Suppr超能文献

硅橡胶/生物活性玻璃和硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的理化性质和体积变化。

Physicochemical Properties and Volumetric Change of Silicone/Bioactive Glass and Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Sealers.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Araraquara Dental School, São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Araraquara Dental School, São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Endod. 2017 Dec;43(12):2097-2101. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated setting time (ST), radiopacity, pH, flow, solubility, and volumetric change (VC) of a silicone, gutta-percha, and bioactive glass-based sealer, GuttaFlow Bioseal (GFB), and a calcium silicate-based sealer, TotalFill BC Sealer (TFBC), in comparison with AH Plus.

METHODS

ST and flow were evaluated in accordance with the ISO 6876 Standard. pH was evaluated after different time intervals (1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days). Radiopacity was evaluated by radiographic analysis in millimeters of aluminum. Solubility was evaluated by means of mass loss (%) after 7 and 30 days of immersion in distilled water. VC was evaluated by micro-computed tomography, by using cavities 3 mm deep and 1 mm in diameter in acrylic resin, filled with the materials. The materials were evaluated after setting and after 7 and 30 days of immersion in distilled water. The data were submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey statistical tests (P < .05).

RESULTS

TFBC demonstrated the highest pH and solubility. GFB had the shortest ST, and lowest radiopacity and flow values. VC was similar for the sealers in both time intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

TFBC presented the highest pH and solubility, but showed similar VC to GFB and AH Plus. GFB showed proper physicochemical properties. Micro-computed tomography complements the physicochemical analysis of endodontic sealers.

摘要

简介

本研究评估了一种基于硅胶、牙胶和生物活性玻璃的根管封闭剂 GuttaFlow Bioseal(GFB)和一种基于硅酸钙的根管封闭剂 TotalFill BC Sealer(TFBC)的凝固时间(ST)、射线不透性、pH 值、流动性、溶解度和体积变化(VC),并与 AH Plus 进行了比较。

方法

根据 ISO 6876 标准评估 ST 和流动性。在不同的时间间隔(1、3、7、14、21 和 28 天)评估 pH 值。通过在毫米铝厚度的射线照相分析评估射线不透性。通过在蒸馏水浸泡 7 和 30 天后的质量损失(%)评估溶解度。通过在丙烯酸树脂中用 3 毫米深和 1 毫米直径的空腔评估 VC,并用材料填充。在凝固后和在蒸馏水浸泡 7 和 30 天后评估材料。将数据提交方差分析和 Tukey 统计检验(P<.05)。

结果

TFBC 表现出最高的 pH 值和溶解度。GFB 的 ST 最短,射线不透性和流动性值最低。在两个时间间隔内,密封剂的 VC 相似。

结论

TFBC 表现出最高的 pH 值和溶解度,但与 GFB 和 AH Plus 的 VC 相似。GFB 表现出适当的物理化学性质。微计算机断层扫描补充了根管封闭剂的物理化学分析。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验