From the Université René Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (T.B., P.M., M.K., M.B., S.P., M.Z., C.O., J.F.M., N.B., F.B., C.S.R., O.N.); Departments of Pediatric Neurosurgery (T.B., M.B., S.P., M.Z., C.S.R.), Anesthesiology (P.M.), Pediatric Neurology (M.K.), and Pediatric Radiology (A.G., C.J., N.B., F.B., O.N.), Necker Enfants Malades Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; and Service d'Imagerie Morphologique et Fonctionnelle, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, 75014 Paris, France; Inserm U894, Université Paris-Descartes, 12, rue de l'École-de-Médecine, 75270 Paris cedex 06, France (G.B., C.O., J.F.M., O.N.).
Radiology. 2018 Feb;286(2):651-658. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170152. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
Purpose To propose and validate a modified pediatric intracerebral hemorrhage (PICH) (mPICH) score and to compare its association with functional outcome to that of the original PICH score. Materials and Methods Data from prospectively included patients were retrospectively analyzed. Consecutive patients with nontraumatic PICH who had undergone clinical follow-up were included. The study population was divided into a development cohort (2008-2012, n = 100) and a validation cohort (2013-2016, n = 43). An mPICH score was developed after variables associated with poor outcome were identified at multivariate analysis (King's Outcome Scale for Childhood Head Injury score < 5a) in the development cohort. The accuracy of the score for prediction of poor outcome was evaluated (sensitivity, specificity). Discrimination and calibration of associations between the mPICH score and poor outcome cohorts were assessed (C statistics, Hosmer-Lemeshow test). Results The mPICH score assessed as follows: brain herniation, four points; altered mental status, three points; hydrocephalus, two points; infratentorial PICH, two points; intraventricular hemorrhage, one point; PICH volume greater than 2% of total brain volume, one point. An mPICH score greater than 5 was associated with severe disability or worse, with sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83%, 100%) and specificity of 61% (95% CI: 49%, 73%). The C statistic was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.89). In the validation cohort, sensitivity and specificity were 95.2% (95% CI: 76%, 99%) and 77% (95% CI: 55%, 92%), respectively. There was no significant difference between the observed and predicted risks of poor outcome (P = .46). Conclusion An mPICH score was developed as a simple clinical and imaging grading scale for acute prognosis in patients with PICH. RSNA, 2017.
提出并验证改良小儿颅内出血(mPICH)评分,并比较其与功能结局的相关性与原始 PICH 评分的相关性。
回顾性分析前瞻性纳入患者的数据。纳入接受临床随访的非创伤性 PICH 连续患者。研究人群分为发展队列(2008-2012 年,n=100)和验证队列(2013-2016 年,n=43)。在发展队列中,通过多变量分析(King 儿童头部外伤结果量表评分<5a)确定与不良预后相关的变量后,建立 mPICH 评分。评估评分预测不良预后的准确性(灵敏度、特异性)。评估 mPICH 评分与不良预后队列之间关联的区分度和校准度(C 统计量、Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验)。
mPICH 评分评估如下:脑疝,4 分;意识状态改变,3 分;脑积水,2 分;幕下 PICH,2 分;脑室内出血,1 分;PICH 体积大于总脑体积的 2%,1 分。mPICH 评分大于 5 分与严重残疾或更差相关,灵敏度为 97%(95%置信区间:83%,100%),特异性为 61%(95%置信区间:49%,73%)。C 统计量为 0.81(95%置信区间:0.73,0.89)。在验证队列中,灵敏度和特异性分别为 95.2%(95%置信区间:76%,99%)和 77%(95%置信区间:55%,92%)。不良预后的观察风险与预测风险之间无显著差异(P=0.46)。
建立 mPICH 评分作为一种简单的临床和影像学分级评分,用于预测 PICH 患者的急性预后。
放射学会,2017 年。