Suppr超能文献

可步行性、完整街道与性别:谁受益最大?

Walkability, complete streets, and gender: Who benefits most?

机构信息

Department of Family&Consumer Studies, University of Utah, 225S 1400 E RM 228, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, 680N Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

Health Place. 2017 Nov;48:80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.007.

Abstract

Does street walkability and a new complete street renovation relate to street use and gender composition? We audited two mixed-walkability complete streets ("complete less-urban" and "complete-urban"), one low-walkable street, and one high-walkable street at pre-renovation and twice post-renovation. Complete street users increased, especially for the complete-less urban street. Typically, the high-walkable street attracted the most and the low-walkable street attracted the fewest total people, males, and females; complete streets were in between. On blocks with people, females were only 29% of users; females were much less common on low- walkable streets. Street improvements might enhance gender equity.

摘要

街道的可步行性和全新的完整街道改造与街道使用和性别构成有关吗?我们在改造前和两次改造后分别对两条混合可步行性完整街道(“较不完整的城市型”和“完整的城市型”)、一条低可步行性街道和一条高可步行性街道进行了审核。完整街道的使用者增加了,尤其是在较不完整的城市型街道。通常情况下,高可步行性街道吸引的人数最多,低可步行性街道吸引的人数最少,完整街道则介于两者之间。在有人居住的街区,女性使用者仅占 29%;而在低可步行性街道上,女性则更为少见。街道的改善可能会增强性别平等。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验