Department of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil Interactions, Ministry of Education, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Ann Bot. 2017 Nov 28;120(6):937-942. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx106.
The nitrogen (N) to phosphorus (P) ratio (N:P) has been widely used as a threshold for identifying nutrient limitations in terrestrial plants; however, the associated reliability has not been well assessed.
The uncertainty of nutrient limitations caused by the N:P threshold was evaluated using two approaches: fertilization experiments synthesized across multiple ecosystems; and random sampling simulation of the impacts of different nutrient sufficiencies and deficiencies.
The fertilization experiment data indicated that the types of nutrient limitation determined via N:P thresholds were partly inconsistent with the growth responses observed under N and P additions, i.e. under N:P thresholds of 14 and 16 (or 10 and 20), 32.5 % (or 16.2 %) of the data were inconsistent between these two. The random sampling simulation suggested that N:P thresholds may indicate N (or P) limitations when leaf N (or P) content is sufficient, whereas these thresholds may not indicate N (or P) limitations when leaf N (or P) content is deficient. The error risks calculated from the sampling simulation presented large fluctuations at small sample sizes and decreased as the thresholds of nutrient content sufficiency (or deficiency) increased (or decreased). The N:P thresholds of 10 and 20 showed lower error risks than the thresholds of 14 and 16.
These findings highlight that canonical N:P thresholds have the potential to introduce a large uncertainty when used to detect plant nutrient limitations, suggesting that the error risks should be cautioned in future studies.
氮(N)磷(P)比(N:P)已被广泛用于确定陆地植物营养限制的阈值;然而,其相关可靠性尚未得到很好的评估。
通过两种方法评估由 N:P 阈值引起的营养限制的不确定性:综合多个生态系统的施肥实验;以及不同养分丰度和缺乏的影响的随机抽样模拟。
施肥实验数据表明,通过 N:P 阈值确定的营养限制类型与 N 和 P 添加下观察到的生长反应部分不一致,即在 N:P 阈值为 14 和 16(或 10 和 20)时,有 32.5%(或 16.2%)的数据在这两种情况下不一致。随机抽样模拟表明,当叶片 N(或 P)含量充足时,N:P 阈值可能指示 N(或 P)限制,但当叶片 N(或 P)含量不足时,这些阈值可能无法指示 N(或 P)限制。抽样模拟计算的误差风险在样本量较小时波动较大,随着养分含量充足(或不足)的阈值增加(或降低)而降低。10 和 20 的 N:P 阈值比 14 和 16 的阈值显示出更低的误差风险。
这些发现强调了在检测植物营养限制时,典型的 N:P 阈值可能会引入很大的不确定性,因此在未来的研究中应谨慎对待误差风险。