• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前牛津髋关节与膝关节评分的变异性:是否存在理想的评分时间?

The variability in Oxford hip and knee scores in the preoperative period: is there an ideal time to score?

作者信息

Quah C, Holmes D, Khan T, Cockshott S, Lewis J, Stephen A

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery , Royal Derby Hospital, Derby , UK.

Department of Academic Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Jan;100(1):16-20. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0090. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2017.0090
PMID:29022778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5838660/
Abstract

Background All NHS-funded providers are required to collect and report patient-reported outcome measures for hip and knee arthroplasty. Although there are established guidelines for timing such measures following arthroplasty, there are no specific time-points for collection in the preoperative period. The primary aim of this study was to identify whether there was a significant amount of variability in the Oxford hip and knee scores prior to surgical intervention when completed in the outpatient clinic at the time of listing for arthroplasty or when completed at the preoperative assessment clinic. Methods A prospective cohort study of patients listed for primary hip or knee arthroplasty was conducted. Patients were asked to fill in a preoperative Oxford score in the outpatient clinic at the time of listing. They were then invited to fill in the official outcome measures questionnaire at the preoperative assessment clinic. The postoperative Oxford score was then completed when the patient was seen again at their postoperative follow up in clinic. Results Of the total of 109 patients included in this study period, there were 18 (17%) who had a worse score of 4 or more points difference and 43 (39.4%) who had an improvement of 4 or more points difference when the scores were compared between time of listing at the outpatient and at the preoperative assessment clinic. There was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0054) in the mean Oxford scores. Conclusions The results of our study suggest that there should be standardisation of timing for completing the preoperative patient-reported outcome measures.

摘要

背景

所有由英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)资助的医疗机构都必须收集并报告髋关节和膝关节置换术患者报告的结局指标。尽管对于置换术后这些指标的测量时间有既定指南,但术前并无具体的收集时间点。本研究的主要目的是确定在门诊进行关节置换术登记时或在术前评估门诊完成的术前牛津髋关节和膝关节评分,在手术干预前是否存在显著差异。

方法

对计划进行初次髋关节或膝关节置换术的患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。患者在门诊登记时被要求填写术前牛津评分。然后,他们被邀请在术前评估门诊填写官方结局指标问卷。患者在术后门诊随访再次就诊时完成术后牛津评分。

结果

在本研究期间纳入的109例患者中,门诊登记时与术前评估门诊时的评分相比,有18例(17%)评分差4分或更多,43例(39.4%)评分提高4分或更多。牛津平均评分存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.0054)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,术前患者报告的结局指标的测量时间应标准化。

相似文献

1
The variability in Oxford hip and knee scores in the preoperative period: is there an ideal time to score?术前牛津髋关节与膝关节评分的变异性:是否存在理想的评分时间?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Jan;100(1):16-20. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0090. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
2
The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine tool to select candidates for hip and knee replacement surgery: development and economic modelling.人工关节置换候选帮助引擎工具选择髋关节和膝关节置换手术的候选者:开发和经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(32):1-216. doi: 10.3310/hta23320.
3
Rationing for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using the New Zealand Orthopaedic Association Score: Effectiveness and Comparison With Patient-Reported Scores.使用新西兰骨科协会评分法对全髋关节和膝关节置换术进行配给:有效性及与患者报告评分的比较
J Arthroplasty. 2016 May;31(5):957-62. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.11.022. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
4
Can the Oxford Knee and Hip Score identify patients who do not require total knee or hip arthroplasty?牛津膝关节和髋关节评分能否识别不需要全膝关节或髋关节置换术的患者?
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6_Supple_B):23-30. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1460.R1.
5
Joint awareness in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee evaluated with the 'Forgotten Joint' Score before and after joint replacement.使用“遗忘关节”评分评估髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎患者关节置换前后的关节认知。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3346-3351. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3970-4. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
6
Associations between preoperative Oxford hip and knee scores and costs and quality of life of patients undergoing primary total joint replacement in the NHS England: an observational study.英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中初次全关节置换患者术前牛津髋关节与膝关节评分与费用及生活质量的关联:一项观察性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 10;8(4):e019477. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019477.
7
Patient-reported health outcomes after total hip and knee surgery in a Dutch University Hospital Setting: results of twenty years clinical registry.荷兰大学医院环境下全髋关节和膝关节置换术后患者报告的健康结局:20年临床登记结果
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Mar 3;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1455-y.
8
How effective is our current Orthopaedic Prioritisation Tool for scoring patients for arthroplasty surgery?我们目前的骨科手术优先级评估工具在对关节置换手术患者进行评分方面的效果如何?
N Z Med J. 2016 Sep 23;129(1442):52-9.
9
Rationing of hip and knee replacement: effect on the severity of patient-reported symptoms and the demand for surgery in Otago.髋关节和膝关节置换手术的配给:对患者报告症状严重程度及奥塔哥地区手术需求的影响
N Z Med J. 2016 Apr 1;129(1432):59-66.
10
Comparative outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.全髋关节和膝关节置换术的比较结果:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Postgrad Med J. 2012 Nov;88(1045):627-31. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130715. Epub 2012 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of avascular necrosis in sickle cell disease using joint-specific patient-reported outcome measures: Results from a multicentre study.使用特定关节患者报告结局指标评估镰状细胞病中无血管性坏死的长期结局:一项多中心研究的结果
Br J Haematol. 2025 Jan;206(1):310-319. doi: 10.1111/bjh.19802. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Cancellation and short postponement of primary hip or knee arthroplasty does not influence postoperative joint specific function or health related quality of life.初次髋关节或膝关节置换术的取消和短期延期并不会影响术后关节特异性功能或与健康相关的生活质量。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec;34(8):3973-3979. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04088-1. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
3
Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes after two different hypoallergenic medial unicompartmental knee in patients with metal allergy.两种不同的低变应原性内侧单髁膝关节置换术治疗金属过敏患者的临床和影像学结果相似。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):1315-1328. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03295-y. Epub 2022 May 29.
4
No Clinical or Radiographic Differences Between Cemented Cobalt-Chromium and Titanium-Niobium Nitride Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.骨水泥型钴铬合金与氮化钛铌活动平台单髁膝关节置换术在临床及影像学上无差异。
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Aug 15;55(5):1195-1201. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00486-3. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
Outcome measures in total hip arthroplasty: have our metrics changed over 15 years?全髋关节置换术的疗效评估指标:15年来我们的指标有变化吗?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Aug;142(8):1753-1762. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03809-z. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
6
Intraarticular osteotomy of malunited tibial plateau fractures: an analysis of clinical results with a mean follow-up after 4 years.关节内切开术治疗胫骨平台骨折畸形愈合:平均随访 4 年后的临床结果分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Dec;46(6):1203-1209. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01440-y. Epub 2020 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset.英格兰和威尔士翻修全膝关节和髋关节置换术的流行病学:与美国预测的比较分析。一项使用国家关节注册数据集的研究。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Aug;97-B(8):1076-81. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.35170.
2
Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery.关节置换手术后牛津髋关节和膝关节评分的有意义变化。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
3
Use of SMS and tablet computer improves the electronic collection of elective orthopaedic patient reported outcome measures.短信和平板电脑的使用改善了择期骨科患者报告结局指标的电子收集情况。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014 Jul;96(5):348-51. doi: 10.1308/003588414X13946184900769.
4
The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative research.专业人员运用患者报告结局测量信息以提高医疗质量的经验:一项定性研究的系统评价
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jun;23(6):508-18. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002524. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
5
Patients' perspectives on total knee replacement.患者对全膝关节置换术的看法。
Am J Nurs. 2008 May;108(5):54-63; quiz 63-4. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000318000.62786.fb.
6
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.牛津髋关节和膝关节评分的应用。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1010-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424.
7
The Oxford hip score: the patient's perspective.牛津髋关节评分:患者视角
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Oct 31;3:66. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-66.
8
The Oxford Knee Score; problems and pitfalls.牛津膝关节评分:问题与陷阱
Knee. 2005 Aug;12(4):287-91. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2004.11.005.