Suppr超能文献

水中的药物、特拉华河和湾中的鱼类和鱼鹰雏鸟。

Pharmaceuticals in water, fish and osprey nestlings in Delaware River and Bay.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD, USA.

出版信息

Environ Pollut. 2018 Jan;232:533-545. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.083. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

Abstract

Exposure of wildlife to Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) is likely to occur but studies of risk are limited. One exposure pathway that has received attention is trophic transfer of APIs in a water-fish-osprey food chain. Samples of water, fish plasma and osprey plasma were collected from Delaware River and Bay, and analyzed for 21 APIs. Only 2 of 21 analytes exceeded method detection limits in osprey plasma (acetaminophen and diclofenac) with plasma levels typically 2-3 orders of magnitude below human therapeutic concentrations (HTC). We built upon a screening level model used to predict osprey exposure to APIs in Chesapeake Bay and evaluated whether exposure levels could have been predicted in Delaware Bay had we just measured concentrations in water or fish. Use of surface water and BCFs did not predict API concentrations in fish well, likely due to fish movement patterns, and partitioning and bioaccumulation uncertainties associated with these ionizable chemicals. Input of highest measured API concentration in fish plasma combined with pharmacokinetic data accurately predicted that diclofenac and acetaminophen would be the APIs most likely detected in osprey plasma. For the majority of APIs modeled, levels were not predicted to exceed 1 ng/mL or method detection limits in osprey plasma. Based on the target analytes examined, there is little evidence that APIs represent a significant risk to ospreys nesting in Delaware Bay. If an API is present in fish orders of magnitude below HTC, sampling of fish-eating birds is unlikely to be necessary. However, several human pharmaceuticals accumulated in fish plasma within a recommended safety factor for HTC. It is now important to expand the scope of diet-based API exposure modeling to include alternative exposure pathways (e.g., uptake from landfills, dumps and wastewater treatment plants) and geographic locations (developing countries) where API contamination of the environment may represent greater risk.

摘要

野生动物接触活性药物成分 (API) 的可能性很大,但风险研究有限。一种受到关注的暴露途径是水-鱼-鱼鹰食物链中的 API 营养转移。从特拉华河和湾采集了水样、鱼血浆和鱼鹰血浆样本,并对 21 种 API 进行了分析。仅在鱼鹰血浆中发现 21 种分析物中的 2 种超过了方法检测限(对乙酰氨基酚和双氯芬酸),血浆水平通常比人类治疗浓度 (HTC) 低 2-3 个数量级。我们在用于预测切萨皮克湾鱼鹰暴露于 API 的筛选水平模型的基础上进行了扩展,并评估了如果我们仅测量水或鱼中的浓度,是否可以预测特拉华湾的暴露水平。使用地表水和 BCF 并不能很好地预测鱼类中 API 的浓度,这可能是由于鱼类的运动模式以及与这些可电离化学物质相关的分配和生物积累不确定性。将最高测量的鱼血浆中 API 浓度与药代动力学数据结合使用,可以准确预测双氯芬酸和对乙酰氨基酚将是最有可能在鱼鹰血浆中检测到的 API。对于大多数建模的 API,预计其水平不会超过 1 ng/mL 或鱼鹰血浆中的方法检测限。根据所检查的目标分析物,几乎没有证据表明 API 对在特拉华湾筑巢的鱼鹰构成重大风险。如果 API 存在于鱼类中,其浓度远低于 HTC,则对吃鱼的鸟类进行采样可能没有必要。然而,几种人类药物在 HTC 的推荐安全系数内积累在鱼血浆中。现在重要的是扩大基于饮食的 API 暴露模型的范围,包括替代暴露途径(例如,从垃圾填埋场、垃圾场和废水处理厂吸收)和 API 污染环境可能代表更大风险的地理区域(发展中国家)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验