• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于下一代测序的临床肿瘤学检测实践之窗。

A Window Into Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Oncology Testing Practices.

作者信息

Nagarajan Rakesh, Bartley Angela N, Bridge Julia A, Jennings Lawrence J, Kamel-Reid Suzanne, Kim Annette, Lazar Alexander J, Lindeman Neal I, Moncur Joel, Rai Alex J, Routbort Mark J, Vasalos Patricia, Merker Jason D

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Dec;141(12):1679-1685. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0542-CP. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

DOI:10.5858/arpa.2016-0542-CP
PMID:29028368
Abstract

CONTEXT

  • Detection of acquired variants in cancer is a paradigm of precision medicine, yet little has been reported about clinical laboratory practices across a broad range of laboratories.

OBJECTIVE

  • To use College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey results to report on the results from surveys on next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing practices.

DESIGN

  • College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey results from more than 250 laboratories currently performing molecular oncology testing were used to determine laboratory trends in next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing.

RESULTS

  • These presented data provide key information about the number of laboratories that currently offer or are planning to offer next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing. Furthermore, we present data from 60 laboratories performing next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing regarding specimen requirements and assay characteristics. The findings indicate that most laboratories are performing tumor-only targeted sequencing to detect single-nucleotide variants and small insertions and deletions, using desktop sequencers and predesigned commercial kits. Despite these trends, a diversity of approaches to testing exists.

CONCLUSIONS

  • This information should be useful to further inform a variety of topics, including national discussions involving clinical laboratory quality systems, regulation and oversight of next-generation sequencing-based oncology testing, and precision oncology efforts in a data-driven manner.
摘要

背景

癌症获得性变异的检测是精准医学的一个范例,但关于广泛实验室中的临床实验室实践的报道却很少。

目的

利用美国病理学家协会能力验证调查结果,报告基于下一代测序的肿瘤检测实践的调查结果。

设计

使用美国病理学家协会能力验证调查结果,这些结果来自目前进行分子肿瘤检测的250多个实验室,以确定基于下一代测序的肿瘤检测中的实验室趋势。

结果

这些呈现的数据提供了关于目前提供或计划提供基于下一代测序的肿瘤检测的实验室数量的关键信息。此外,我们展示了来自60个进行基于下一代测序的肿瘤检测的实验室关于样本要求和检测特征的数据。研究结果表明,大多数实验室正在进行仅肿瘤靶向测序,以检测单核苷酸变异以及小的插入和缺失,使用台式测序仪和预先设计的商业试剂盒。尽管有这些趋势,但检测方法存在多样性。

结论

这些信息应有助于进一步为各种主题提供参考,包括涉及临床实验室质量体系的全国性讨论、基于下一代测序的肿瘤检测的监管以及以数据驱动的方式推进精准肿瘤学工作。

相似文献

1
A Window Into Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Oncology Testing Practices.基于下一代测序的临床肿瘤学检测实践之窗。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Dec;141(12):1679-1685. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0542-CP. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
2
An Overview of Characteristics of Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Testing for Hematologic Malignancies.血液系统恶性肿瘤临床下一代测序检测特点概述。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Sep 1;145(9):1110-1116. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0661-CP.
3
A Model Study of In Silico Proficiency Testing for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing.临床下一代测序的计算机模拟能力验证模型研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Oct;140(10):1085-91. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0194-CP. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
4
Performance Comparison of Different Analytic Methods in Proficiency Testing for Mutations in the , , and Genes: A Study of the College of American Pathologists Molecular Oncology Committee.不同分析方法在 College of American Pathologists 分子肿瘤学委员会基因突变能力验证中的性能比较:一项针对 、 、 基因的研究。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 Oct;143(10):1203-1211. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0396-CP. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
5
Proficiency Testing of Standardized Samples Shows Very High Interlaboratory Agreement for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Oncology Assays.标准化样本的能力验证显示临床下一代测序肿瘤分析的实验室间一致性非常高。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 Apr;143(4):463-471. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0336-CP. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
6
Next-Generation Sequencing Somatic and Germline Assay Troubleshooting Guide Derived From Proficiency Testing Data.基于能力验证数据的新一代测序体细胞和种系分析故障排除指南
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2022 Apr 1;146(4):451-461. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0842-CP.
7
Clinical Testing for Tumor Cell-Free DNA: College of American Pathologists Proficiency Programs Reveal Practice Trends.肿瘤游离 DNA 临床检测:美国病理学家学院能力验证计划揭示实践趋势。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2023 Apr 1;147(4):425-433. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0585-CP.
8
Multi-Institutional FASTQ File Exchange as a Means of Proficiency Testing for Next-Generation Sequencing Bioinformatics and Variant Interpretation.多机构FASTQ文件交换作为下一代测序生物信息学和变异解读能力验证的一种手段
J Mol Diagn. 2016 Jul;18(4):572-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 May 4.
9
Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Methods Show Superior or Equivalent Performance to Non-NGS Methods on , , and Proficiency Testing Samples.下一代测序(NGS)方法在 、 、 能力验证样本上的性能优于或等同于非 NGS 方法。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 Aug;143(8):980-984. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0394-CP. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
10
Trends in Cervical Cytology Screening and Reporting Practices: Results From the College of American Pathologists 2011 PAP Education Supplemental Questionnaire.宫颈细胞学筛查与报告实践的趋势:来自美国病理学家学会2011年巴氏涂片教育补充问卷的结果
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Jan;140(1):13-21. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0004-CP. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic variations and recurrence in stage III Korean colorectal cancer: Insights from tumor-only mutation analysis.Ⅲ期韩国结直肠癌的基因变异与复发:仅肿瘤突变分析的见解
PLoS One. 2025 May 23;20(5):e0323302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323302. eCollection 2025.
2
Consensus Recommendations to Optimize Testing for New Targetable Alterations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.非小细胞肺癌中新靶向改变的检测优化的共识推荐建议。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Jul 15;29(7):4981-4997. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29070396.
3
A Validation Framework for Somatic Copy Number Detection in Targeted Sequencing Panels.
用于靶向测序panel 中体细胞拷贝数检测的验证框架。
J Mol Diagn. 2022 Jul;24(7):760-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2022.03.011. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
4
NGS for (Hemato-) Oncology in Belgium: Evaluation of Laboratory Performance and Feasibility of a National External Quality Assessment Program.比利时血液肿瘤学的二代测序:实验室性能评估及国家外部质量评估计划的可行性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Oct 29;12(11):3180. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113180.
5
Medical oncologists' perspectives of the Veterans Affairs National Precision Oncology Program.退伍军人事务部国家精准肿瘤学计划:医学肿瘤学家的观点。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 24;15(7):e0235861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235861. eCollection 2020.
6
Beyond the Variants: Mutational Patterns in Next-Generation Sequencing Data for Cancer Precision Medicine.超越变异:癌症精准医学下一代测序数据中的突变模式
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020 May 19;8:370. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00370. eCollection 2020.
7
Inter-laboratory proficiency testing scheme for tumour next-generation sequencing in Ontario: a pilot study.安大略省肿瘤下一代测序的实验室间能力验证计划:一项试点研究。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(6):e717-e732. doi: 10.3747/co.26.5379. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
8
Proficiency Testing of Standardized Samples Shows Very High Interlaboratory Agreement for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Oncology Assays.标准化样本的能力验证显示临床下一代测序肿瘤分析的实验室间一致性非常高。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019 Apr;143(4):463-471. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0336-CP. Epub 2018 Oct 30.