• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个性对整体幸福感和体验幸福感的行为者、伴侣及相似性效应。

Actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on global and experienced well-being.

作者信息

Chopik William J, Lucas Richard E

机构信息

Michigan State University.

出版信息

J Res Pers. 2019 Feb;78:249-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2018.12.008
PMID:31123370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6527370/
Abstract

The current study examined actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on a variety of well-being indices, including both global and experiential measures of well-being in 2,578 heterosexual couples ( = 5,156 individuals; = 51.04, = 13.68) who completed the 2016 Wellbeing and Daily Life supplement to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). Among actor effects, those for conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion, and neuroticism were the most robust predictors of well-being. Among partner effects, conscientiousness and neuroticism were the most robust predictors of well-being. Consistent with past research, similarity effects on well-being were generally small and not always significant. The results are discussed in the context of experiential conceptualizations of well-being and operationalizing similarity in relationship research.

摘要

本研究考察了人格的个体效应、伴侣效应以及相似性效应,这些效应涉及多种幸福指数,包括对2578对异性恋伴侣(共5156人;平均年龄51.04岁,标准差13.68岁)的整体幸福感和体验式幸福感的测量,这些伴侣完成了2016年收入动态面板研究(PSID)的幸福感与日常生活补充调查。在个体效应中,尽责性、宜人性、外向性和神经质的效应是幸福感最有力的预测因素。在伴侣效应中,尽责性和神经质是幸福感最有力的预测因素。与以往研究一致,幸福感的相似性效应通常较小,且并非总是显著。我们将在幸福感的体验式概念化以及关系研究中相似性的操作化背景下讨论这些结果。

相似文献

1
Actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on global and experienced well-being.个性对整体幸福感和体验幸福感的行为者、伴侣及相似性效应。
J Res Pers. 2019 Feb;78:249-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
2
Longitudinal actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on well-being.人格对幸福感的纵向主体间、伴侣间和相似性效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Oct;117(4):e51-e70. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000211. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
3
Within-Couple Personality Concordance Over Time: The Importance of Personality Synchrony for Perceived Spousal Support.夫妻间的人格一致性随时间的推移:人格同步对感知到的配偶支持的重要性。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 1;76(1):31-43. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa163.
4
The Actor, Partner, Similarity Effects of Personality, and Interactions with Gender and Relationship Duration among Chinese Emerging Adults.中国新兴成年人中的行为者、伴侣、人格相似性效应以及与性别和恋爱时长的相互作用
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 29;8:1698. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01698. eCollection 2017.
5
The dyadic effects of personality traits on depression in advanced lung cancer patients and caregivers: The mediating role of acceptance of illness.人格特质对晚期肺癌患者及其照顾者抑郁的双重影响:疾病接受程度的中介作用。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jan;31(1):e13538. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13538. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
6
Big Five predictors of behavior and perceptions in initial dyadic interactions: personality similarity helps extraverts and introverts, but hurts "disagreeables".初次二元互动中行为和认知的大五人格预测因素:人格相似性对外向者和内向者有帮助,但对“难相处者”有损害。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Oct;97(4):667-84. doi: 10.1037/a0015741.
7
Trait and facet personality similarity and relationship and life satisfaction in romantic couples.浪漫情侣的特质与层面人格相似性、关系及生活满意度
J Res Pers. 2023 Jun;104. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104378. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
Domain and facet personality predictors of all-cause mortality among Medicare patients aged 65 to 100.65至100岁医疗保险患者全因死亡率的领域和层面人格预测因素
Psychosom Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;67(5):724-33. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000181272.58103.18.
9
Effects of big-five personality traits on the quality of relationship and satisfaction in Chinese coach-athlete dyads.大五人格特质对中国教练-运动员二元组中关系质量和满意度的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Aug;25(4):568-80. doi: 10.1111/sms.12329. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
10
Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: the relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects.在来自三个国家的全国代表性样本中,从人格预测关系和生活满意度:演员、伴侣和相似性效应的相对重要性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct;99(4):690-702. doi: 10.1037/a0020385.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits.基于 22 项特征的系统评价和荟萃分析以及对英国生物库 133 项特征的分析,为人类特征相关性提供证据。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Sep;7(9):1568-1583. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01672-z. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
2
Trait and facet personality similarity and relationship and life satisfaction in romantic couples.浪漫情侣的特质与层面人格相似性、关系及生活满意度
J Res Pers. 2023 Jun;104. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104378. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
3
The associations between personality traits and quality of life, satisfaction with life, and well-being over time in people with dementia and their caregivers: findings from the IDEAL programme.痴呆患者及其照料者的人格特质与生活质量、生活满意度和幸福感随时间的关系:来自 IDEAL 项目的研究结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jun 6;23(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04075-x.
4
Partner influences on ICT use variety among middle-aged and older adults: The role of need for cognition.伴侣对中老年成年人信息通信技术使用多样性的影响:认知需求的作用。
Comput Human Behav. 2022 Jan;126. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107028. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
5
Within-Couple Personality Concordance Over Time: The Importance of Personality Synchrony for Perceived Spousal Support.夫妻间的人格一致性随时间的推移:人格同步对感知到的配偶支持的重要性。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 1;76(1):31-43. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa163.
6
Optimism, pessimism, and health biomarkers in older couples.老年夫妇中的乐观、悲观情绪与健康生物标志物。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov;25(4):1055-1073. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12466. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring Experiential Well-Being among Older Adults.衡量老年人的体验幸福感。
J Posit Psychol. 2019;14(4):538-547. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2018.1497686. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
2
Gratitude across the life span: Age differences and links to subjective well-being.一生的感恩之情:年龄差异及其与主观幸福感的联系。
J Posit Psychol. 2019;14(3):292-302. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2017.1414296. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
3
Redefine statistical significance.重新定义统计学显著性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jan;2(1):6-10. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z.
4
Advances and Open Questions in the Science of Subjective Well-Being.主观幸福感科学的进展与悬而未决的问题
Collabra Psychol. 2018;4(1). doi: 10.1525/collabra.115. Epub 2018 May 24.
5
The Validity of the Day Reconstruction Method in the German Socio-Economic Panel Study.日重建法在德国社会经济面板研究中的有效性
Soc Indic Res. 2017 Jan;130(1):213-232. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1172-6. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
6
Longitudinal actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on well-being.人格对幸福感的纵向主体间、伴侣间和相似性效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Oct;117(4):e51-e70. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000211. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
7
Comparing the Reliability and Validity of Global Self-Report Measures of Subjective Well-Being With Experiential Day Reconstruction Measures.比较全球主观幸福感自评量表与经验性日间重建测量的可靠性和有效性。
Assessment. 2020 Jan;27(1):102-116. doi: 10.1177/1073191117744660. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
8
Day-to-day affect is surprisingly stable: A two-year longitudinal study of well-being.日常情绪出奇地稳定:一项关于幸福感的两年纵向研究。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 Jan;8(1):45-54. doi: 10.1177/1948550616662129. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
9
The Actor, Partner, Similarity Effects of Personality, and Interactions with Gender and Relationship Duration among Chinese Emerging Adults.中国新兴成年人中的行为者、伴侣、人格相似性效应以及与性别和恋爱时长的相互作用
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 29;8:1698. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01698. eCollection 2017.
10
Ideal Standards, Acceptance, and Relationship Satisfaction: Latitudes of Differential Effects.理想标准、接纳与关系满意度:差异效应的范围
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 28;8:1691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01691. eCollection 2017.