医生种族/民族一致性对就诊次数的影响:来自医疗支出调查的最新证据。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Oct;6(5):1011-1020. doi: 10.1007/s40615-019-00602-y. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
3
Gender- and Race-Based Differences in Barriers and Facilitators to Early Detection of Colon Cancer.性别和种族差异对结肠癌早期检测的障碍和促进因素。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Sep;29(9):1192-1202. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8163. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
4
Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening: the importance of foreign birth as a barrier to care.癌症筛查中的种族和民族差异:外国出生作为医疗障碍的重要性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Dec;18(12):1028-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.20807.x.
5
Colorectal Cancer Incidence Trends by Age, Stage, and Racial/Ethnic Group in California, 1990-2014.加利福尼亚州 1990-2014 年按年龄、分期和种族/族裔划分的结直肠癌发病率趋势
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Sep;27(9):1011-1018. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0030. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
6
Patient-Centered Medical Home and Up-To-Date on Screening for Breast and Colorectal Cancer.以患者为中心的医疗之家和最新的乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jan;58(1):107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.08.030.
7
The Role of Ethnic and Racial Disparities in Mobility and Physical Function in Older Adults.老年人流动能力和身体功能中的种族和民族差异的作用。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 May;39(5):502-508. doi: 10.1177/0733464818780631. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
8
Patient and provider characteristics associated with colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening among Asian Americans.与亚裔美国人结直肠癌、乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查相关的患者及医疗服务提供者特征。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Nov;23(11):2208-17. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0487.
9
Patient-provider sex and race/ethnicity concordance: a national study of healthcare and outcomes.患者-提供者性别和种族/民族一致性:一项关于医疗保健和结果的全国性研究。
Med Care. 2011 Nov;49(11):1012-20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31823688ee.
10
Association of Racial/Ethnic and Gender Concordance Between Patients and Physicians With Patient Experience Ratings.患者与医生的种族/民族和性别一致性与患者体验评分的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024583. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24583.

引用本文的文献

1
Bias in vital signs? Machine learning models can learn patients' race or ethnicity from the values of vital signs alone.生命体征中的偏见?机器学习模型仅通过生命体征值就能了解患者的种族或民族。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Jul 10;32(1):e101098. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101098.
2
Patient-Clinician Sex and Race and/or Ethnicity Concordance and Adherence to Preventive Services Guidelines: MEPS 2018-2020.患者与临床医生的性别、种族和/或族裔一致性以及对预防服务指南的遵循情况:2018 - 2020年医疗支出面板调查
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09631-2.
3
Rural Patients' Perceived Importance of Racial and Ethnic Concordance With Providers and Receipt of Annual Routine Visits.
农村患者对与医疗服务提供者种族和民族匹配以及接受年度常规就诊的感知重要性。
J Patient Exp. 2025 May 20;12:23743735251341732. doi: 10.1177/23743735251341732. eCollection 2025.
4
Structural Racism in Cervical Cancer Care and Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Inequities and Barriers.宫颈癌护理与生存结果中的结构性种族主义:对不平等与障碍的系统评价
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2025;12(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s40471-025-00360-y. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
5
Patient-Provider Concordance Reduces Missed Appointments in Texas Primary Care Safety-Net Clinics.患者与医疗服务提供者的协调一致减少了得克萨斯州基层医疗安全网诊所的预约失约情况。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02411-y.
6
Anti-Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Legislation: Potential Impacts on Oncology Nursing Workforce Diversity and Patient Health Outcomes.反多元化、公平和包容立法:对肿瘤护理劳动力多样性和患者健康结果的潜在影响。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Jan 17;29(1):100-103. doi: 10.1188/25.CJON.100-103.
7
The Resident Scholars Program for Workforce Diversity: A Qualitative Study About Supporting Family Medicine Abortion Providers.劳动力多元化住院医师学者项目:关于支持家庭医学堕胎提供者的定性研究。
Fam Med. 2025 Mar;57(3):168-176. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.484479. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
8
Race and Ethnicity, Gender, and Promotion of Physicians in Academic Medicine.种族和民族、性别与学术医学中的医师晋升
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446018. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46018.
9
Factors associated with clinician willingness to adopt HPV self-sampling and self-testing for cervical cancer screening.与临床医生采用人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我采样和自我检测进行宫颈癌筛查意愿相关的因素。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Sep 16;8(1):e118. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.604. eCollection 2024.
10
Do Black doctors save more Black babies?黑人医生能拯救更多黑人婴儿吗?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 24;121(39):e2415159121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2415159121. Epub 2024 Sep 16.