University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY, USA.
School of Nursing Family University of North Carolina, Greensboro, USA.
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 May;39(5):502-508. doi: 10.1177/0733464818780631. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
To compare estimates of the prevalence of mobility and physical function limitations by race and ethnicity using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). The sample comprised of 28,854 adults aged ≥60 from the MEPS (2004-2013). Physical function (limitations in basic and instrumental activities of daily living [ADL/IADL]) and mobility limitations were assessed by self-report. Non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs) represented the majority of the sample followed by non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs), Hispanic and non-Hispanic Other (Other). For mobility limitation, NHBs had the highest prevalence followed by NHWs and Hispanics (33.3%, 28.6%, and 26.2%, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for the primary outcome of mobility limitation. In the adjusted model, Hispanics had lower odds of mobility limitations (prevalence odds ratio [POR]: 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.67,0.91]) compared with NHWs. For ADL limitations, NHBs had higher odds of having ADLs (POR: 1.87; 95% CI = [1.44, 2.44]) when compared with NHWs. This article evaluated the influence of race and ethnicity, on the prevalence of mobility and functional limitations that are not always consistent with expected racial and ethnic differences.
为了比较使用医疗支出调查(MEPS)数据按种族和民族划分的流动性和身体功能受限的流行率估计值。 该样本包括来自 MEPS(2004-2013 年)的 28854 名年龄≥60 岁的成年人。通过自我报告评估身体功能(日常生活活动的基本和工具性活动受限[ADL / IADL])和流动性受限。 非西班牙裔白人(NHW)占样本的大多数,其次是非西班牙裔黑人(NHB),西班牙裔和非西班牙裔其他(其他)。对于流动性限制,NHB 的患病率最高,其次是 NHW 和西班牙裔(分别为 33.3%,28.6%和 26.2%)。对主要结局即流动性限制进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。在调整后的模型中,与 NHW 相比,西班牙裔的流动性受限可能性较低(流行率优势比[POR]:0.78; 95%置信区间[CI] = [0.67,0.91])。对于 ADL 限制,与 NHW 相比,NHB 具有更高的 ADL 可能性(POR:1.87; 95%CI = [1.44,2.44])。 本文评估了种族和民族对流动性和功能受限的流行率的影响,而这些影响并不总是与预期的种族和民族差异一致。