Perez-Alday Erick A, Thomas Jason A, Kabir Muammar, Sedaghat Golriz, Rogovoy Nichole, van Dam Eelco, van Dam Peter, Woodward William, Fuss Cristina, Ferencik Maros, Tereshchenko Larisa G
Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, USA.
Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, USA; Portland State University, Portland, USA.
J Electrocardiol. 2018 Jan-Feb;51(1):60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.08.035. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
We conducted a prospective clinical study (n=14; 29% female) to assess the accuracy of a three-dimensional (3D) photography-based method of torso geometry reconstruction and body surface electrodes localization. The position of 74 body surface electrocardiographic (ECG) electrodes (diameter 5mm) was defined by two methods: 3D photography, and CT (marker diameter 2mm) or MRI (marker size 10×20mm) imaging. Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement in X (bias -2.5 [95% limits of agreement (LoA) -19.5 to 14.3] mm), Y (bias -0.1 [95% LoA -14.1 to 13.9] mm), and Z coordinates (bias -0.8 [95% LoA -15.6 to 14.2] mm), as defined by the CT/MRI imaging, and 3D photography. The average Hausdorff distance between the two torso geometry reconstructions was 11.17±3.05mm. Thus, accurate torso geometry reconstruction using 3D photography is feasible. Body surface ECG electrodes coordinates as defined by the CT/MRI imaging, and 3D photography, are in good agreement.
我们进行了一项前瞻性临床研究(n = 14;29%为女性),以评估基于三维(3D)摄影的躯干几何形状重建和体表电极定位方法的准确性。74个体表心电图(ECG)电极(直径5mm)的位置通过两种方法确定:3D摄影以及CT(标记直径2mm)或MRI(标记尺寸10×20mm)成像。Bland-Altman分析表明,在由CT/MRI成像和3D摄影定义的X坐标(偏差-2.5 [95%一致性界限(LoA)-19.5至14.3] mm)、Y坐标(偏差-0.1 [95% LoA -14.1至13.9] mm)和Z坐标(偏差-0.8 [95% LoA -15.6至14.2] mm)方面具有良好的一致性。两种躯干几何形状重建之间的平均豪斯多夫距离为11.17±3.05mm。因此,使用3D摄影进行准确的躯干几何形状重建是可行的。由CT/MRI成像和3D摄影定义的体表ECG电极坐标具有良好的一致性。