Suppr超能文献

术前牛津髋关节与膝关节评分的变异性:是否存在理想的评分时间?

The variability in Oxford hip and knee scores in the preoperative period: is there an ideal time to score?

作者信息

Quah C, Holmes D, Khan T, Cockshott S, Lewis J, Stephen A

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery , Royal Derby Hospital, Derby , UK.

Department of Academic Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Jan;100(1):16-20. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0090. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

Abstract

Background All NHS-funded providers are required to collect and report patient-reported outcome measures for hip and knee arthroplasty. Although there are established guidelines for timing such measures following arthroplasty, there are no specific time-points for collection in the preoperative period. The primary aim of this study was to identify whether there was a significant amount of variability in the Oxford hip and knee scores prior to surgical intervention when completed in the outpatient clinic at the time of listing for arthroplasty or when completed at the preoperative assessment clinic. Methods A prospective cohort study of patients listed for primary hip or knee arthroplasty was conducted. Patients were asked to fill in a preoperative Oxford score in the outpatient clinic at the time of listing. They were then invited to fill in the official outcome measures questionnaire at the preoperative assessment clinic. The postoperative Oxford score was then completed when the patient was seen again at their postoperative follow up in clinic. Results Of the total of 109 patients included in this study period, there were 18 (17%) who had a worse score of 4 or more points difference and 43 (39.4%) who had an improvement of 4 or more points difference when the scores were compared between time of listing at the outpatient and at the preoperative assessment clinic. There was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0054) in the mean Oxford scores. Conclusions The results of our study suggest that there should be standardisation of timing for completing the preoperative patient-reported outcome measures.

摘要

背景

所有由英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)资助的医疗机构都必须收集并报告髋关节和膝关节置换术患者报告的结局指标。尽管对于置换术后这些指标的测量时间有既定指南,但术前并无具体的收集时间点。本研究的主要目的是确定在门诊进行关节置换术登记时或在术前评估门诊完成的术前牛津髋关节和膝关节评分,在手术干预前是否存在显著差异。

方法

对计划进行初次髋关节或膝关节置换术的患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。患者在门诊登记时被要求填写术前牛津评分。然后,他们被邀请在术前评估门诊填写官方结局指标问卷。患者在术后门诊随访再次就诊时完成术后牛津评分。

结果

在本研究期间纳入的109例患者中,门诊登记时与术前评估门诊时的评分相比,有18例(17%)评分差4分或更多,43例(39.4%)评分提高4分或更多。牛津平均评分存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.0054)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,术前患者报告的结局指标的测量时间应标准化。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Patients' perspectives on total knee replacement.患者对全膝关节置换术的看法。
Am J Nurs. 2008 May;108(5):54-63; quiz 63-4. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000318000.62786.fb.
6
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.牛津髋关节和膝关节评分的应用。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1010-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424.
7
The Oxford hip score: the patient's perspective.牛津髋关节评分:患者视角
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Oct 31;3:66. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-66.
8
The Oxford Knee Score; problems and pitfalls.牛津膝关节评分:问题与陷阱
Knee. 2005 Aug;12(4):287-91. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2004.11.005.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验