• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阳离子诱导的 DNA 折纸纳米结构在尿素和盐酸胍中的稳定和变性。

Cation-Induced Stabilization and Denaturation of DNA Origami Nanostructures in Urea and Guanidinium Chloride.

机构信息

Technical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Paderborn University, Warburger Str. 100, 33098, Paderborn, Germany.

B CUBE - Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Arnoldstr. 18, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Small. 2017 Nov;13(44). doi: 10.1002/smll.201702100. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1002/smll.201702100
PMID:29024433
Abstract

The stability of DNA origami nanostructures under various environmental conditions constitutes an important issue in numerous applications, including drug delivery, molecular sensing, and single-molecule biophysics. Here, the effect of Na and Mg concentrations on DNA origami stability is investigated in the presence of urea and guanidinium chloride (GdmCl), two strong denaturants commonly employed in protein folding studies. While increasing concentrations of both cations stabilize the DNA origami nanostructures against urea denaturation, they are found to promote DNA origami denaturation by GdmCl. These inverse behaviors are rationalized by a salting-out of Gdm to the hydrophobic DNA base stack. The effect of cation-induced DNA origami denaturation by GdmCl deserves consideration in the design of single-molecule studies and may potentially be exploited in future applications such as selective denaturation for purification purposes.

摘要

在各种环境条件下,DNA 折纸纳米结构的稳定性是许多应用的重要问题,包括药物输送、分子传感和单分子生物物理学。在这里,研究了在存在尿素和胍盐酸盐(GdmCl)的情况下,Na 和 Mg 浓度对 DNA 折纸稳定性的影响,尿素和 GdmCl 是常用于蛋白质折叠研究的两种强变性剂。虽然两种阳离子的浓度增加都能稳定 DNA 折纸纳米结构抵抗尿素变性,但它们被发现能促进 GdmCl 诱导的 DNA 折纸变性。这种相反的行为可以通过 Gdm 盐析到疏水性 DNA 碱基堆叠来合理化。GdmCl 诱导的阳离子引起的 DNA 折纸变性的影响在单分子研究的设计中值得考虑,并且可能在未来的应用中得到利用,例如选择性变性用于纯化目的。

相似文献

1
Cation-Induced Stabilization and Denaturation of DNA Origami Nanostructures in Urea and Guanidinium Chloride.阳离子诱导的 DNA 折纸纳米结构在尿素和盐酸胍中的稳定和变性。
Small. 2017 Nov;13(44). doi: 10.1002/smll.201702100. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
2
Superstructure-dependent stability of DNA origami nanostructures in the presence of chaotropic denaturants.在离液剂存在下 DNA 折纸纳米结构的上层结构依赖性稳定性。
Nanoscale. 2023 Oct 26;15(41):16590-16600. doi: 10.1039/d3nr02045b.
3
Time-Dependent DNA Origami Denaturation by Guanidinium Chloride, Guanidinium Sulfate, and Guanidinium Thiocyanate.时间依赖性 DNA 折纸的胍氯化物、胍硫酸盐和硫氰酸胍变性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Aug 1;23(15):8547. doi: 10.3390/ijms23158547.
4
Structural stability of DNA origami nanostructures in the presence of chaotropic agents.在变性剂存在的情况下 DNA 折纸纳米结构的结构稳定性。
Nanoscale. 2016 May 21;8(19):10398-405. doi: 10.1039/c6nr00835f. Epub 2016 May 4.
5
Protein folding: Molecular dynamics simulations and in vitro studies for probing mechanism of urea- and guanidinium chloride-induced unfolding of horse cytochrome-c.蛋白质折叠:分子动力学模拟和体外研究探测尿素和盐酸胍诱导马细胞色素 c 变性的机制。
Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Feb 1;122:695-704. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.186. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
6
Sequence specific hydrogen bond of DNA with denaturants affects its stability: Spectroscopic and simulation studies.DNA与变性剂的序列特异性氢键影响其稳定性:光谱学和模拟研究。
Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2021 Jan;1865(1):129735. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2020.129735. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
Alteration of the groove width of DNA induced by the multimodal hydrogen bonding of denaturants with DNA bases in its grooves affects their stability.变性剂与 DNA 沟槽碱基的多模态氢键作用导致 DNA 沟槽宽度的改变,从而影响其稳定性。
Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2020 Mar;1864(3):129498. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.129498. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
8
Guanidinium chloride- and urea-induced unfolding of the dimeric enzyme glucose oxidase.盐酸胍和尿素诱导的二聚体酶葡萄糖氧化酶的去折叠
Biochemistry. 2002 Mar 19;41(11):3819-27. doi: 10.1021/bi0116700.
9
Guanidinium chloride- and urea-induced unfolding of FprA, a mycobacterium NADPH-ferredoxin reductase: stabilization of an apo-protein by GdmCl.氯化胍和尿素诱导的分枝杆菌NADPH-铁氧化还原蛋白还原酶FprA的去折叠:盐酸胍对脱辅基蛋白的稳定作用
FEBS J. 2005 May;272(9):2216-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.2005.04645.x.
10
Destabilization of Hydrophobic Core of Chicken Villin Headpiece in Guanidinium Chloride Induced Denaturation: Hint of π-Cation Interaction.氯化胍诱导的鸡肌动蛋白头部疏水核心去稳定化:π-阳离子相互作用的线索
J Phys Chem B. 2016 Sep 15;120(36):9599-607. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b06325. Epub 2016 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Time-Dependent DNA Origami Denaturation by Guanidinium Chloride, Guanidinium Sulfate, and Guanidinium Thiocyanate.时间依赖性 DNA 折纸的胍氯化物、胍硫酸盐和硫氰酸胍变性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Aug 1;23(15):8547. doi: 10.3390/ijms23158547.
2
Anion-specific structure and stability of guanidinium-bound DNA origami.胍基结合的DNA折纸的阴离子特异性结构与稳定性
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022 May 23;20:2611-2623. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.05.037. eCollection 2022.
3
Salting-Out of DNA Origami Nanostructures by Ammonium Sulfate.硫酸铵盐析 DNA 折纸纳米结构。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 4;23(5):2817. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052817.
4
Magnesium-Free Immobilization of DNA Origami Nanostructures at Mica Surfaces for Atomic Force Microscopy.无镁条件下 DNA 折纸纳米结构在云母表面的固定及其原子力显微镜研究。
Molecules. 2021 Aug 7;26(16):4798. doi: 10.3390/molecules26164798.
5
modelling of DNA nanostructures.DNA纳米结构的建模
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020 May 22;18:1191-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.05.016. eCollection 2020.
6
Challenges and Perspectives of DNA Nanostructures in Biomedicine.DNA 纳米结构在生物医学中的挑战与展望。
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020 Sep 7;59(37):15818-15833. doi: 10.1002/anie.201916390. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
7
Effect of Staple Age on DNA Origami Nanostructure Assembly and Stability.订书钉年龄对 DNA 折纸纳米结构组装和稳定性的影响。
Molecules. 2019 Jul 16;24(14):2577. doi: 10.3390/molecules24142577.
8
Structural stability of DNA origami nanostructures under application-specific conditions.特定应用条件下DNA折纸纳米结构的结构稳定性
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2018 Sep 18;16:342-349. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2018.09.002. eCollection 2018.