Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Jun;24(6):659.e5-659.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
Until recently whole genome sequencing (WGS) for mycobacteria has been restricted mostly to the research setting. However, in 2017 Public Health England has implemented WGS for routine mycobacterial identification and susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of this change on the laboratory turnaround times and availability of results.
Over the years 2016 and 2017, the period 1 January to 30 April was selected to represent before and after implementation of WGS. Prior to 2017, line probe assays were used for mycobacterial species identification. Turnaround times for the different steps of the diagnostic process were evaluated for all positive mycobacterial cultures that were sent from our hospital to the Reference Laboratory during the study period.
A total of 161 positive mycobacterial cultures were sent to the Reference Laboratory. Half of the isolates (n=81/161, 50%) were M. tuberculosis and 80/161 (50%) were non-tuberculous mycobacteria. The median number of workdays for mycobacterial species identification was 1 day (interquartile range (IQR) 1-3) in 2016 and 6 days (IQR 5-7) in 2017, p <0.001. For M. tuberculosis complex, the median time to drug susceptibility testing results, either molecular or phenotypic, was 12 days (IQR 11-18) in 2016 and 8 days (IQR 7-10) in 2017, p <0.001.
Routine WGS performed well in this setting for mycobacterial identification and susceptibility testing for M. tuberculosis and decreased time to drug susceptibility testing results. There was an increase in turnaround times for species identification using WGS, when compared with the previous methods.
直到最近,全基因组测序(WGS)主要限于研究环境中的分枝杆菌。然而,2017 年,英国公共卫生署已实施 WGS 对结核分枝杆菌进行常规分枝杆菌鉴定和药敏测试。我们的目的是评估这一变化对实验室周转时间和结果可用性的影响。
在 2016 年和 2017 年期间,选择 1 月 1 日至 4 月 30 日代表 WGS 实施前后。在 2017 年之前,线探针分析用于分枝杆菌种鉴定。在研究期间,从我们医院送到参考实验室的所有阳性分枝杆菌培养物中,评估了诊断过程的不同步骤的周转时间。
共发送 161 份阳性分枝杆菌培养物至参考实验室。一半的分离物(n=81/161,50%)为结核分枝杆菌,80/161(50%)为非结核分枝杆菌。2016 年分枝杆菌种鉴定的工作日中位数为 1 天(四分位距(IQR)1-3),2017 年为 6 天(IQR 5-7),p<0.001。对于结核分枝杆菌复合体,分子或表型药敏试验结果的中位时间为 12 天(IQR 11-18)在 2016 年和 8 天(IQR 7-10)在 2017 年,p<0.001。
在这种情况下,常规 WGS 可用于分枝杆菌鉴定和结核分枝杆菌药敏测试,并且缩短了药敏试验结果的时间。与以前的方法相比,使用 WGS 进行种鉴定时,周转时间增加。