Suppr超能文献

非转换注意瞬脱任务的知觉眨眼模型。

The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Surrey, AD Building, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, 135 Hicks Way, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1717-1739. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1385-6.

Abstract

The attentional blink (AB) is a temporary deficit for a second target (T2) when that target appears after a first target (T1). Although sophisticated models have been developed to explain the substantial AB literature in isolation, the current study considers how the AB relates to perceptual dynamics more broadly. We show that the time-course of the AB is closely related to the time course of the transition from positive to negative repetition priming effects in perceptual identification. Many AB tasks involve a switch between a T1 defined in one manner and a T2 defined in a different manner. Other AB tasks are non-switching, with all targets belonging to the same well-known category (e.g., letter targets versus number distractors) or sharing the same perceptual feature. We propose that these non-switching AB tasks reflect perceptual habituation for the target-defining attribute; thus, a 'perceptual wink', with perception of one attribute (target identity) undisturbed while perception of another (target detection) is impaired. On this account, the immediate benefit following T1 (lag-1 sparing) reflects positive repetition priming and the subsequent deficit (the blink) reflects negative repetition priming for the realization that a target occurred. In developing the perceptual wink model, we extended the nROUSE model of perceptual priming to explain the results of two new experiments combining the AB and identity repetitions. This establishes important connections between non-switching AB tasks and perceptual dynamics.

摘要

注意瞬脱(AB)是指在第一个目标(T1)之后出现第二个目标(T2)时,对第二个目标的短暂识别缺失。虽然已经开发出了复杂的模型来单独解释大量的 AB 文献,但本研究更广泛地考虑了 AB 与感知动态的关系。我们表明,AB 的时间进程与从正重复启动效应到负重复启动效应的感知识别的时间进程密切相关。许多 AB 任务涉及 T1 以一种方式定义,而 T2 以另一种方式定义之间的转换。其他 AB 任务是非转换的,所有目标都属于同一知名类别(例如,字母目标与数字干扰项)或共享相同的感知特征。我们提出,这些非转换 AB 任务反映了目标定义属性的感知习惯化;因此,出现了一个“感知眨眼”,一个属性(目标身份)的感知不受干扰,而另一个属性(目标检测)的感知受损。根据这个说法,紧随 T1 之后的即时获益(滞后 1 保护)反映了正重复启动,随后的缺陷(眨眼)反映了对目标出现的认识的负重复启动。在开发感知眨眼模型时,我们扩展了 nROUSE 感知启动模型,以解释结合 AB 和身份重复的两个新实验的结果。这为非转换 AB 任务和感知动态之间建立了重要联系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验