• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地震风险评估中不确定性理解框架

A Framework for Understanding Uncertainty in Seismic Risk Assessment.

作者信息

Foulser-Piggott Roxane, Bowman Gary, Hughes Martin

机构信息

School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Bond Business School, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2020 Jan;40(1):169-182. doi: 10.1111/risa.12919. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1111/risa.12919
PMID:29023965
Abstract

A better understanding of the uncertainty that exists in models used for seismic risk assessment is critical to improving risk-based decisions pertaining to earthquake safety. Current models estimating the probability of collapse of a building do not consider comprehensively the nature and impact of uncertainty. This article presents a model framework to enhance seismic risk assessment and thus gives decisionmakers a fuller understanding of the nature and limitations of the estimates. This can help ensure that risks are not over- or underestimated and the value of acquiring accurate data is appreciated fully. The methodology presented provides a novel treatment of uncertainties in input variables, their propagation through the model, and their effect on the results. The study presents ranges of possible annual collapse probabilities for different case studies on buildings in different parts of the world, exposed to different levels of seismicity, and with different vulnerabilities. A global sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the significance of uncertain variables. Two key outcomes are (1) that the uncertainty in ground-motion conversion equations has the largest effect on the uncertainty in the calculation of annual collapse probability; and (2) the vulnerability of a building appears to have an effect on the range of annual collapse probabilities produced, i.e., the level of uncertainty in the estimate of annual collapse probability, with less vulnerable buildings having a smaller uncertainty.

摘要

更好地理解用于地震风险评估的模型中存在的不确定性,对于改进与地震安全相关的基于风险的决策至关重要。当前估计建筑物倒塌概率的模型并未全面考虑不确定性的性质和影响。本文提出了一个模型框架来加强地震风险评估,从而使决策者更全面地理解估计值的性质和局限性。这有助于确保风险既不会被高估也不会被低估,并且能充分认识到获取准确数据的价值。所提出的方法对输入变量中的不确定性、它们在模型中的传播以及它们对结果的影响进行了新颖的处理。该研究给出了针对世界不同地区、遭受不同地震活动水平且具有不同脆弱性的建筑物的不同案例研究的可能年倒塌概率范围。进行了全局敏感性分析以确定不确定变量的重要性。两个关键结果是:(1)地面运动转换方程中的不确定性对年倒塌概率计算中的不确定性影响最大;(2)建筑物的脆弱性似乎会对所产生的年倒塌概率范围产生影响,即年倒塌概率估计中的不确定性水平,较不易受损的建筑物不确定性较小。

相似文献

1
A Framework for Understanding Uncertainty in Seismic Risk Assessment.地震风险评估中不确定性理解框架
Risk Anal. 2020 Jan;40(1):169-182. doi: 10.1111/risa.12919. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
2
Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty.天然地震活动和诱发地震活动的地震灾害与风险分析:面对不确定性进行客观评估。
Bull Earthq Eng. 2022;20(6):2825-3069. doi: 10.1007/s10518-022-01357-4. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
3
Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.地震震动与建筑物损坏:近期关于强烈地面震动的证据引发了对建筑物抗震能力的质疑。
Science. 1975 Aug 22;189(4203):601-8. doi: 10.1126/science.189.4203.601.
4
"This Is What We Don't Know": Treating Epistemic Uncertainty in Bayesian Networks for Risk Assessment.“这是我们不知道的”:在风险评估的贝叶斯网络中处理认知不确定性。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Jan;17(1):221-232. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4367. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
5
Progressive collapse potential of different types of irregular buildings located in diverse seismic sites.位于不同地震场地的不同类型不规则建筑的连续倒塌可能性。
Heliyon. 2019 Jan 16;5(1):e01137. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01137. eCollection 2019 Jan.
6
Development of seismic vulnerability index methodology for reinforced concrete buildings based on nonlinear parametric analyses.基于非线性参数分析的钢筋混凝土建筑地震易损性指数方法的开发。
MethodsX. 2019 Jan 26;6:199-211. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.01.006. eCollection 2019.
7
The Impact of Portfolio Location Uncertainty on Probabilistic Seismic Risk Analysis.投资组合位置不确定性对概率地震风险分析的影响。
Risk Anal. 2019 Mar;39(3):695-712. doi: 10.1111/risa.13176. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
8
Seismic collapse risk of RC-timber hybrid building with different energy dissipation connections considering NBCC 2020 hazard.考虑2020年国家建筑规范(NBCC)危害的不同耗能连接的钢筋混凝土-木结构混合建筑的地震倒塌风险
J Infrastruct Preserv Resil. 2022;3(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s43065-022-00061-6. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
9
Seismic vulnerability assessment of urban buildings using the rough set theory and weighted linear combination.基于粗糙集理论和加权线性组合的城市建筑物地震易损性评估
J Mt Sci. 2022;19(3):849-861. doi: 10.1007/s11629-021-6724-4. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
10
Handling Uncertainty in Models of Seismic and Postseismic Hazards: Toward Robust Methods and Resilient Societies.处理地震和震后灾害模型中的不确定性:走向稳健的方法和有弹性的社会。
Risk Anal. 2021 Sep;41(9):1499-1512. doi: 10.1111/risa.13663. Epub 2020 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Why do seismic hazard models worldwide appear to overpredict historical intensity observations?为什么全球的地震危险性模型似乎高估了历史烈度观测值?
Sci Adv. 2024 May 3;10(18):eadj9291. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adj9291.